EVANSTON, IL —
OSHA Inspection: MANGO CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MANGO CONSTRUCTION, INC. in 138 CALLAN, EVANSTON, IL 60202 (NAICS 237110). OSHA activity number 334946787.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MANGO CONSTRUCTION, INC.
- Site address
- 138 CALLAN
- City
- EVANSTON
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 60202
- Mailing
- 5827 S. MASSASOIT, CHICAGO, IL 60638
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 237110
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Aug 10, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 24, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part: a) Mango Construction, Inc. did not create, implement or maintain a safety and health program at the establishment to aid in accident prevention responsibilities. **In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).**
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Aug 10, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 24, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe condition(s) and the regulation(s) applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazard(s) or other exposure to illness or injury: a) Employer did not ensure that its employees were trained and knowledgeable of recognizing and minimizing exposure the trenching and excavation hazards of the site, such as struck by, overhead and cave-in. **In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).**
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.651 K01
- Issued
- Aug 10, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 24, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.651(k)(1): Daily inspections of excavations, the adjacent areas, and protective systems were not made by a competent person for evidence of a situation that could have resulted in possible cave-ins, indications of failure of protective systems: a) The employer did not provide a competent person to inspect the excavation site and its adjacent structures to recognize, minimize or eliminate any exposure to hazards, such as cave-in, struck by and overhead. **In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).**
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Aug 10, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 17, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns: a) Employees were not provided head protection while working within the unprotected excavation. **In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).**
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1200
1926.652 A01
- Issued
- Aug 10, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 17, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.652(a)(1): Each employee in an excavation was not protected from cave-ins by an adequate protective system designed in accordance with paragraph (b) or (c) or 29 CFR 1926.652: The employer did not ensure that its employees were protected from cave-in hazards while working within the approximately 6ft 6ft 7in. deep excavation. **In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).**
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2400
1926.651 D
- Issued
- Aug 10, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.651(d): Employees exposed to public vehicular traffic were not provided with a warning vest or other suitable garments marked with or made of reflectorized or high-visibility material: a) The employer did not ensure that its employees were protected from the public vehicular traffic of the residential street by means of high visibility apparel. **No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item.**
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Mango Construction, INC.
View Mango Construction, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 237110)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 334946787.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.