WATERBURY, CT —
OSHA Inspection: DAYTON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of DAYTON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. in CHASE AVE., WATERBURY, CT 06704 (NAICS 237310). OSHA activity number 338916216.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DAYTON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
- Site address
- CHASE AVE.
- City
- WATERBURY
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06704
- Mailing
- 146 BUNKER HILL RD., WATERTOWN, CT 06795
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 237310
- Employees
- 22
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 B01
- Issued
- Mar 25, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,750 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii). Worksite: The form bracket scaffold platform that employees were working from at approximately 12 feet above the ground was not fully planked.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1750
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.451 F07
- Issued
- Mar 25, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 18, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person. Worksite: The form bracket scaffold that the employees were working from at approximately 12 feet above the ground was not erected under the supervision of a person competent in scaffold erection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $1400
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.454 A01
- Issued
- Mar 25, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 18, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a)(1): The employer failed to have each employee who performs work while on a scaffold trained regarding the nature of any electrical hazards, fall hazards and falling object hazards in the work area. Worksite: The employees who were working from the form bracket scaffold without fall protection at a height of approximately 12 feet above the ground were not trained to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 G01 VII
- Issued
- Mar 25, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,750 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section. Worksite: The employees who were working from the form bracket scaffold platform at approximately 12 feet above the ground were not protected from fall hazards by the use of a complete guardrail system or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1750
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.701 B
- Issued
- Mar 25, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.701(b): All protruding reinforcing steel, onto and/or into which employees could fall or come against, was not guarded to eliminate the hazard of impalement. Worksite: The reinforcing steel bars that were protruding from the concrete below where employees could fall were not guarded to prevent the hazard of impalement.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $1000
- — Z (S) $2000
More inspections at Dayton Construction Company, INC.
View Dayton Construction Company, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 237310)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338916216.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.