Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: BRAZOS PIPE & STEEL FABRICATORS, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of BRAZOS PIPE & STEEL FABRICATORS, INC. in 3135 HWY 332 EAST, FREEPORT, TX 77541 (NAICS 331210). OSHA activity number 335661989.

Watch Brazos Pipe & Steel Fabricators, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Brazos Pipe & Steel Fabricators, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3135 HWY 332 EAST
City
FREEPORT
State
TX
ZIP
77541
Mailing
3135 HWY 332 EAST, FREEPORT, TX 77541
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
331210
Employees
60
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4900.00 · Current $2940.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator was competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l)    On or about August 8, 2012, at the facility; an employee operating powered industrial trucks was not trained. This condition exposed the employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2940
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.179 J02

Serious Gravity 10 11 instances 20 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4900.00 · Current $2940.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(2): The following items were not be inspected for defects at intervals as defined in paragraph (j)(1)(ii) of this section or as specifically indicated, including observation during operation for any defects which might appear between regular inspections:    On or about August 8, 2012, at the facility; employees were operating overhead cranes where frequent inspections had not been performed to detect defects. This condition exposed the employees to struck-by hazards.     a) Bay 5, Overhead crane 5A, was not frequently inspected to detect defects such as broken pendant controls and missing hooks and latches.     b) Bay 5, Overhead crane 5B, was not frequently inspected to detect defects.     c) Bay 5, Overhead crane 5C, was not frequently inspected to detect defects such as broken pendant controls and missing hooks and latches.     d) Bay 4, Overhead crane 4A, was not frequently inspected to detect defects.     e) Bay 4, Overhead crane 4B, was not frequently inspected to detect defects.     f) Bay 3, Overhead crane 3A, was not frequently inspected to detect defects.     g) Bay 3, Overhead crane 3B, was not frequently inspected to detect defects.     h) Bay 2, Overhead crane 2A, was not frequently inspected to detect defects.     i) Bay 2, Overhead crane 2B, was not frequently inspected to detect defects.     j) Bay 1, Overhead crane 1A, was not frequently inspected to detect defects such as broken pendant controls and missing hooks and latches.    k) Bay 1, Overhead crane 1B, was not frequently inspected to detect defects
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2940
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.179 J03

Serious Gravity 10 11 instances 20 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(3): Complete inspections of the crane was not being performed at intervals as generally defined in paragraph (j)(1)(ii)(b) of this section:    On or about August 8, 2012, at the facility; employees were operating overhead cranes where periodic inspections had not been performed to detect defects. This condition exposed the employees to struck-by hazards.     a) Bay 5, Overhead crane 5A, was not periodically inspected to detect defects.     b) Bay 5, Overhead crane 5B, was not periodically inspected to detect defects.     c) Bay 5, Overhead crane 5C, was not periodically inspected to detect defects.     d) Bay 4, Overhead crane 4A, was not periodically inspected to detect defects.     e) Bay 4, Overhead crane 4B, was not periodically inspected to detect defects.     f) Bay 3, Overhead crane 3A, was not periodically inspected to detect defects.     g) Bay 3, Overhead crane 3B, was not periodically inspected to detect defects.     h) Bay 2, Overhead crane 2A, was not periodically inspected to detect defects.     i) Bay 2, Overhead crane 2B, was not periodically inspected to detect defects.     j) Bay 1, Overhead crane 1A, was not periodically inspected to detect defects.    k) Bay 1, Overhead crane 1B, was not periodically inspected to detect defects.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.180 D06

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.180(d)(6): Monthly, dated and signed inspection records and reports for truck crane(s) were not provided for critical items such as (but not limited to) brakes, crane hooks and ropes:    On or about August 8, 2012, Southside of Bay 5; the employer did not keep crane inspection certification records for a Grove RT58 Rough Terrain Crane Model: H35D-03 S/N: H2X351N0479635. This condition exposed the employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4900.00 · Current $2940.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):    On or about June 8, 2012, at the facility; employees were operating machinery where the point of operation was not guarded. This condition exposed the employees to a struck-by and caught-between hazards.     a) Bay 2 Area, a Hawthorne Ironworker Punch Press point of operation was not guarded.     b) Bay 2 Area, a Hawthorne Ironworker Punch Press point of operation was not guarded.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2940
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.243 C03

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4900.00 · Current $2940.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.243(c)(3): Abrasive wheels used on vertical portable grinder(s) (right angle head grinders) were not provided with safety guard(s) having a maximum exposure angle of 180 degrees and located between the operator and wheel:    On or about August 8, 2012, Northside of Bay 5; employees were using hand held grinders that were not equipped with safety guards. This condition exposed the employees to a struck-by hazard.     a) Makita Angle Grinder Serial # 160690A was not equipped with a safety guard.     b) Dewalt Angle Grinder was not equipped with a safety guard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2940
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.303 F02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4900.00 · Current $2940.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(f)(2): Each service, feeder, and branch circuit, at its disconnecting means or overcurrent device, was not legibly marked to indicate its purpose, nor located and arranged so the purpose was evident:    Northside Wall Center of Shop; on or about June 11, 2012, the disconnecting means or overcurrent device of each service, feeder, and branch circuit was not marked to indicate its purpose.  This condition exposed the employees to electrical hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2940
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.305 B01 II

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 20 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii): Unused openings in boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed:    At the facility; on or about June 8, 2012, unused openings in electrical boxes, cabinets, and fittings were not effectively closed. This condition exposed the employees to electrical hazards.   	  a) Northside Wall at the Center of Shop; an unused opening in a breaker cabinet was not closed.     b) Northside Wall at the Center of Shop; an unused opening on a switch cabinet was not effectively closed.     c) Northside of Bay 5; an unused opening on a switch cabinet was not effectively closed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.141 A03 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $700.00 · Current $350.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.141(a)(3)(i): Places of employment were not kept clean to the extent that the nature of the work allowed:    Eastside of the shop; on or about June 8, 2012, restrooms were not kept clean to the extent that the work allowed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $350
  • — Z (O) $700

1910.180 H04 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $700.00 · Current $358.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.180(h)(4)(i): The employer did not ensure that the operator kept his position at the controls while the load was suspended:    On or about August 8, 2012, Southside of Bay 5; the operator of a Grove RT58 Rough Terrain Crane Model: H35D-03 S/N: H2X351N0479635 left the controls while a load was suspended.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $358
  • — Z (O) $700

View BRAZOS PIPE & STEEL FABRICATORS, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335661989.