EAST PEORIA, IL —
OSHA Inspection: HAGEL METAL FABRICATION, INC.
Federal Agency inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a federal Agency safety inspection of HAGEL METAL FABRICATION, INC. in 2001 EAST WASHINGTON STREET, EAST PEORIA, IL 61611 (NAICS 332312). OSHA activity number 338915804.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- HAGEL METAL FABRICATION, INC.
- Site address
- 2001 EAST WASHINGTON STREET
- City
- EAST PEORIA
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 61611
- Mailing
- 2001 EAST WASHINGTON STREET, EAST PEORIA, IL 61611
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Federal Agency (M)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332312
- Employees
- 83
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.23 A01
- Issued
- Aug 21, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(a)(1): Every stairway floor opening was not guarded by a standard railing constructed in accordance with paragraph (e) of this section: Employees were exposed to fall hazards because the north side of the stairway floor opening on the mezzanine was not guarded by a standard railing or its equivalent. The open sided floor was approximately 8.8 feet from the floor to the concrete surface below.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1000
- — C (S) $5000
- — Z (S) $5000
1910.23 C01
- Issued
- Aug 21, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Open sided floor(s) or platform(s) 4 feet or more above the adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded by standard railings or the equivalent as specific in 29 CFR 1910.23(e)(3)(i) through (v)), on all open sides: Employees were exposed to fall hazards because the west side of the mezzanine was not guarded by a standard railing or its equivalent. The open sided floor was approximately 8.8 feet from the floor to the concrete surface below.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1000
- — C (S) $5000
- — Z (S) $5000
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Aug 21, 2013
- Abate by
- Oct 8, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $70,000 · Current $35,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section: The employer has not developed, documented, nor enforced a hazardous energy control procedure for servicing the Bystronic laser cutting machines. The machine safeguards are by-passed or otherwise inoperative, and the machine's hazardous energy is not isolated and rendered safe, employees are exposed to the hazard of being struck-by and/or caught-in the machine's moving parts tables. To abate this violation the employer must take steps to ensure that lockout/tagout procedures are developed, documented, utilized and enforced for the control of hazardous energy while employees are in the area. Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, the employer must submit documentation describing the steps it is taking to ensure compliance, including the development, documentation and utilization for the control of potentially hazardous energy.
Recent events (3)
- — F (W) $35000
- — C (W) $70000
- — Z (W) $70000
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Aug 21, 2013
- Abate by
- Oct 8, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $70,000 · Current $50,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: On or about February 22, 2013, employees working in and around the "transport area" of the Bystronic laser cutting machine number 1121 are exposed to struck-by and caught-in hazards due to the following: a. the East side of the "transport area" is not guarded with a barrier guard; and, b. the presence sensing device (light curtains) on the West, North and South sides of the "transport area" does not provide adequate protection. To abate this violation, the employer must ensure that properly applied guarding and/or safeguarding devices are provided to protect employees who enter or work within the "transport area". Such guarding and/or safeguarding devices must be operational during all modes of operation. Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, the employer must submit documents describing the steps it is taking to ensure compliance, including the installation of machine guarding.
Recent events (3)
- — F (W) $50000
- — C (W) $70000
- — Z (W) $70000
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Aug 21, 2013
- Abate by
- Oct 8, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $70,000 · Current $70,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: On or about February 22, 2013, employees working in and around the "transport area" of the Bystronic laser cutting machine number 1122 are exposed to struck-by and caught-in hazards and the employer has failed to ensure that machine guarding is provided. To abate this violation, the employer must ensure that properly applied guarding and/or safeguarding devices are provided to protect employees who enter or work within the "transport area". Such guarding and/or safeguarding devices must be operational during all modes of operation. Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, the employer must submit documents describing the steps it is taking to ensure compliance, including the installation of machine guarding.
Recent events (3)
- — F (W) $70000
- — C (W) $70000
- — Z (W) $70000
More inspections at Hagel Metal Fabrication, INC.
View Hagel Metal Fabrication, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332312)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338915804.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.