RAMSEY, NJ —
OSHA Inspection: LEEM/LSS FILTRATION
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of LEEM/LSS FILTRATION in 25 ARROW ROAD, RAMSEY, NJ 07446 (NAICS 333318). OSHA activity number 339027831.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LEEM/LSS FILTRATION
- Site address
- 25 ARROW ROAD
- City
- RAMSEY
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 07446
- Mailing
- 25 ARROW ROAD, RAMSEY, NJ 07446
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 333318
- Employees
- 38
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Sep 16, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to a struck by hazard. a. Shipping Area: A periodic inspection was not conducted on a Coffing 2 ton hoist, on or about 7/11/2013. b. Welding Area: A periodic inspection was not conducted on a HHXG-K 2 ton hoist, on or about 7/11/2013.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2100
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.110 E04 III
- Issued
- Sep 16, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.110(e)(4)(iii): Permanent and removable fuel containers were not securely mounted to prevent jarring loose, slipping, or rotating: a. Throughout Facility: The index pin was missing on the Toyota powered industrial truck; thus allowing the cylinder to rotate during operation, on or about 7/11/2013.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.147 C04 II
- Issued
- Sep 16, 2013
- Abate by
- Dec 1, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii): Procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy, and the means to enforce compliance including, but not limited to, 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(A), (c)(4)(ii)(B), (c)(4)(ii)(C) and (c)(4)(ii)(D): a. Machine Shop Area: The employer did not have specific procedural steps for controlling hazardous energy while performing servicing and maintenance on equipment, such as but not limited to Tos Trencin lathe, Bridgeport milling machine, wedge wire machines, electric chain hoists, Sturdybender and Chicago power press brakes, on or about 4/26/2013.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2100
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.147 C06 I
- Issued
- Sep 16, 2013
- Abate by
- Dec 1, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed: a. Machine Shop Area: The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the company energy control procedures, on or about 4/26/2013.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Sep 16, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l): a. Facility: The employer did not provide training for an employee operating Nissan and Toyota powered industrial trucks, on or about 4/26/2013.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2100
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Sep 16, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $2,940 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points and rotating parts: a. Machine Shop: An employee was exposed to rotating parts from the unguarded rotating spindle on a Tos Trencin lathe. An employee was caught in the unguarded machine and suffered serious injuries as a result, on or about 4/26/2013.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2940
- — Z (S) $4900
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Sep 16, 2013
- Abate by
- Dec 1, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s): a. Machine Shop: Employees were exposed to an amputation hazard from the unguarded drill bit on the Walker Turner and Bridgeport drill press, on or about 4/26/2013. b. Machine Shop: A Sturdybender and Chicago power press brakes were not equipped with a guard, on or about 7/11/2013.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2100
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.212 B
- Issued
- Sep 16, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(b): Machine(s) designed for fixed location(s) were not securely anchored to prevent walking or moving: a. Machine Shop: A Walker Turner drill press was not anchored to prevent moving, on or about 4/26/2013.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.219 E03 I
- Issued
- Sep 16, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(e)(3)(i): Vertical or inclined belt(s) were not enclosed by guard(s) conforming to the requirements specified at 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o) a. Wedge Wire Area: The vertical belt on the small wedge wire machine was not guarded, on or about 4/26/2013.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2100
- — Z (S) $3500
More inspections at Leem/Lss Filtration
View Leem/Lss Filtration's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 333318)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339027831.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.