Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: UNIFOIL CORPORATION

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of UNIFOIL CORPORATION in 12 DANIEL ROAD, EAST, FAIRFIELD, NJ 07004 (NAICS 322222). OSHA activity number 339003667.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Unifoil Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Unifoil Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
UNIFOIL CORPORATION
Site address
12 DANIEL ROAD, EAST
City
FAIRFIELD
State
NJ
ZIP
07004
Mailing
12 DANIEL ROAD, EAST, FAIRFIELD, NJ 07004
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
322222
Employees
34
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 12, 2013
Abate by
Aug 29, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,850 · Current $2,310 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy, including, but not limited to Items of this section:    12 Daniel Road East, Fairfield, NJ throughout facility    The employers energy control procedures did not provide sufficient detail and specificity for maintenance employees to safely and effectively control energy sources during the servicing and maintenance of equipment, such as but not limited to; the Arrow slitter machine.     Violation disclosed on or about 04/12/2013
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2310
  • — Z (S) $3850

1910.147 C05 II D

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 12, 2013
Abate by
Aug 29, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,310 · Current $1,386 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(5)(ii)(D): Lockout devices and tagout devices did not indicate the identity of the employee applying the device(s):   12 Daniel Road East, Fairfield, NJ throughout facility    Lockout devices distributed by the employer did not clearly identify the employee applying the device during the servicing, maintaining and repairing of equipment such as but not limited to; the Arrow slitter machine.    Violation observed on or about 04/12/2013
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1386
  • — Z (S) $2310

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 12, 2013
Abate by
Aug 29, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,080 · Current $1,848 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed:    12 Daniel Road East, Fairfield, NJ throughout facility    The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the company energy control procedures on an annual basis to ensure compliance with the requirements of the standard.    Violation disclosed on or about 04/12/2013
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1848
  • — Z (S) $3080

1910.147 C07 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 12, 2013
Abate by
Aug 29, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,080 · Current $1,848 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide adequate training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program was understood by employees:   12 Daniel Road East, Fairfield, NJ throughout facility    The employer did not train maintenance employees who service machinery, such as but not limited to the Arrow slitter machine, in the methods and means necessary for energy isolation and control.    Violation disclosed on or about 04/12/2013
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1848
  • — Z (S) $3080

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 12, 2013
Abate by
Aug 29, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,620 · Current $2,772 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):  12 Daniels Road East, Fairfield, NJ throughout the facility    The employer did not provide training or evaluate employees to ensure they were competent to operate a powered industrial truck in a safe manner.    Violation disclosed on or about 04/12/2013
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2772
  • — Z (S) $4620

1910.178 L04 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 12, 2013
Abate by
Aug 29, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years:  12 Daniels Road East, Fairfield, NJ throughout the facility    The employer did not powered industrial truck operators who received training with an evaluation at least once every three years. Records indicate operators were last trained on 2010.     Violation disclosed on or about 04/12/2013
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A03 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 12, 2013
Abate by
Aug 29, 2013
Penalty
Initial $5,390 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):  12 Daniel Road East, Fairfield, NJ throughout facility    Employees operate Arrow slitter # 4 without the point of operation being guarded.      Violation observed on or about 04/12/2013
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $5390

1910.1200 F05

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 12, 2013
Abate by
Aug 29, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,310 · Current $1,386 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged, or marked with the identity and appropriate hazard warnings regarding the chemicals contained therein:   12 Daniel Road East, Fairfield, NJ west side of facility    Container where excess adhesive material is collected from a machine was not labeled of marked.     Violation observed on or about 04/12/2013
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1386
  • — Z (S) $2310

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 12, 2013
Abate by
Aug 29, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,310 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:    12 Daniel Road East, Fairfield, NJ throughout the facility       Employer did not provide employees who handle hazardous materials such as but not limited to propane tanks, with training to recognize the hazards of dealing with such material.        Violation observed on or about 04/12/2013
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2310

View Unifoil Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339003667.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.