BETHEL, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: BURNDY, LLC
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of BURNDY, LLC in 185 GLASSY PLAIN STREET, BETHEL, CT 06801 (NAICS 334417). OSHA activity number 334887791.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BURNDY, LLC
- Site address
- 185 GLASSY PLAIN STREET
- City
- BETHEL
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06801
- Mailing
- 185 GLASSY PLAIN STREET, BETHEL, CT 06801
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Union (A)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 334417
- Employees
- 79
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.304 F01 IV
- Issued
- Dec 3, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.304(f)(1)(iv): Overcurrent devices for circuits rated 600 volts, nominal, or less, were located in the vicinity of easily ignitable material and not readily accessible to each employee or authorized building management personnel Warehouse: The electrical panels/boxes for the circuit breakers having built-in over current protection devices were blocked by large battery chargers that were used to charge the batteries for powered industrial trucks.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $1500
- · Z (S) $4000
1910.1025 D09
- Issued
- Dec 3, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 22, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,000 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(d)(9): The employerdid not use a method of monitoring and analysis which has an accuracy (to a confidence level of 95%) of not less than plus or minus 20 percent for airborne concentrations of lead equal to or greater than 30 ug/m(3). Facility: The employer did not ensure through visual observation and instruction that the Gillian BDX II Abatement Air Sampler used in the personal sampling of lead had been appropriately calibrated prior to use.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $1500
- · Z (S) $3000
1910.1027 D06
- Issued
- Dec 3, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 22, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1027(d)(6): The employer did not use a method of monitoring and analysis that had an accuracy of not less than plus or minus 25 percent (+25%), with a confidence level of 95 percent, for airborne concentrations of cadmium at or above the action level, the permissible exposure limit (PEL), and the separate engineering control limit (SECAL). Facility: The employer did not ensure through visual observation and instruction that the Gillian BDX II Abatement Air Sampler used in the personal sampling of cadmium had been appropriately calibrated prior to use.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Dec 3, 2012
- Abate by
- Dec 28, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator were not annually fit tested. Facility: The employees, required to wear 3M 8293 facepiece respirators were not fit tested at least on an annual basis.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.134 C03
- Issued
- Dec 3, 2012
- Abate by
- Dec 28, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(3): The employer did not designate a program administrator who was qualified by appropriate training or experience to administer or oversee the respiratory protection program and to conduct the required evaluations of program effectiveness: Facility: The employer did not ensure through designating a qualified and experience respirator protection program administrator that the respiratory protection program was not only effective, but also appropriately administered.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections at Burndy, LLC
View Burndy, LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 334417)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 334887791.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.