Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,991Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-24 Last loaded 2026-08-27

OSHA Inspection: U. S. BORDER PATROL-YUMA SECTOR

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of U. S. BORDER PATROL-YUMA SECTOR in 4035 S AVENUE A, YUMA, AZ 85365 (NAICS 922120). OSHA activity number 339028235.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch U. S. Border Patrol-Yuma Sector for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for U. S. Border Patrol-Yuma Sector is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
4035 S AVENUE A
City
YUMA
State
AZ
ZIP
85365
Mailing
4035 S AVENUE A, YUMA, AZ 85365
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Union (A)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
922120
Employees
1200
Ownership type
Federal government (D)

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.165 D04

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1200 exposed
Issued
Aug 30, 2013
Abate by
Sep 26, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.165(d)(4): All supervised employee alarm systems were not tested at least annually for reliability and adequacy:  (a) 4035 S Avenue A, Yuma, AZ 85365:  On or about 30 April 2013, and at times prior thereto, the SIMPLEX 4620 automatic supervised alarm system was not tested for reliability and adequacy since the last test conducted in June 2011, exposing the employees to hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1904.7 B03

Other-than-serious 8 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 30, 2013
Abate by
Sep 26, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1904.7(b)(3): The employer incorrectly recorded the following work-related injuries or illnesses on the OSHA Form 300 or equivalent:  (a) 4035 S Avenue A, Yuma, AZ 85365:  On or about 30 April 2013, and at times prior thereto, the employer incorrectly recorded work-related injuries or illness on the OSHA Form 300 for Calendar Year 2012, in the following instances:   Instance # 1: Case number 2012-03705, on 02/22/2012, while a maintenance mechanic was  painting the lower portion of a trailer ramp in the welding shop, he felt his left knee give way with a popping sound, which resulted in  a restricted duty case. This case was incorrectly recorded both as an injury in column M1 and as an illness in column M6 , as was double counted in the total columns.    Instance #2: Case number 2012-06658, a Patrol Agent, on 06/13/2012, while participating in an Baton Instructor Certification Course, attempted to block a baton strike and experienced a pop in his left shoulder, resulting in limited mobility and restricted duty.  This was recorded as both an injury and illness in columns M1 and M6, and was counted twice in the total columns.    Instance#3: Case number 2012-07186, on 07/03/2012, the same employee identified in Instance #1, while still on restricted duty, was installing duct work atop the roof of Yuma Station, when he felt pain in the same left knee reportedly injured in Instance # 1, as he worked while kneeling, resulting in medical care.  This was recorded as both an injury and illness in columns M1 and M6, and totaled twice.    Instance#4:  Case number 2012-07421, a Patrol Agent, on 07/09/2012, while assigned as a Firearms Instructor at the Adair Firing Range, was following an agent during an ambush scenario when he tripped and fell, injuring his (unspecified) knee, resulting in restricted duty. This was recorded as both an injury and illness, and counted twice in the total columns.    Instance#5: Case number 2012-08610, a Patrol Agent, on 08/09/2012, while on a ruck march (loaded carry) along the East Main Canal, experienced pain in his left hip, which resulted in medical care. This was recorded as both an injury and illness, and counted twice in the total columns.    Instance#6: Case number 2013-00523, a Patrol Agent, on 10/02/2012, while exercising in the gym during temporary duty with the Special Operations Group in Texas, experienced a sharp pain in his left shoulder blade extending down into his left arm, resulting in medical treatment. This was recorded as both an injury and illness, and counted twice in the total columns.    Intance#7: Case number 2012-07433, a maintenance mechanic, on 07/06/2012, while relocating a mobile check point on the highway, was attacked and stung multiple times by a swarm of bees, resulting in swelling of the face, eyelids,  hands, arms, and neck  and medical treatment.  No check was made on the OSHA 300 Log to identify this event as either an injury or illness, and this case was not counted in the total column at the end of the year.    Instance#8: Case number 2013-00137, an automotive mechanic, on 09/28/2012, while filling compressed air into a tire, experienced temporary hearing loss and medical treatment when the tire exploded, but this event was neither  recorded as an acoustic trauma (injury) or  an illness (hearing loss) on the OSHA 300, and was not counted at the end of year total.  Instead the event was recorded as a skin disorder in column M2, and totaled as such and noted as a skin disorder on the OSHA 300A Annual Summary for Calendar Year 2012.     ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $0

1904.7 B03 VII

Other-than-serious 5 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 30, 2013
Abate by
Sep 26, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1904.7(b)(3)(vii): The employer did not correctly record the number of calendar days of injury or illnesses cases on the OSHA 300 Log which resulted in days away from work or days of job transfer or restriction, by capping the total number of days at 180 days for cases meeting that criteria:  (a) 4035 S Avenue A, Yuma, AZ 85365:  On or about 30 April 2013, the employer did not correctly record the number of calendar days of days away from work or job transfer or restrictions on the Calendar Year 2012 OSHA 300 Log,  in the following instances:  (1)    Case # 2012-03705    Transfer/Restriction     As entered on Log 425 days  (2)    Case # 2012-03874    Transfer/Restriction    As entered on Log 371 days (3)    Case # 2012-05161    Transfer/Restriction     As entered on Log 371 days (4)    Case # 2012-06658    Transfer/Restriction     As entered on Log 312 days (5)    Case # 2012-07421    Transfer/Restriction     As entered on Log 281 days
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $0

1904.35 B02 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 30, 2013
Abate by
Sep 26, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1904.35(b)(2)(iii): 29 CFR 1904.35(b)(iii): Employer did not provide requested OSHA 300 Logs to an authorized employee representative by the end of the next business day:  (a) 4035 S Avenue A, Yuma Sector, Yuma, AZ 85365:  On or about 12 April 2013, the Employer did not provide copies of the OSHA 300 Logs when requested by an authorized representative by the end of the next business day.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $0

1904.35 B02 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 30, 2013
Abate by
Sep 26, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1904.35(b)(2)(iv): The employer removed names from the OSHA 300 Log prior to giving copies of the Log to a representative of the employees who requested access.  (a) 4035 S Avenue A, Yuma Sector, Yuma, AZ 85365:  On or about 26 April 2013, and at times prior thereto, the employer removed names from the OSHA 300 Log prior to giving copies of the Log to a representative of the employees who requested access to the Logs.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $0

1960.67 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 30, 2013
Abate by
Sep 26, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1960.67(a): The employer did not ensure the summery of work related injuries and illness (OSHA Form 300a or equivalent) was certified by a Senior Agency Management Official:  (a) 4035 S Avenue A, Yuma, AZ 85365:  On or about 30 April 2013, and at times prior thereto, the OSHA 300A Annual Summary of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses for Calendar Years 2010, 2011, and 2012 were certified by a management official who was not the senior establishment management official, or any management official who is in the direct chain-of-command between the senior establishment management official and the Agency head.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $0

View U. S. Border Patrol-Yuma Sector's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339028235.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.