Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: TECNOFIL CHENANGO SAC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of TECNOFIL CHENANGO SAC in 40 SOUTH MAIN STREET, SHERBURNE, NY 13460 (NAICS 331421). OSHA activity number 338798838.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Tecnofil Chenango SAC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Tecnofil Chenango SAC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
40 SOUTH MAIN STREET
City
SHERBURNE
State
NY
ZIP
13460
Mailing
40 SOUTH MAIN STREET, SHERBURNE, NY 13460
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
331421
Employees
18
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 24, 2013
Abate by
Oct 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  a) At the facility, on or about 9/23/2013:  The employer did not provide abatement certification for Citation 1, Items 2a, 2b and 2c issued on June 24, 2013.  An abatement demand letter was sent to the employer on August 30, 2013.  Abatement documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (3)
  • — C (O) $400
  • — J (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $400

1910.37 A02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 24, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.37(a)(2): Exit routes were not arranged so that employees would not have to travel toward a high hazard area, nor was the hazard effectively shielded by suitable partitions or barriers:    a) Next to shipping office, on or about 2/11/13: Compressed gas cylinders of flammable acetylene were stored in a location where employees exit the building.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1120
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.102 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 24, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.102(a): The employer did not ensure that the in-plant transfer, handling, storage, and use of acetylene in cylinders comply with the provisions of CGA Pamphlet G-1-2009 ("Acetylene") (Compressed Gas Association, Inc., 12th ed., 2009).   a) Next to shipping office, on or about 2/11/13: Compressed gas cylinders of flammable acetylene were stored in a location where forklifts travel through a garage door, exposing the cylinders to potential mechanical impact.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.132 D01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 24, 2013
Abate by
Jul 12, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1)(i): The employer did not select and have each affected employee use, the types of personal protective equipment that would protect the affected employee(s) from the hazards identified in the hazard assessment:        a) During change out of water coolers in the furnace area, on or about 2/2/13: The employer did not have employees use personal protective equipment, including but not limited to flame retardant gloves, and flame retardant coveralls to protect against hazards from molten copper when taking water coolers out from molten copper bath and putting new coolers in.        Abatement documentation must be submitted for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1960
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 24, 2013
Abate by
Jul 12, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:    a) During change out of water coolers in the furnace area, on or about 2/2/13: The employer did not ensure the employees used appropriate eye or face protection including face shields to protect against exposure to molten copper metal.   b) In the furnace area, on or about 2/11/13: The employer did not ensure the employees used appropriate face protection including face shields to protect against exposure to corrosive muriatic acid.    Abatement documentation must be submitted for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.335 A01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 24, 2013
Abate by
Jul 12, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(i): Employees working in areas where there were potential electrical hazards were not provided with electrical protective equipment that was appropriate for the specific parts of the body that needed to be protected and for the work being performed:   a) On or about 2/11/2013,  Throughout the Facility:  Maintenance workers performing electrical trouble shooting work on machines and equipment along with racking high voltage breakers were not provided with or wearing flame resistant pants and shirts, voltage rated gloves, arc rated face shield and in the ear canal hearing protection.       Abatement documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 24, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where the eyes or body of any person may be exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body shall be provided within the work area for immediate emergency use.        a) In the furnace area, on or about 2/11/13: An eye wash station was not located in the work area where employees cleaned off flow meters using corrosive muriatic acid.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1120
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.1200 G08

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 24, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain copies of the required material safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical in the workplace:        a) At the facility, on or about 2/11/13: MSDS sheets were not maintained for products including liquid nitrogen, and compressed gas cylinders of flammable acetylene.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1120
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 24, 2013
Abate by
Jul 27, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:   a) At the facility, on or about 2/11/13: Employees were not provided information and training on hazardous substances in their work area including molten copper used in the furnace and liquid nitrogen for annealing.    Abatement certification must be submitted for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.146 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 24, 2013
Abate by
Jul 27, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(1): The employer did not evaluate the workplace to determine if any spaces were permit-required confined spaces:    a) At the facility, on or about 2/11/13: The workplace was not evaluated to determine if any confined spaces were permit required.     Abatement certification must be submitted for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Tecnofil Chenango SAC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338798838.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.