Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: PACIFIC BAY HOTEL

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of PACIFIC BAY HOTEL in 1000 SAN VITORES, TAMUNING, GU 96913 (NAICS 721110). OSHA activity number 338989072.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Pacific BAY Hotel — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Pacific BAY Hotel is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
PACIFIC BAY HOTEL
Site address
1000 SAN VITORES
City
TAMUNING
State
GU
ZIP
96913
Mailing
1000 SAN VITORES, TAMUNING, GU 96913
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
721110
Employees
29
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.36 D01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
May 21, 2013
Abate by
May 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.36(d)(1): Employee(s) were not able to open an exit route door from the inside at all times without keys, tools, or special knowledge:    a)      Hotel, 32 Wing on 2nd floor, west exit door:  On or about April 3, 2013, the single exit door was locked with a dead bolt requiring a special knowledge to locate the bolt and slide it out or pull it in the proper direction to open the door.        b)      Hotel, 42 Wing on 3nd floor, west exit door:  On or about April 3, 2013, the single exit door was locked with a dead bolt requiring a special knowledge to locate the bolt and slide it out or pull it in the proper direction to open the door.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2100
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.157 C01

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
May 21, 2013
Abate by
Jun 10, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,575 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1): Portable fire extinguishers were not mounted, located and identified so that they were readily accessible without subjecting the employees to injuries:     Hotel 31 Wing, Linen Room:  On April 3, 2013; where a fire extinguisher was not mounted and left on the floor by the door, subjecting the fire extinguisher to foot traffic and creating a tripping hazard..
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1575
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.157 E02

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
May 21, 2013
Abate by
May 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(2): Portable fire extinguishers were not visually inspected at least monthly:(a)    Hotel 31 Wing, Linen Room:  On April 3, a fire extinguisher was not inspected on a monthly basis. There was no tag showing a monthly or visual checked. None of the fire extinguishers in the hotel received a monthly inspection checked. A fire extinguisher found in the main lobby, the gauge was off the green mark and needed recharging.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.157 E03

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
May 21, 2013
Abate by
May 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(3): The employer did not assure that portable fire extinguishers are subjected to an annual maintenance check. Stored pressure extinguishers do not require an internal examination. The employer did not record the annual maintenance date and retain this record for one year after the last entry or the life of the shell, whichever is less.     a)         Hotel 31 Wing, Linen Room:  On or about April 3, a fire extinguisher was not inspected annually. None of the fire extinguishers in the hotel received an annual inspection. Another fire extinguisher found in the main lobby, the gauge was off the green mark and needs recharging.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.157 G02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 21, 2013
Abate by
May 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(2): The employer failed to provide an educational program to familiarize employees with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting to all employees upon initial employment, and at least annually thereafter:   This violation occurred on April 3, 2013 throughout the hotel where the employess expected to use fire extinguishers were not trained in the general principles and operation of fire extinguishers and the identification of various types of fires.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.303 G01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
May 21, 2013
Abate by
May 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1): Sufficient access and working space was not provided and maintained about all electric equipment (operating at 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground) to permit ready and safe operation and maintenance of such equipment:      a. 31Wing, Linen Room.This violation occurred on April 3, 2013 when piles of plastic bags were blocking the main electrical control panels. A sign on the wall left of the panel said, Keep this area clean.    b. High Voltage Room, 33Wing. This violation occurrwd on April 3, 2013 when carpet stored on floor were blocking access to electrical control circuit panel.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2100
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.305 G01 IV A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 21, 2013
Abate by
Jun 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,575 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A): Flexible cords and/or cables were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure:    Hotel roof top:  This violation was observed on April 3, 2013 when a flexible (black) extension cord was laying on the roof top and run the length of the flat roof providing power to an outdoor emergency light. The black extension cord was exposed to the weather element and used as substitute for fixed wiring.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1575
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 21, 2013
Abate by
Jun 17, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,575 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):      This violation occurred on April 3, 2013 at a jobsite where workers used hazardous materials such as, but not limited to housekeeping chemicals, lubricating spray as 2-4D, Crew, a shower tile cleaner & corrosive and clean metal Primer-Rust Oleum among others without a Written Hazard Communication Program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1575
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.1200 G01

Serious Gravity 1 5 instances 1 exposed
Issued
May 21, 2013
Abate by
Jun 17, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical in used in the workplace:     Housekeeping and Maintenance - This violation occurred on or about April 3, 2013 when the employer failed to obtain a safety data sheet for each hazardos chemical used in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 21, 2013
Abate by
Jun 17, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  Housekeeping and Maintenance - This violation occurred on or about April 3, 2013 when the employer failed to provide effective information and training on hazardous chemicals used in their work area where safety data sheets were not obtained.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Pacific BAY Hotel's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338989072.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.