Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,991Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-24 Last loaded 2026-08-27

OSHA Inspection: ZARO BAKE SHOP, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ZARO BAKE SHOP, INC. in 138 BRUCKNER BLVD., BRONX, NY 10454 (NAICS 311812). OSHA activity number 338959778.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Zaro Bake Shop, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Zaro Bake Shop, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
138 BRUCKNER BLVD.
City
BRONX
State
NY
ZIP
10454
Mailing
138 BRUCKNER BLVD., BRONX, NY 10454
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311812
Employees
70
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 50 exposed
Issued
Aug 2, 2013
Abate by
Aug 14, 2013
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $4,800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): Energy control program. The employer did not establish a program consisting of energy control procedures, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performs any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:      location: entire site  on or about 3/15/13    a)  The employer did not have an energy control program. Employees maintain and service some of the equipment themselves including but not limited to mixers and muffin dispensers.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $4800
  • · C (S) $7000
  • · Z (S) $7000

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 50 exposed
Issued
Aug 2, 2013
Abate by
Aug 14, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees are engaged in the activities covered by this section:   location: entire site on or about 3/15/13  a)  The employer did not adequately develop, document or utilize procedures for the control of hazardous energy. Employees service and maintain equipment including but not limited to mixers and muffin dispensers.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.147 C05 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 50 exposed
Issued
Aug 2, 2013
Abate by
Aug 14, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(5)(i): Locks, tags, chains, wedges, key blocks, adapter pins, self-locking fasteners, or other hardware were not provided by the employer for isolating, securing or blocking of machines or equipment from energy sources:    location: entire site on or about 3/15/13  a)  The employer did not provide devices for isolating machines or equipment from energy sources. Employees service and maintain equipment including but not limited to mixers and muffin dispensers.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Aug 2, 2013
Abate by
Sep 5, 2013
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding were not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are-barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices,electronic safety devices, etc.:   location: mixing area on or about 3/14/13  a)  The piston of the Hinds-Bock Corp. muffin dispenser, model 4P-08NT, was not provided with guarding to prevent employees from coming into contact with the pinch point of the piston.   location: mixing area on or about: 3/14/13  b) The foot pedal of the Hinds-Bock Corp. muffin dispenser, model 4P-08NT, was not guarded, exposing employees to unintended operation by accidentally stepping onto the foot control.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $7000
  • · Z (S) $7000

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Aug 2, 2013
Abate by
Sep 5, 2013
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $4,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):    location: mixing area  on or about 3/14/13    a)  The Hinds-Bock Corp. muffin dispenser, model 4P-08NT, was not provided with guarding to prevent employees from coming into contact with the point of operation.        location: mixing area  on or about 3/15/13    b) The AMF vertical mixers (Co. # 8&16) were not provided with guarding to prevent employees from coming into contact with the points of operation of the mixer.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $4700
  • · C (S) $7000
  • · Z (S) $7000

View Zaro Bake Shop, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 338959778.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.