Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: BURNDY, LLC

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of BURNDY, LLC in 185 GLASSY PLAIN STREET, BETHEL, CT 06801 (NAICS 334417). OSHA activity number 334887791.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Burndy, LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Burndy, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
BURNDY, LLC
Site address
185 GLASSY PLAIN STREET
City
BETHEL
State
CT
ZIP
06801
Mailing
185 GLASSY PLAIN STREET, BETHEL, CT 06801
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Union (A)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
334417
Employees
79
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.304 F01 IV

Other-than-serious 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $1,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.304(f)(1)(iv):  Overcurrent devices for circuits rated 600 volts, nominal, or less, were located in the vicinity of easily ignitable material and not readily accessible to each employee or authorized building management personnel      Warehouse: The electrical panels/boxes for the circuit breakers having built-in over current protection devices were blocked by large battery chargers that were used to charge the batteries for powered industrial trucks.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $1500
  • · Z (S) $4000

1910.1025 D09

Other-than-serious 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2012
Abate by
Jan 22, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $1,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1025(d)(9):  The employerdid not use a method of monitoring and analysis which has an accuracy (to a confidence level of 95%) of not less than plus or minus 20 percent for airborne concentrations of lead equal to or greater than 30 ug/m(3).    Facility:  The employer did not ensure through visual observation and instruction that the Gillian BDX II Abatement Air Sampler used in the personal sampling of lead had been appropriately calibrated prior to use.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $1500
  • · Z (S) $3000

1910.1027 D06

Other-than-serious 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2012
Abate by
Jan 22, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1027(d)(6):  The employer did not use a method of monitoring and analysis that had an accuracy of not less than plus or minus 25 percent (+25%), with a confidence level of 95 percent, for airborne concentrations of cadmium at or above the action level, the permissible exposure limit (PEL), and the separate engineering control limit (SECAL).    Facility: The employer did not ensure through visual observation and instruction that the Gillian BDX II Abatement Air Sampler used in the personal sampling of cadmium had been appropriately calibrated prior to use.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Other-than-serious 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2012
Abate by
Dec 28, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator were not annually fit tested.    Facility: The employees, required to wear 3M 8293 facepiece respirators were not fit tested at least on an annual basis.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.134 C03

Other-than-serious 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2012
Abate by
Dec 28, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(3): The employer did not designate a program administrator who was qualified by appropriate training or experience to administer or oversee the respiratory protection program and to conduct the required evaluations of program effectiveness:    Facility: The employer did not ensure through designating a qualified and experience respirator protection program administrator that the respiratory protection program was not only effective, but also appropriately administered.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View Burndy, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 334887791.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.