Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: TANIS, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of TANIS, INC. in 3660 KETTLE COURT EAST, DELAFIELD, WI 53018 (NAICS 339994). OSHA activity number 339037004.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Tanis, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Tanis, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
TANIS, INC.
Site address
3660 KETTLE COURT EAST
City
DELAFIELD
State
WI
ZIP
53018
Mailing
3660 KETTLE COURT EAST, DELAFIELD, WI 53018
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
339994
Employees
50
Ownership type
Private (A)

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 20, 2013
Abate by
Aug 19, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,380 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed:     (a) The employer did not review at least annually each authorized employee's application of lockout/tagout for the energy control procedures being inspected to ensure proficiency with controlling hazardous energy has been maintained. An employee was changing a drill on the EW125LS and was not controlling hazardous energy with lockout/tagout.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1400
  • · Z (S) $2380

1910.147 D03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 20, 2013
Abate by
Jul 10, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(3): All energy isolating devices that were needed to control the energy to the machine or equipment were not physically located and operated in such a manner as to isolate the machine or equipment from the energy source(s):  (a) The employer did not ensure that the Zahoransky EW125 LS brush making drill/fill/staple machine was isolated from the energy source and locked out prior to changing drill bits, exposing employees to entanglement hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 20, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,975 · Current $1,800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees from hazard(s) created by trimmer blades:    (a)  In the production area, the employer did not ensure that the unused portion of the trimmer blades was adequately guarded. Employees were exposed to laceration hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1800
  • · Z (S) $2975

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 20, 2013
Abate by
Jul 17, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,380 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):      (a)    At the Zahoransky E2305D brush making machine, the operator was not protected from the brush handle drills and the brush handle bristle stapler heads as he removed completed brushes from the machine and as he inserted brush handles into the machine while it was running.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1400
  • · Z (S) $2380

1910.219 E03 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 20, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,380 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(e)(3)(i): Vertical or inclined belt(s) were not enclosed by guard(s) conforming to the requirements specified at 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o):    (a)  In the production area, the employer did not ensure the vertical belt on the TR-18 trimmer was adequately guarded.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1400
  • · Z (S) $2380

1910.219 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 20, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.219(d)(1): Pulley(s) with part(s) seven feet or less from the floor or work platform were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o):  (a)  In the production area, the employer did not ensure the pulley on the TR-18 trimmer was adequately guarded.   (b)  In the production area, the employer did not ensure the pulley on the TR-22 trimmer was adequately guarded.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.151 C

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 20, 2013
Abate by
Jun 27, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:  (a) In the shipping/receiving area, the employer did not ensure the eye wash station was available for immediate use; specifically, it was blocked by a pallet of materials.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.178 A04

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 20, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(4): Modifications and additions which affect capacity and safe operation of powered industrial truck were performed by the employer without the manufacturer's prior written approval:  (a)  In the shipping/receiving area, the Schaeff forklift (S/N: W04549W/86650) had holes burned into the forks without the manufacturer's written approval.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View Tanis, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339037004.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.