Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LIPPMANN-MILWAUKEE, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LIPPMANN-MILWAUKEE, INC. in 3271 E. VAN NORMAN AVE, CUDAHY, WI 53110 (NAICS 333131). OSHA activity number 334153236.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Lippmann-Milwaukee, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Lippmann-Milwaukee, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3271 E. VAN NORMAN AVE
City
CUDAHY
State
WI
ZIP
53110
Mailing
3271 EAST VAN NORMAN AVENUE, CUDAHY, WI 53110
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333131
Employees
110
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 13, 2012
Abate by
Aug 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $2,500 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1):   The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees  (a)  In Bay 1, Renfroe Model FR Clamp (1/2 Ton, 0-3/4") was used to move steel plates.  The clamps were not used in accordance with the instruction manual in that it was used for vertical lifts and turned into a horizontal lift.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2500
  • — Z (S) $6300

1910.23 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 13, 2012
Abate by
Nov 30, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,295 · Current $1,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1):   Open-sided floor(s) or platform(s) 4 feet or more above the adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded by standard railings (or the equivalent as specified in 29 CFR 1910.23(e)(3)(i) through (v)), on all open sides:  (a)  In Bay 3 East, the Impacter model 4800 had final assembly on the platform which was approximately 6' above the floor.  Employees used the scissors lift to the elevation and then went around to get on the platform.  Employees were exposed to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1500
  • — Z (S) $2295

1910.107 B10

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 13, 2012
Abate by
Aug 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,825 · Current $1,900 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(c)(6):   Electrical wiring and equipment not subject to deposits of combustible residues but located in a spraying area as herein defined were not explosion-proof type approved for Class I, group D locations and did not otherwise conform to the provisions of subpart S of this part, for Class I, Division 1, Hazardous Locations:  (a)  In bay 4, dual paint booths used to apply an oil-based primer had fluorescent lamps which were not approved for the location exposing employee to fire hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1900
  • — Z (S) $3825

1910.176 B

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 13, 2012
Abate by
Aug 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,060 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.176(b):   Storage of material created a hazard:  (a)  In the Shipping/Receiving/Storage Area, Column 3E; employees were exposed to struck-by hazards from damaged racking.  The storage racking stored various replacement parts.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $3060

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 13, 2012
Abate by
Aug 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,825 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1):   Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees from hazard(s) created by:  (a)  In Bay 1, Column 3L; the LeBlond Regal Lathe was missing one of the holding-device guard (chuck guard) exposing employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $3825

1910.213 H04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 13, 2012
Abate by
Aug 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,825 · Current $1,900 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.213(h)(4):   Radial saw(s) were not installed in a manner so as to cause the cutting head to return gently to the starting position when released by the operator:  (a)  The Shipping/Receiving/Storage area, Column 4A; a Delta Milwaukee Multiplex radial arm saw was used to cut wood for shipping crates.  The blade did not return in the original position exposing employees to laceration/amputation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1900
  • — Z (S) $3825

1910.215 A04

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 13, 2012
Abate by
Aug 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,590 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4):   Work rest(s) on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one eighth inch:  (a)  In the Maintenance Area, an 8" Westwood bench grinder was missing the work rest exposing employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $4590

1910.215 B09

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 13, 2012
Abate by
Aug 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9):   Guard for abrasive wheel machine where the operator stands in front of the machine was not constructed so that the peripheral protecting member could be adjusted to the constantly decreasing diameter of the wheel:  (a)  In the Maintenance Area, an 8" Westwood bench grinder was missing the tongue guard exposing employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C06 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 13, 2012
Abate by
Aug 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(ii):   The employer did not certify that periodic inspections of the energy control procedures had been performed:  (a) The employer did not certify the periodic inspections were being conducted during times such as but not limited to: the shutdown of the facility and preventative maintenance was performed on the equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 F05

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 13, 2012
Abate by
Aug 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5):   The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged, or marked with the identity and appropriate hazard warnings regarding the chemicals contained therein:  (a)  In Bay 3, Column 6X;  a squeeze bottle filled with hydraulic fluid was not labeled.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Lippmann-Milwaukee, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 334153236.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.