Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: TECHO-BLOC INCORPORATED

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of TECHO-BLOC INCORPORATED in 852 PENNSYLVANIA AVE, PEN ARGYL, PA 18072 (NAICS 327331). OSHA activity number 335248936.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Techo-Bloc Incorporated — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Techo-Bloc Incorporated is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
852 PENNSYLVANIA AVE
City
PEN ARGYL
State
PA
ZIP
18072
Mailing
852 PENNSYLVANIA AVE, PEN ARGYL, PA 18072
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
327331
Employees
80
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Nov 8, 2012
Abate by
Apr 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,975 · Current $2,083 Reduced

Hazardous substances 8110

29 CFR 1910.95(b)(1): When employees were subjected to sound exceeding those listed in Table G-16, feasible engineering controls were not utilized:  a) Hess Machine Block Check: An employee, Operator in Training, was exposed to continuous noise at 180.1 % of the permissible exposure limit of 90 dBA or an eight-hour time-weighted average of 94.2 dBA. This exposure was observed over a 460 minute sampling period on July 26, 2012. Zero exposure was assumed for any unsampled time. The employer did not implement feasible administrative or engineering controls to reduce employee exposure to occupational noise, on or about July 26, 2012.  Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date.  The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states that employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2082.5
  • — Z (S) $2975

1910.95 K01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Nov 8, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,974 · Current $2,082 Reduced

Hazardous substances 81108111

29 CFR 1910.95(k)(1): The employer did not train each employee who is exposed to noise at or above an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.95(k):  a) Hess Machine Block Check: An employee, Operator in Training, was exposed to continuous noise at 193.2% of the permissiblel exposure  level of 90 dBA or an eight-hour time-weighted average of 94.7 dBA. This exposure was observed over a 460 minute sampling period on July 26, 2012. Zero exposure was assumed for any unsampled time. The employee was not trained on the effects of noise, on or about July 26, 2012.  Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date.  The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states that employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2081.8
  • — Z (S) $2974

1910.132 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Nov 8, 2012
Abate by
Nov 29, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,380 · Current $1,666 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment, including personal protective equipment for eyes, face, head, and extremities, protective clothing, respiratory devices, and protective shields and barriers, were not provided and used whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered:  a) Hess Machine #1: Employees required to remove wet cement from the hopper were not provided personal protective equipment for their arms and upper body, exposing employees to chemical burns, on or about July 10, 2012.  Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date.  The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states that employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1666
  • — Z (S) $2380

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Nov 8, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,380 · Current $1,666 Reduced

Hazardous substances 05779010

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): The employer did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new physical or health hazard the employees had not previously been trained about was introduced into their work area:  a) Production Area: Temporary employees were not provided information on the hazards of the chemicals in their work areas or the location of the material safety data sheets at the time of their initial assignment, exposing the employees to burns and respiratory disorders, on or about July 10, 2012.  No abatement certification or documentation required.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1666
  • — Z (S) $2380

1910.1200 H03 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 50 exposed
Issued
Nov 8, 2012
Abate by
Dec 14, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 05779010

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(ii): Employee training did not include the physical and health hazards of the chemicals in the work area:  a) Production Area: Employees exposed to wet cement and silica dust were not provided training on the hazards of specific chemicals in their work area exposing the employees to chemical burns and respiratory disorders, on or about July 10, 2012.  Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date.  The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states that employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 C02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 8, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9010

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible:  a) Production Area: Temporary employees were allowed to wear dust masks voluntarily and were not provided Appendix D, on or about July 10, 2012.   No abatement certification or documentation required.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Techo-Bloc Incorporated's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335248936.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.