Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FALER FEED STORE, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of FALER FEED STORE, INC. in 4360 CEDAR HILL RD, CANAL WINCHESTER, OH 43110 (NAICS 424510). OSHA activity number 336190988.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Faler Feed Store, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Faler Feed Store, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
4360 CEDAR HILL RD
City
CANAL WINCHESTER
State
OH
ZIP
43110
Mailing
P.O. BOX 277, LITHOPOLIS, OH 43136
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
424510
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

14 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 C03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 10, 2012
Abate by
Nov 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,700 · Current $680 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(3):     Regardless of height, open-sided floors, walkways, platforms, or runways above or adjacent to dangerous equipment, pickling or galvanizing tanks, degreasing units, and similar hazards shall be guarded with a standard railing and toe board.    a.     On the top floor of the Mill head where employees go to check the bins of corn, fall protection such as, but not limited to, guardrails were not installed to prevent employees from falling into the bin thereby exposing employees to an aspxiation hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $680
  • — Z (S) $1700

1910.23 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 10, 2012
Abate by
Nov 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.23(e)(1):     A standard railing shall consist of top rail, intermediate rail, and posts, and shall have a vertical height of 42 inches nominal from upper surface of top rail to floor, platform, runway, or ramp level. The top rail shall be smooth-surfaced throughout the length of the railing. The intermediate rail shall be approximately halfway between the top rail and the floor, platform, runway, or ramp. The ends of the rails shall not overhang the terminal posts except where such overhang does not constitute a projection hazard.      a.     On the stairway from the first floor to the top floor of the mill head, the top rail was only 32 inches high and the stairway did not have a mid rail thereby exposing employees to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 A03 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Oct 10, 2012
Abate by
Dec 14, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,020 · Current $408 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(a)(3)(i):     This section requires employers to establish a program and utilize procedures for affixing appropriate lockout devices or tagout devices to energy isolating devices, and to otherwise disable machines or equipment to prevent unexpected energization, start up or release of stored energy in order to prevent injury to employees.      a.     At the grain elevator, the employer did not develop a lock-out/tag-out program for authorized or affected employees to be informed on the safe procedures for locking out equipment or working around equipment thereby exposing employees to a contact hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $408
  • — Z (S) $1020

1910.178 L01 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 10, 2012
Abate by
Nov 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,020 · Current $408 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii):     Prior to permitting an employee to operate a powered industrial truck (except for training purposes), the employer shall ensure that each operator has successfully completed the training required by this paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5).      a.     In the grain elevator where product was moved around the facility, the employer did not train employees operating powered industrial trucks in the safe operation thereby exposing employees to a struck-by hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $408
  • — Z (S) $1020

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 10, 2012
Abate by
Nov 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $544 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1):     Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are-barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices,electronic safety devices, etc.    a.     In the gray shed, the grass seed Kelly Duplex mixer auger was not provided with a guard over th auger to prevent accidental contact thereby exposing employees to a contact hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $544
  • — Z (S) $1360

1910.219 E01 I

Serious Gravity 5 5 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 10, 2012
Abate by
Nov 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $544 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(e)(1)(i):     Where both runs of horizontal belts are seven (7) feet or less from the floor level, the guard shall extend to at least fifteen (15) inches above the belt or to a standard height, except that where both runs of a horizontal belt are 42 inches or less from the floor, the belt shall be fully enclosed in accordance with paragraphs (m) and (o) of this section.      a.     In the feed room, the belt and pulley for the soybean meal auger was not fully enclosed thereby exposing employees to a caught-in hazard.    b.     In the Grinding/mixing room there was an unguarded belt and pulley which was not fully enclosed thereby exposing employees to a caught-in hazard.    c.      In the basement, the back of the guard to the Rolling Mill where the belt and pulley were located was not guarded thereby exposing employees to a caught in hazard.    d.      In the basement, the belt and pulley to the molasses pump was not guarded with a full enclosure thereby exposing employees to a caught-in hazard.    e.       In the basement, the belt and pulley on the top of the leg to the cracker was not guarded with an enclosure thereby exposing employees to a contact hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $544
  • — Z (S) $1360

1910.242 B

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 10, 2012
Abate by
Nov 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,020 · Current $408 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.242(b):     Compressed air used for cleaning. Compressed air shall not be used for cleaning purposes except where reduced to less than 30 p.s.i. and then only with effective chip guarding and personal protective equipment.          a.     In the scale area where employees used compressed air to clean and blow combustible dust from their equipment and body, the air pressure was measured at 70 psi thereby exposing employees to a contact hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $408
  • — Z (S) $1020

1910.272 D

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 10, 2012
Abate by
Nov 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,700 · Current $680 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.272(d):     Emergency action plan. The employer shall develop and implement an emergency action plan meeting the requirements contained in 29 CFR 1910.38.    a.    In the facility where grain operations were performed, the employer did not implement and develop an emergency action program to inform employees of procedures to follow in the event of an emergency such as, but not limited to a fire or explosion hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $680
  • — Z (S) $1700

1910.272 E01 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 10, 2012
Abate by
Nov 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.272(e)(1):     The employer shall provide training to employees at least annually and when changes in job assignment will expose them to new hazards. Current employees, and new employees prior to starting work, shall be trained in at least the following:    29 CFR 1910.272(e)(1)(ii):     Specific procedures and safety practices applicable to their job tasks including but not limited to, cleaning procedures for grinding equipment, clearing procedures for choked legs, housekeeping procedures, hot work procedures, preventive maintenance procedures and lock-out/tag-out procedures.      a.     On the site where grain operations were performed, the employer did not provide training in procedures for regular housekeeping, prevenitive maintenance and lock out/tag out procedures thereby exposing employees to a contact hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.272 G01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 10, 2012
Abate by
Nov 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,700 · Current $680 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.272(g)(1)(ii):     All mechanical, electrical, hydraulic, and pneumatic equipment which presents a danger to employees inside grain storage structures shall be deenergized and shall be disconnected, locked-out and tagged, blocked-off, or otherwise prevented from operating by other equally effective means or methods.      a.     On the site when employees entered the bin to perform cleaning operations, the employer did not ensure the augers and other equipment was locked out prior to the employees entering the bin thereby exposing employees to a caught-in hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $680
  • — Z (S) $1700

1910.272 J01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Oct 10, 2012
Abate by
Nov 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,020 · Current $408 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.272(j)(1):     The employer shall develop and implement a written housekeeping program that establishes the frequency and method(s) determined best to reduce accumulations of fugitive grain dust on ledges, floors, equipment, and other exposed surfaces.      a.     At the workplace, the employer did not develop and implement a written housekeeping program that established the frrequency and method(s) determined best to reduce accumulations of fugitive grain dust on ledges, floors, equipment, and other exposed surfaces in areas including, but not limited to, the following: mill, basement and bagging area.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $408
  • — Z (S) $1020

1910.145 C02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 10, 2012
Abate by
Nov 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.145(c)(2)(i):     Caution signs shall be used only to warn against potential hazards or to caution against unsafe practices.    a.     At the entrance to the mill house, the employer did not have a combustible dust hazard sign where explosive grain dust atmospheres may occur due to the handling and storing of grain.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.272 M03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 10, 2012
Abate by
Nov 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.272(m)(3):     A certification record shall be maintained of each inspection, performed in accordance with this paragraph (m), containing the date of the inspection, the name of the person who performed the inspection and the serial number, or other identifier, of the equipment specified in paragraph (m)(1)(i) of this section that was inspected.      a.     At the facility, the employer did not maintain certification records for inspections performed on equipment including, but not limited to, the following : bucket elevator, Feed room auger, Rolling mill, and other equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 10, 2012
Abate by
Nov 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):     Employers shall develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, material safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met, and which also includes the following:      a.     At the facility, the employer did not develop a hazard communication program to inform employees of the procedures for handling, dispensing, using  chemicals such as, but not limited to propane, and other chemicals used with the grain thereby exposing employees to a contact hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Faler Feed Store, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 336190988.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.