Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MANGO CONSTRUCTION, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MANGO CONSTRUCTION, INC. in 214 N. WILLIAM ST., MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 60056 (NAICS 237110). OSHA activity number 338117211.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Mango Construction, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Mango Construction, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
214 N. WILLIAM ST.
City
MOUNT PROSPECT
State
IL
ZIP
60056
Mailing
5827 S. MASSASOIT AVE., CHICAGO, IL 60638
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
237110
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 22, 2013
Abate by
Jan 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,760 · Current $880 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where (a) portable ladder(s) was/were used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladders length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and/or a grasping device was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder:    a) Employees were provided with a portable ladder that was not long enough to extend at least 3 feet above the landing surface for which it was being used to access and egress.    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $880
  • — Z (S) $1760

1926.21 B02

Repeat Gravity 5 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 22, 2013
Abate by
Mar 15, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,400 · Current $2,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury:    a) The employer did not instruct or provide instruction to employees in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to their work environment to control or minimize the hazards associated with their work.    Mango Construction, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2) which was contained in OSHA inspection number 558718, citation number 1, item number 1a, and was affirmed as a final order on October 3, 2012, with respect to a worksite located at 887 Spruce, Winnetka, Illinois.    Mango Construction, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2) which was contained in OSHA inspection number 494678, citation number 1, item number 1b, and was affirmed as a final order on August 31, 2012, with respect to a worksite located at 138 Callan, Evanston, Illinois.    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $2200
  • — Z (R) $4400

1926.651 K01

Repeat Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 22, 2013
Abate by
Mar 15, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,400 · Current $2,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.651(k)(1): Daily inspections of excavations, the adjacent areas, and protective systems were not made by a competent person for evidence of a situation that could have resulted in possible cave-ins, indications of failure of protective systems:    a) The employer did not provide a competent person to conduct required inspections where employees were exposed to the hazards associated with trenching and excavation work.    Mango Construction, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.651(k)(1) which was contained in OSHA inspection number 558718, citation number 1, item number 1b, and was affirmed as a final order on October 3, 2012, with respect to a worksite located at 887 Spruce, Winnetka, Illinois.    Mango Construction, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.651(k)(1) which was contained in OSHA inspection number 494678, citation number 1, item number 1c, and was affirmed as a final order on August 31, 2012, with respect to a worksite located at 138 Callan, Evanston, Illinois.    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $2200
  • — Z (R) $4400

1926.652 A01

Repeat Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 22, 2013
Abate by
Jan 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,400 · Current $2,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.652(a)(1): Each employee in an excavation was not protected from cave-ins by an adequate protective system designed in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.652(c):    a) Employees were not protected from the hazard of cave-ins by adequate shoring, sloping, or other protective means while working in a trench having a depth of approximately 6 feet.    Mango Construction, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2) which was contained in OSHA inspection number 558718, citation number 1, item number 2, and was affirmed as a final order on October 3, 2012, with respect to a worksite located at 887 Spruce, Winnetka, Illinois.    Mango Construction, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2) which was contained in OSHA inspection number 494678, citation number 1, item number 3, and was affirmed as a final order on August 31, 2012, with respect to a worksite located at 138 Callan, Evanston, Illinois.    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $2200
  • — Z (R) $4400

View Mango Construction, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338117211.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.