OAK CREEK, WI —
OSHA Inspection: STEELWIND INDUSTRIES, INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of STEELWIND INDUSTRIES, INC. in 7550 S. 10TH ST., OAK CREEK, WI 53154 (NAICS 332999). OSHA activity number 333321073.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- STEELWIND INDUSTRIES, INC.
- Site address
- 7550 S. 10TH ST.
- City
- OAK CREEK
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53154
- Mailing
- 7550 S. 10TH ST., OAK CREEK, WI 53154
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332999
- Employees
- 95
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 F01
- Issued
- Jun 13, 2012
- Abate by
- Jul 26, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,785 · Current $893 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): (a) On or around April 19, 2012, in the Fabrication Department, a worker who performed duties of attendant and fire watch, outside the entrance of the Walking Shoe confined space, was required to use a tight-fitting half-face respirator with P100 filters, but had not been previously fit tested for that respirator. Because welding was being performed inside the Walking Shoe space, the attendant was potentially exposed to welding fumes which could adversely affect the respiratory system.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $893
- — Z (S) $1785
1910.134 G01 I A
- Issued
- Jun 13, 2012
- Abate by
- Jul 5, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function: (a) On or around April 19, 2012, In the Fabrication Department, a worker acting as attendant at the entrance to the Walking Shoe confined space had excessive facial hair which could interfere with the seal between the tight-fitting half-face respirator and the skin of the face. Because two workers had entered into this space to perform welding, the attendant was potentially exposed to air contaminants such as welding fumes.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.146 C01
- Issued
- Jun 13, 2012
- Abate by
- Jul 26, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,975 · Current $1,488 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(1): The employer did not evaluate the workplace to determine if any spaces were permit-required confined spaces: (a) The evaluation that had been performed was inadequate and in some cases resulted in erroneous classification of spaces. For example, in the employer's Confined space Entry Program, an appendix to that program entitled "Confined Space Summary" listed that the "Walking Shoe" as a non-permit confined space, but also listed hazards of that space including "Potential Hazardous Atmosphere". The classification of the "Walking Shoe" as a non-permit confined space was erroneous because, by definition (as defined in 29 CFR 1910.146), a non-permit confined space means a confined space that does not contain or, with respect to atmospheric hazards, have the potential to contain any hazard capable of causing death or serious physical harm. On April 12, 2012, when welders were working inside the Walking Shoe, OSHA monitoring detected elevated carbon monoxide concentrations (at times in excess of 400 parts per million) inside that confined space. Exposure to elevated concentrations of carbon monoxide constituted an atmospheric hazard capable of causing serious physical harm. This atmospheric hazard was not eliminated by the use of supplied air respirators by these workers.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1488
- — Z (S) $2975
1910.252 C04 I
- Issued
- Jun 13, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,975 · Current $1,488 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.252(c)(4)(i): All welding and cutting operations carried on in confined spaces were not adequately ventilated to prevent the accumulation of toxic materials or possible oxygen deficiency: (a) On or around April 12, 2012, in the Fabrication Department, when workers were directed to enter and perform welding into the Walking Shoe confined space, no provision was made for ventilation to prevent accumulation of toxic substances, such as carbon monoxide, which was detected at levels in excess of 400 parts per million inside the space.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1488
- — Z (S) $2975
1910.134 D01 II
- Issued
- Jun 13, 2012
- Abate by
- Jul 26, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(ii): The employer did not select and use a NIOSH-certified respirator in compliance with the conditions of its certification: (a) Workers were observed using a combination of a negative pressure respirator inside of a supplied air respirator. The use of this combination of different types of respirators had not been approved by NIOSH and as such was an unapproved respirator assembly, which was not in compliance with the NIOSH certification for either respirator. In the Fabrication Department, for example, on or around April 12, 2012, a welder was observed wearing a N95 disposable dust mask respirator inside of a supplied air welding helmet.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.134 I05 IV
- Issued
- Jun 13, 2012
- Abate by
- Jul 5, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(i)(5)(iv): The employer did not ensure that the person authorized to perform the necessary sorbent bed and filter changes filled out a tag indicating by the signature and date that maintenance changes were performed: (a) Regarding the breathing air provided via oil lubricated screw compressors,for workers perfoming blasting and other operations (such welding inside the Walking Shoe), no tag was filled out to indicate that necessary maintenance had been done by the authorized worker at the proper frequency.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Steelwind Industries, INC.
View Steelwind Industries, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332999)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 333321073.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.