Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: WESTERN FRAMING

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of WESTERN FRAMING in SE CORNER OF NW 135TH AND N. MACARTHUR BLVD, OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73142 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 334723186.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Western Framing — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Western Framing is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
WESTERN FRAMING
Site address
SE CORNER OF NW 135TH AND N. MACARTHUR BLVD
City
OKLAHOMA CITY
State
OK
ZIP
73142
Mailing
5009 N. VERMONT AVE, OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73112
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.25 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jul 12, 2012
Abate by
Jul 19, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
29 CFR 1926.25(a):     During the course of construction, alteration, or repairs, form and scrap lumber with protruding nails, and all other debris, were not kept cleared from work areas, passageways, and stairs, in and around buildings or other structures.    On or about March 14, 2012, the employer did not ensure all scrap lumber with protruding nails and debris were kept clear from the work area and passageways around the building exposing employees to impalement hazards, slips, trips, and falls.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2400

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 12, 2012
Abate by
Jul 13, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $4,200
29 CFR 1926.100(a):     Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets.    On or about March 14, 2012, the employer did not ensure all employees working in areas where there is a possibility of a head injury from falling or flying objects were protected through the use of protective helmets exposing the employees to a struck-by hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4200

1926.451 A06

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 12, 2012
Abate by
Jul 19, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $4,200
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(6):     Scaffolds were not designed by a qualified person.  Non-mandatory Appendix A to this subpart contains examples of criteria that will enable an employer to comply with paragraph (a) of this section.    On or about March 14, 2012, the employer did not ensure a scaffold built along side of a building was designed by a qualified person exposing employees to fall and struck-by hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4200

1926.451 F07

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 12, 2012
Abate by
Jul 19, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7):     Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered only under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration.     On or about March 14, 2012, the employer did not ensure a scaffold built along side of a building was erected under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 12, 2012
Abate by
Jul 19, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(2):     Except as provided in paragraphs (b)(2)(i) and (b)(2)(ii) of this section, each scaffold platform and walkway were not at least 18 inches (46 cm) wide.    On or about March 14, 2012, the employer did not ensure the scaffold platform was at least 18 inches wide exposing the employees to a fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2400

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 12, 2012
Abate by
Jul 19, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1):     When scaffold platforms are more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from another scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface were not used.     On or about March 14, 2012, the employer did not ensure scaffold platforms more than 2 feet above a point of access safe access was used exposing employees to a fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 F03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 12, 2012
Abate by
Jul 19, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $4,200
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3):     Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity.    On or about March 14, 2012, the employer did not ensure the scaffold and scaffold components were inspected for visible defects by a competent person exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4200

1926.451 F04

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 12, 2012
Abate by
Jul 19, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(4):     Any part of a scaffold damaged or weakened such that its strength is less than that required by paragraph (a) of this section were not immediately repaired or replaced, braced to meet those provisions, or removed from service until repaired.    On or about March 14, 2012, the employer did not ensure that any scaffold components damaged or weakened were replaced or repaired exposing employees to a fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 12, 2012
Abate by
Jul 13, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $3,000
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1):     "Unprotected sides and edges." Each employee on a walking/working surface (horizontal and vertical surface) with an unprotected side or edge which is 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level  were not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.    On or about March 14, 2012, the employer did not ensure each employee, on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge, was protected from a fall hazard exposing employees to a fall of more than 6 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3000

View Western Framing's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 334723186.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.