CUYAHOGA FALLS, OH —
OSHA Inspection: TECHNICOTE, INC.
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of TECHNICOTE, INC. in 70 MARC DRIVE, CUYAHOGA FALLS, OH 44223 (NAICS 325520). OSHA activity number 331103689.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- TECHNICOTE, INC.
- Site address
- 70 MARC DRIVE
- City
- CUYAHOGA FALLS
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 44223
- Mailing
- 1080 HOME AVE., AKRON, OH 44310
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 325520
- Employees
- 55
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- May 3, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 28, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section: On or about December 16, 2011, the employer did not develop and document machine-specific lockout/tagout procedures for equipment including, but not limited to the coaters and slitters, which had both electrical and pneumatic energy present.
Recent events (3)
- — C (S) $2800
- — F (S) $1960
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.157 G02
- Issued
- May 3, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 28, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $2,940 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(2): The educational program to familiarize employees with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting was not provided to all employees upon initial employment, and at least annually thereafter: On or about December 16, 2011, there was a fire at the facility. Fire extinguishers were used by employees and the employer did not provide fire extinguisher training initially upon employment and then annually thereafter. Note: Applies where all employees are expected to fight fires.
Recent events (3)
- — C (S) $4200
- — F (S) $2940
- — Z (S) $4200
1910.178 L04 III
- Issued
- May 3, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 28, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance shall be conducted at least once every three years: On or about December 16, 2011, the employer did not reevaluate powered industrial truck operators as required.
Recent events (3)
- — C (S) $2800
- — F (S) $1960
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- May 3, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 28, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: On or about December 16, 2011, the employer did not provide information and training to employees exposed to hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to lubricants, silicones, solvents, and adhesives.
Recent events (3)
- — C (S) $4200
- — F (O) $0
- — Z (S) $4200
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- May 3, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 28, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed through written certification that identified the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation had been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, identified the document as a certification of the hazard assessment: On or about December 16, 2011, the employer did not have a written certification of hazard assessment. Employees were exposed to hazards during coating, cutting, cleaning, and maintenance activities.
Recent events (3)
- — C (O) $0
- — F (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Technicote, INC.
View Technicote, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 325520)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 331103689.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.