Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: PERFECTION MASONRY, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of PERFECTION MASONRY, INC. in 200 S. CHAMPLIN, MCPHERSON, KS 67460 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 333941029.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Perfection Masonry, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Perfection Masonry, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
200 S. CHAMPLIN
City
MCPHERSON
State
KS
ZIP
67460
Mailing
16045 SW 145TH TERRACE, ROSE HILL, KS 67133
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 18, 2012
Abate by
Jul 26, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $240 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, material safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met, and which also includes the following:    At 200 S. Champlin, McPherson, KS, the employer did not develop a written hazard communication program to protect employees from the hazards associated with the handling of unleaded gasoline, adhesives and other chemicals associated with the masonry industry.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $240
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.1200 G01

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 18, 2012
Abate by
Jun 11, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): The employers did not have a material safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use such as gasoline, rock adhesive mastic and mortar.    At 200 S. Champlin, McPherson, KS, the employer did not ensure that Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDSs) were available for employees for chemicals, such as gasoline, mastic and mortar, exposing employees to potential chemical burns and inhalation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 18, 2012
Abate by
Jun 11, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $240 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1):  Employees were not protected by eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.    At 200 S. Champlin, McPherson, KS, an employee cutting rock with a cutoff saw was not wearing eye protection, exposing the employee to a potential eye hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $240
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.134 A01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 18, 2012
Abate by
Jun 11, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $240 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(a)(1): In the control of those occupational diseases caused by breathing air contaminated with harmful dusts, fogs, fumes, mists, gases, smokes, sprays, or vapors, the primary objective shall be to prevent atmospheric contamination. This shall be accomplished as far as feasible by accepted engineering control measures (for example, enclosure or confinement of the operation, general and local ventilation, and substitution of less toxic materials). When effective engineering controls are not feasible, or while they are being instituted, appropriate respirators shall be used pursuant to this section.    At 200 S. Champlin St, McPherson, KS, an employee cutting stone using a dry saw was not protected from the dust by a respirator, exposing the employee to respirator illness and injury.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $240
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 18, 2012
Abate by
Jun 11, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $320 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as follows:    At 200 S. Champlin St, McPherson, KS, two separate scaffolds were not fully planked or decked, exposing employees to fall approximately 8 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $320
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.451 C02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 18, 2012
Abate by
Jun 11, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $240 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, and uprights did not bear on base plates and mud sills or other adequate firm foundation.    At 200 S. Champlin St, McPherson, KS, the employer had permitted the use of a scaffold, which was missing baseplates on two of the supported scaffold, exposing employees to a fall hazard of approximately 8 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $240
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.452 C02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 18, 2012
Abate by
Jun 11, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $320 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.452(c)(2): Frames and panels were not braced by cross, horizontal, or diagonal braces, or combination thereof, which secure vertical members together laterally.     At 200 S. Champlin, McPherson, KS, two scaffolds were missing cross bracing on the second level, exposing employees of falls of up to approximately 8 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $320
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.20 B01

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 18, 2012
Abate by
Jun 11, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part.    At 200 S. Champlin, McPherson, KS, an accident prevention program had not been developed for employees performing masonry work, exposing employees to chemical, struck by and fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Perfection Masonry, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 333941029.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.