Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: RICARDO LOPEZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RICARDO LOPEZ in 1801 HIGH COUNTRY, WESTLAKE, TX 76262 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 334930591.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Ricardo Lopez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ricardo Lopez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
RICARDO LOPEZ
Site address
1801 HIGH COUNTRY
City
WESTLAKE
State
TX
ZIP
76262
Mailing
3012 8TH AVE., FORT WORTH, TX 76110
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.25 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Nov 28, 2012
Abate by
Dec 24, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1926.25(a):  During the course of construction, alteration, or repairs,  debris was not kept cleared from work areas, passageways, and stairs, in and around buildings or other structures:    (a)  On or about 6/29/12, at the front of the residence, stones and other debris were not kept cleared from the work areas, exposing employees to tripping and fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.403 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Nov 28, 2012
Abate by
Dec 24, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.403(b)(1):  Employer did not ensure that electrical equipment was free from recognized hazards that were likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees:    (a)  On or about 6/29/12, at the southeast corner of the property, the employer did not ensure that the electrical box that supplied power for the tools used by the employees was enclosed or guarded against incidental contact, exposing the employees to electrical hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.403 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Nov 28, 2012
Abate by
Dec 24, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.403(b)(2):  Listed, labeled, or certified equipment was not installed and used in accordance with instructions included in the listing, labeling, or certification:      (a)  On or about 6/29/12, near the southeast corner of the property, an outlet box was used to connect power tools to the electric meter and was not used in accordance with manufacturer's instructions and specifications.  Employees who used the tools plugged into this box were exposed to hazards of electric shock or electrocution.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.403 I02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Nov 28, 2012
Abate by
Dec 24, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.403(i)(2)(i):  Live parts of electric equipment operating at 50 volts or more were not guarded against accidental contact by cabinets or other forms of enclosures, nor by any of the means listed in subparagraphs (A) through (D) of this paragraph:    (a) On or about 6/29/12, near the southeast corner of the property, energized electrical wires were not guarded to prevent accidental contact by the employees.  Employees were exposed to electric shock or electrocution.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.405 D

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Nov 28, 2012
Abate by
Dec 24, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.405(d):  Panelboards mounted in cabinets, cutout boxes or enclosures designed for the purpose were not dead front:    (a)  On or about 6/29/12, near the southeast corner of the property, the live wires were accessible by unqualified personnel and were not dead fronted.  Employees were exposed to the hazards of electric shock.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Nov 28, 2012
Abate by
Dec 24, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports:     (a)  On or about 6/29/12, at the front of the residence, the top level of the scaffold platform was not fully planked, exposing employees to fall hazards greater than 10 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.451 F04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Nov 28, 2012
Abate by
Dec 24, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(4):  Part(s) of a scaffold that were damaged or weakened, such that the scaffold's strength was less than that required by paragraph (a) of this section, were not immediately repaired, replaced, braced to meet those provisions, nor removed from service until repaired:    (a)  On or about 6/29/12, at the front of the residence,  planks used in the top level of the scaffold were split and were still being used as part of the scaffold platform, exposing employees to fall hazards greater than 10 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Nov 28, 2012
Abate by
Dec 24, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1):  When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Crossbraces were used as a means of access:    (a)  On or about 6/29/12, on the front of the residence, a ladder was not provided for employees to use to access the second platform of the scaffold.  Employees were exposed to fall hazards greater than 10 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Nov 28, 2012
Abate by
Dec 24, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii):  Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section:    (a)  On or about 6/29/12, at the front of the residence, the employees were working from the second level of the scaffold and were not protected from falling by the use of guardrails or other fall protection systems.  The employees were exposed to falls greater than 10 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

View Ricardo Lopez's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 334930591.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.