Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: INDUSTRIAL REFRACTORY CONSULTANTS, INC.

Unprogrammed Related inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related health inspection of INDUSTRIAL REFRACTORY CONSULTANTS, INC. in 1300 4-H PARK RD., PONTIAC, IL 61764 (NAICS 811310). OSHA activity number 338805039.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Industrial Refractory Consultants, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Industrial Refractory Consultants, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1300 4-H PARK RD.
City
PONTIAC
State
IL
ZIP
61764
Mailing
8191 PORTSMOUTH LANE, GRAND BLANC, MI 48439
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Related (G)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811310
Employees
9
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2013
Abate by
Jul 15, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  Employees were required to wear North 76008A full face respirators to protect against silica while tearing out refractory material in machine # 29M447.  The employer did not maintain a written respiratory protection program.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2013
Abate by
Jul 15, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  Employees were required to wear North 76008A full face respirators to protect against silica while tearing out refractory material in Machine #29M447.  The employer did not provide employees with medical evaluations before requiring employees to wear the respirators.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2013
Abate by
Jul 15, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  Employees were required to wear North 76008A full face respirators to protect against silica while tearing out refractory material in Machine #29M447.  The employer did not fit test employees with their respirators prior to initial use of the respirators.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2013
Abate by
Jul 15, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:  Employees were found working within the heat treat machine # 29M447 which has electrical, hydraulic, atmospheric, heat, and gravitational hazards in relation to electrical control systems, hydraulic rams, heat treat gases, combustion sources, and heat treat doors.  The employer did not establish an energy control program to protect employees against any potential hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2013
Abate by
Jul 15, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section  Employees were found working within the heat treat machine # 29M447 which has electrical, hydraulic, atmospheric, heat, and gravitational hazards in relation to electrical control systems, hydraulic rams, heat treat gases, combustion sources, and heat treat doors.  The employer had not developed, documented and utilized any procedures to control these potentially hazardous energies.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C07 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2013
Abate by
Jul 15, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide adequate training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program was understood by employees:  Employees were found working within the heat treat machine # 29M447 which has electrical, hydraulic, atmospheric, heat, and gravitational hazards in relation to electrical control systems, hydraulic rams, heat treat gases, combustion sources, and heat treat doors.  The employer did not provide employees with adequate training to ensure that the employees understood the purpose and function of the energy control program.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 F02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2013
Abate by
Jul 15, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1910.147(f)(2)(i): When outside servicing personnel were engaged in activities in a facility, the onsite employer and the outside employer did not inform each other of their respective lockout or tagout procedures:  Employees were found working within the heat treat machine # 29M447 which has electrical, hydraulic, atmospheric, heat, and gravitational hazards in relation to electrical control systems, hydraulic rams, heat treat gases, combustion sources, and heat treat doors.  Industrial Refractory Consultants, Inc. had not informed Caterpillar, Inc. and Kroeschell Operations, Inc. of their respective lockout procedures.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.147 F03 II D

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2013
Abate by
Jul 15, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(f)(3)(ii)(D): Each authorized employee did not affix a personal lockout or tagout device to the group lockout device before working on the machine or equipment:  Employees were found working within the heat treat machine # 29M447 which has electrical, hydraulic, atmospheric, heat, and gravitational hazards in relation to electrical control systems, hydraulic rams, heat treat gases, combustion sources, and heat treat doors.  None of the employees had attached any personal lockout devices to control these engergies prior to conducting furnace relining operations.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2013
Abate by
Jul 15, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):  Employees were required to tear out refractory material containing hazardous crystalline silica in Machine # 29M447.  The employer had not developed and implemented a written hazard communication program.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2013
Abate by
Jul 15, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  Employees were required to tear out refractory material containing hazardous crystalline silica in Machine # 29M447.  The employer did not provide each employee with effective information and training on the hazards of silica.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

View Industrial Refractory Consultants, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338805039.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.