Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,991Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-24 Last loaded 2026-08-27

OSHA Inspection: ZARO BAKE SHOP, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ZARO BAKE SHOP, INC. in 138 BRUCKNER BLVD., BRONX, NY 10454 (NAICS 311812). OSHA activity number 333885044.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Zaro Bake Shop, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Zaro Bake Shop, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
138 BRUCKNER BLVD.
City
BRONX
State
NY
ZIP
10454
Mailing
138 BRUCKNER BLVD., BRONX, NY 10454
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311812
Employees
85
Ownership type
Private (A)

8 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Oct 11, 2012
Abate by
Nov 1, 2012
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances E200

OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees(s) were exposed to the hazard of an explosion or fire due to the ignition of a combustible dust by static discharge:    a) Mixing Area    Non-conducting plastic pipes used to connect the flour supply lines to the hopper creates a potential for static build up during the transfer of flour.  If a combustible concentration of dust is present during the transfer , static discharge could result in an explosion and /or fire, exposing employees to the hazards of serious thermal burns and /or being struck by debris ( in the event of an explosion); on or about 4/19/12.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $5000
  • · Z (S) $5000

1910.22 A01

Serious Gravity 5 10 exposed
Issued
Oct 11, 2012
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $4,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1): All places of employment, passageways, storerooms or service rooms were not kept clean and orderly or in a sanitary condition.    Location: Bread Dept.    a) Combustible flour dust accumulated on pipes, masonary walls, and other working surfaces; on or about 4/19/12.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $4000
  • · C (S) $5000
  • · Z (S) $5000

1910.22 A02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Oct 11, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(2): Floor(s) of workroom(s) were not maintained in a clean and, so far as possible, a dry condition:      Location: Production Area    a) The floor in the production area was wet due to water leaking from the sink; on or about 4/13/12
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $2000
  • · C (S) $3000
  • · Z (S) $3000

1910.132 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Oct 11, 2012
Abate by
Oct 25, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE):    Location: Workplace    a)  Employees work with hazardous chemicals such as but not limited potassium hydroxide during the cleaning process. The employer did not conduct a hazard assessment of the workplace; on or about 4/13/12
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $3000
  • · C (S) $4000
  • · Z (S) $4000

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 5 6 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Oct 11, 2012
Abate by
Oct 18, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:      Location:  Washroom  a)  Employees use corrosive chemicals such as but not limited to potassium hydroxide and the employer did not provide eye and protection; on or about 4/13/12.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Oct 11, 2012
Abate by
Oct 22, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c):     Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:      Location:  Washroom    a)  Employees work with cleaning chemicals which contain corrosive chemicals such as potassium hydroxide.  The employer did not have a quick drenching facility in the work area; on or about 4/13/12
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $3000
  • · C (S) $4000
  • · Z (S) $4000

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Oct 11, 2012
Abate by
Feb 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    Location; Workplace    a) Employees work with hazardous chemicals such as but not limited to potassium hydroxide, chlorine bleach.  The employer did not develop or implement a written hazard comunication program; on or about 4/13/12
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $3000
  • · C (S) $4000
  • · Z (S) $4000

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Oct 11, 2012
Abate by
Feb 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:    Location: Workplace    a) Employees work with hazardous chemicals such as but not limited to potassium hydroxide and chlorine bleach.  The employer did not provide hazard communication training; on or about 4/13/12.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

View Zaro Bake Shop, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 333885044.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.