Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: GREAT LAKES PACKAGING CORPORATION

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of GREAT LAKES PACKAGING CORPORATION in W190 N11393 CARNEGIE DR., GERMANTOWN, WI 53022 (NAICS 322211). OSHA activity number 331107342.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Great Lakes Packaging Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Great Lakes Packaging Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
W190 N11393 CARNEGIE DR.
City
GERMANTOWN
State
WI
ZIP
53022
Mailing
ATTN: JOHN FRIDDELL W190 N11393 CARNEGIE DR., GERMANTOWN, WI 53022
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
322211
Employees
99
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 80 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2012
Abate by
Jun 25, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $3,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i):     Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:    (a) Procedures were not developed, documented, and utilized fro the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees are engaged in activities requiring lockout/tagout throughout the facility. In addition, machine specific procedures are required for equipment with multiple sources of energy such as but not limited to: Machine #125, which utilizes both electrical and hydraulic energy sources.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3500
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.147 F03 II D

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(f)(3)(ii)(D):     Each authorized employee shall affix a personal lockout or tagout device to the group lockout device prior to working on the machine or equipment:    (a) Two employees that were servicing Machine #125  F & E Printer, were using the same lock for performing lockout/tagout. Only one employee had control of the key for the lock. The employee with the key could start up the machine without the other employee knowing exposing that individual to caught-in-between, crushing, or amputation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.178 L04 II B

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2012
Abate by
Jun 25, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,575 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(ii)(B):     Refresher training in relevant topics was not provided to the operator when the operator had been involved in an accident or near-miss incident.    (a) The employer did not ensure that an employee involved in a forklift accident had received refresher training before operating a forklift after the accident.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $1575

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 10 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2012
Abate by
Jun 25, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,450 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1):     One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, and rotating parts:    (a) Machine #151  Ward Flexo Folder Gluer, Model 12000, Serial #S-120642RSYGE-CNC2, had a guard that was not adjusted properly exposing employees to caught-in-between hazards.    (b) Machine #125  F & E Printer, Model PB, Serial #1062, had multiple rollers that were not guarded exposing employees to caught-in-between and possible amputation hazards.    (c) Machine #169  Interlake Stitcher, Model 05POS, Serial #1055 had moving parts that were not guarded exposing employees to caught-in-between hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2450
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.1200 F05 II

Deleted Other-than-serious 2 instances 10 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(ii):     The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the appropriate hazard warnings:    (a) The employer did not ensure that every spray bottle containing chemicals, i.e. Transfer Aid and Hydro Anti-Foam, had proper labeling to identify the hazards of the substances in the spray bottles.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Great Lakes Packaging Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 331107342.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.