FREEPORT, TX —
OSHA Inspection: BRAZOS PIPE & STEEL FABRICATORS, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of BRAZOS PIPE & STEEL FABRICATORS, INC. in 3135 HWY 332 EAST, FREEPORT, TX 77541 (NAICS 331210). OSHA activity number 335661989.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BRAZOS PIPE & STEEL FABRICATORS, INC.
- Site address
- 3135 HWY 332 EAST
- City
- FREEPORT
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77541
- Mailing
- 3135 HWY 332 EAST, FREEPORT, TX 77541
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 331210
- Employees
- 60
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4900.00 · Current $2940.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator was competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l) On or about August 8, 2012, at the facility; an employee operating powered industrial trucks was not trained. This condition exposed the employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2940
- — Z (S) $4900
1910.179 J02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4900.00 · Current $2940.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(2): The following items were not be inspected for defects at intervals as defined in paragraph (j)(1)(ii) of this section or as specifically indicated, including observation during operation for any defects which might appear between regular inspections: On or about August 8, 2012, at the facility; employees were operating overhead cranes where frequent inspections had not been performed to detect defects. This condition exposed the employees to struck-by hazards. a) Bay 5, Overhead crane 5A, was not frequently inspected to detect defects such as broken pendant controls and missing hooks and latches. b) Bay 5, Overhead crane 5B, was not frequently inspected to detect defects. c) Bay 5, Overhead crane 5C, was not frequently inspected to detect defects such as broken pendant controls and missing hooks and latches. d) Bay 4, Overhead crane 4A, was not frequently inspected to detect defects. e) Bay 4, Overhead crane 4B, was not frequently inspected to detect defects. f) Bay 3, Overhead crane 3A, was not frequently inspected to detect defects. g) Bay 3, Overhead crane 3B, was not frequently inspected to detect defects. h) Bay 2, Overhead crane 2A, was not frequently inspected to detect defects. i) Bay 2, Overhead crane 2B, was not frequently inspected to detect defects. j) Bay 1, Overhead crane 1A, was not frequently inspected to detect defects such as broken pendant controls and missing hooks and latches. k) Bay 1, Overhead crane 1B, was not frequently inspected to detect defects
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2940
- — Z (S) $4900
1910.179 J03
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(3): Complete inspections of the crane was not being performed at intervals as generally defined in paragraph (j)(1)(ii)(b) of this section: On or about August 8, 2012, at the facility; employees were operating overhead cranes where periodic inspections had not been performed to detect defects. This condition exposed the employees to struck-by hazards. a) Bay 5, Overhead crane 5A, was not periodically inspected to detect defects. b) Bay 5, Overhead crane 5B, was not periodically inspected to detect defects. c) Bay 5, Overhead crane 5C, was not periodically inspected to detect defects. d) Bay 4, Overhead crane 4A, was not periodically inspected to detect defects. e) Bay 4, Overhead crane 4B, was not periodically inspected to detect defects. f) Bay 3, Overhead crane 3A, was not periodically inspected to detect defects. g) Bay 3, Overhead crane 3B, was not periodically inspected to detect defects. h) Bay 2, Overhead crane 2A, was not periodically inspected to detect defects. i) Bay 2, Overhead crane 2B, was not periodically inspected to detect defects. j) Bay 1, Overhead crane 1A, was not periodically inspected to detect defects. k) Bay 1, Overhead crane 1B, was not periodically inspected to detect defects.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.180 D06
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.180(d)(6): Monthly, dated and signed inspection records and reports for truck crane(s) were not provided for critical items such as (but not limited to) brakes, crane hooks and ropes: On or about August 8, 2012, Southside of Bay 5; the employer did not keep crane inspection certification records for a Grove RT58 Rough Terrain Crane Model: H35D-03 S/N: H2X351N0479635. This condition exposed the employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4900.00 · Current $2940.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s): On or about June 8, 2012, at the facility; employees were operating machinery where the point of operation was not guarded. This condition exposed the employees to a struck-by and caught-between hazards. a) Bay 2 Area, a Hawthorne Ironworker Punch Press point of operation was not guarded. b) Bay 2 Area, a Hawthorne Ironworker Punch Press point of operation was not guarded.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2940
- — Z (S) $4900
1910.243 C03
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4900.00 · Current $2940.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.243(c)(3): Abrasive wheels used on vertical portable grinder(s) (right angle head grinders) were not provided with safety guard(s) having a maximum exposure angle of 180 degrees and located between the operator and wheel: On or about August 8, 2012, Northside of Bay 5; employees were using hand held grinders that were not equipped with safety guards. This condition exposed the employees to a struck-by hazard. a) Makita Angle Grinder Serial # 160690A was not equipped with a safety guard. b) Dewalt Angle Grinder was not equipped with a safety guard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2940
- — Z (S) $4900
1910.303 F02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4900.00 · Current $2940.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(f)(2): Each service, feeder, and branch circuit, at its disconnecting means or overcurrent device, was not legibly marked to indicate its purpose, nor located and arranged so the purpose was evident: Northside Wall Center of Shop; on or about June 11, 2012, the disconnecting means or overcurrent device of each service, feeder, and branch circuit was not marked to indicate its purpose. This condition exposed the employees to electrical hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2940
- — Z (S) $4900
1910.305 B01 II
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii): Unused openings in boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed: At the facility; on or about June 8, 2012, unused openings in electrical boxes, cabinets, and fittings were not effectively closed. This condition exposed the employees to electrical hazards. a) Northside Wall at the Center of Shop; an unused opening in a breaker cabinet was not closed. b) Northside Wall at the Center of Shop; an unused opening on a switch cabinet was not effectively closed. c) Northside of Bay 5; an unused opening on a switch cabinet was not effectively closed.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.141 A03 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $700.00 · Current $350.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.141(a)(3)(i): Places of employment were not kept clean to the extent that the nature of the work allowed: Eastside of the shop; on or about June 8, 2012, restrooms were not kept clean to the extent that the work allowed.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $350
- — Z (O) $700
1910.180 H04 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $700.00 · Current $358.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.180(h)(4)(i): The employer did not ensure that the operator kept his position at the controls while the load was suspended: On or about August 8, 2012, Southside of Bay 5; the operator of a Grove RT58 Rough Terrain Crane Model: H35D-03 S/N: H2X351N0479635 left the controls while a load was suspended.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $358
- — Z (O) $700
More inspections at BRAZOS PIPE & STEEL FABRICATORS, INC.
FREEPORT, TX—2022-06-22 00:00:00
BRAZOS PIPE & STEEL FABRICATORS, INC.
FREEPORT, TX—2013-05-31 00:00:00
BRAZOS PIPE & STEEL FABRICATORS, INC.
FREEPORT, TX—1985-03-05
BRAZOS PIPE & STEEL FABRICATORS INC
View BRAZOS PIPE & STEEL FABRICATORS, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 331210)
MUSCODA, WI—2026-07-10
SCOT INDUSTRIES, INC
BOISE, ID—2026-07-07
FARWEST STEEL CORPORATION
ANCHORAGE, AK—2026-07-01
STEELFAB
ANCHORAGE, AK—2026-07-01
STEELFAB
SOUTH LYON, MI—2026-06-25
MICHIGAN SEAMLESS TUBE LLC
More inspections in TX
SPRING, TX—2026-07-10
DORSTENER WIRE TECH INC.
FORT WORTH, TX—2026-07-10
RC PROFESSIONAL ROOFING OF TEXAS LLC
CYPRESS, TX—2026-07-10
FEDERICO CARVAJAL GARCIA
SAN ANTONIO, TX—2026-07-10
ED LONG'S METAL WORKS
SAN ANTONIO, TX—2026-07-09
WAREHOUSE RACK COMPANY, LP
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335661989.