Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: EASTHAM DRILLING INC.

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of EASTHAM DRILLING INC. in 8 MI N OF FM 1347 OFF CR 119 WILSON COUNTY ADELE DUBOSE WELL #2, STOCKDALE, TX 78160 (NAICS 213111). OSHA activity number 334065034.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Eastham Drilling INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Eastham Drilling INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
8 MI N OF FM 1347 OFF CR 119 WILSON COUNTY ADELE DUBOSE WELL #2
City
STOCKDALE
State
TX
ZIP
78160
Mailing
4710 BELLAIRE BLVD. STE. 350, BELLAIRE, TX 77401
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
213111
Employees
11
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.106 E02 IV A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Sep 11, 2012
Abate by
Sep 12, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,700 · Current $1,620 Reduced

Hazardous substances 16602590

29 CFR 1910.106(e)(2)(iv)(a): Flammable liquids were not kept in covered containers when not actually in use:  At the Rig 1 drilling site located at Adele DuBose #2 Well in Gonzales County, Texas, on or about March 22, 2012 and at times prior thereto, open containers of flammable solvents in the Parts House were used for soaking paint brushes after use by employees on the rig.   Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the date of this citation, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that flammable liquids are kept in covered containers when not actually in use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1620
  • — Z (S) $2700

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 11, 2012
Abate by
Sep 12, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,700 · Current $1,620 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1):   The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:  At the Rig 1 drilling site located at Adele DuBose #2 Well in Gonzales County, Texas, on or about March 22, 2012 and at times prior thereto, employee(s) were wearing non-safety type prescription glasses in lieu of appropriate personal protective equipment for eyes and/or face, such as safety glasses with sideshields, while tripping pipe on a well, exposing employees eyes to the hazards of being struck by flying or falling particulates.   Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the date of this citation, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1620
  • — Z (S) $2700

1910.1200 F05 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Sep 11, 2012
Abate by
Sep 12, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,700 · Current $1,620 Reduced

Hazardous substances 108016602590

29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(i): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemical(s) contained therein:  At the Rig 1 drilling site located at Adele DuBose #2 Well in Gonzales County, Texas, on or about March 22, 2012 and at times prior thereto, in the Parts House, in-house plastic containers with brushes soaking in flammable solvent were not labeled with the contents.   Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the date of this citation, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace is labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemical(s) contained therein.  .
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1620
  • — Z (S) $2700

1910.1200 F05 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Sep 11, 2012
Abate by
Sep 12, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 108016602590

29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the appropriate hazard warnings:  (a) At the Rig 1 drilling site located at Adele DuBose #2 Well in Gonzales County, Texas, on or about March 22, 2012 and at times prior thereto, employees were dispensing hydraulic oil, motor oil and gear oil from lube oil storage bins that were not labeled with hazard warnings.   (b) At the Rig 1 drilling site located at Adele DuBose #2 Well in Gonzales County, Texas, on or about March 22, 2012 and at times prior thereto, employees were dispensing combustible diesel fuel from a skid-mount storage tank for use in mud mixing operations, and the tank was not labeled with the hazard warnings.  (c) At the Rig 1 drilling site located at Adele DuBose #2 Well in Gonzales County, Texas, on or about March 22, 2012 and at times prior thereto, in the Parts House, plastic containers with brushes soaking in flammable solvent were not labeled with hazard warnings.  Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the date of this citation, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace is labeled, tagged or marked with the appropriate hazard warnings.  .
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 G01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Sep 11, 2012
Abate by
Sep 12, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,700 · Current $1,620 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1080166025909965

29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): The employer did not have a material safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical which they used:   At the Rig 1 drilling site located at Adele DuBose #2 Well in Gonzales County, Texas, on or about March 22, 2012 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not have material safety data sheets for employees who were using hazardous chemicals for rig maintenance including, but not limited to, flammable Crown Xylol (Xylene)  Thinner, flammable Sunnyside Denatured Alcohol, Sigma Vikote 56 Safety Red, Rust-Oleum Bar-B-Q Black (petroleum distillates), and Jones Blair 45015 Acrylithane C-HS Enamel Neutral Base and 99979 Acrylithane C-HS Catalyst (1,6-diisocyanate hexane; ethyl benzene).  Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the date of this citation, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that the employer has a material safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical which they use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1620
  • — Z (S) $2700

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 11, 2012
Abate by
Sep 12, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 22609010

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  At the Rig 1 drilling site located at Adele DuBose #2 Well in Gonzales County, Texas, on or about March 22, 2012 and at times prior thereto, where the employer required use of Moldex 2300 N95 series filtering facepiece respirators for employees who were adding dry bulk materiasl to mud mixers containing hazardous components including, but not limited to, crystalline silica and caustic soda, the employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program.  Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the date of this citation, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that a written respiratory protection program that includes the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures is established and implemented for required respirator use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 F02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 11, 2012
Abate by
Sep 12, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 22609010

29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): The employer did not ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator was fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model or make) is used, and at least annually thereafter:  At the Rig 1 drilling site located at Adele DuBose #2 Well in Gonzales County, Texas, on or about March 22, 2012 and at times prior thereto, where employees were required to wear Moldex 2300 N95 series filtering facepiece respirators while adding bags of dry chemicals to mud mixing hoppers containing hazardous components including crystalline silica and caustic soda, employees were not provided initial and annual respirator fit testing.   Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the date of this citation, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator is fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model or make) is used, and at least annually thereafter.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Eastham Drilling INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 334065034.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.