PEN ARGYL, PA —
OSHA Inspection: TECHO-BLOC INCORPORATED
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of TECHO-BLOC INCORPORATED in 852 PENNSYLVANIA AVE, PEN ARGYL, PA 18072 (NAICS 327331). OSHA activity number 335248936.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- TECHO-BLOC INCORPORATED
- Site address
- 852 PENNSYLVANIA AVE
- City
- PEN ARGYL
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 18072
- Mailing
- 852 PENNSYLVANIA AVE, PEN ARGYL, PA 18072
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 327331
- Employees
- 80
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.95 B01
- Issued
- Nov 8, 2012
- Abate by
- Apr 30, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,975 · Current $2,083 Reduced
8110
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(b)(1): When employees were subjected to sound exceeding those listed in Table G-16, feasible engineering controls were not utilized: a) Hess Machine Block Check: An employee, Operator in Training, was exposed to continuous noise at 180.1 % of the permissible exposure limit of 90 dBA or an eight-hour time-weighted average of 94.2 dBA. This exposure was observed over a 460 minute sampling period on July 26, 2012. Zero exposure was assumed for any unsampled time. The employer did not implement feasible administrative or engineering controls to reduce employee exposure to occupational noise, on or about July 26, 2012. Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states that employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2082.5
- — Z (S) $2975
1910.95 K01
- Issued
- Nov 8, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,974 · Current $2,082 Reduced
81108111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(k)(1): The employer did not train each employee who is exposed to noise at or above an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.95(k): a) Hess Machine Block Check: An employee, Operator in Training, was exposed to continuous noise at 193.2% of the permissiblel exposure level of 90 dBA or an eight-hour time-weighted average of 94.7 dBA. This exposure was observed over a 460 minute sampling period on July 26, 2012. Zero exposure was assumed for any unsampled time. The employee was not trained on the effects of noise, on or about July 26, 2012. Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states that employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2081.8
- — Z (S) $2974
1910.132 A
- Issued
- Nov 8, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 29, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,380 · Current $1,666 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment, including personal protective equipment for eyes, face, head, and extremities, protective clothing, respiratory devices, and protective shields and barriers, were not provided and used whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered: a) Hess Machine #1: Employees required to remove wet cement from the hopper were not provided personal protective equipment for their arms and upper body, exposing employees to chemical burns, on or about July 10, 2012. Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states that employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1666
- — Z (S) $2380
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Nov 8, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,380 · Current $1,666 Reduced
05779010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): The employer did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new physical or health hazard the employees had not previously been trained about was introduced into their work area: a) Production Area: Temporary employees were not provided information on the hazards of the chemicals in their work areas or the location of the material safety data sheets at the time of their initial assignment, exposing the employees to burns and respiratory disorders, on or about July 10, 2012. No abatement certification or documentation required.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1666
- — Z (S) $2380
1910.1200 H03 II
- Issued
- Nov 8, 2012
- Abate by
- Dec 14, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
05779010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(ii): Employee training did not include the physical and health hazards of the chemicals in the work area: a) Production Area: Employees exposed to wet cement and silica dust were not provided training on the hazards of specific chemicals in their work area exposing the employees to chemical burns and respiratory disorders, on or about July 10, 2012. Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states that employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 C02 I
- Issued
- Nov 8, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible: a) Production Area: Temporary employees were allowed to wear dust masks voluntarily and were not provided Appendix D, on or about July 10, 2012. No abatement certification or documentation required.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Techo-Bloc Incorporated
View Techo-Bloc Incorporated's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 327331)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335248936.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.