BENNETTSVILLE, SC ·
OSHA Inspection: U.S. DEPT OF JUSTICE
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of U.S. DEPT OF JUSTICE in 696 MUCKERMAN ROAD, BENNETTSVILLE, SC 29512 (NAICS 922140). OSHA activity number 339132037.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- U.S. DEPT OF JUSTICE
- Site address
- 696 MUCKERMAN ROAD
- City
- BENNETTSVILLE
- State
- SC
- ZIP
- 29512
- Mailing
- 696 MUCKERMAN ROAD, BENNETTSVILLE, SC 29512
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Union (A)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 922140
- Employees
- 287
- Ownership type
- Federal government (D)
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Oct 18, 2013
- Abate by
- Oct 28, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where the eyes or body of any person may be exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body shall be provided within the work area for immediate emergency use. (a) An eyewash was not immediately available to HVAC employees who mixed caustic coil cleaner on a loading dock. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1200 F06 II
- Issued
- Oct 18, 2013
- Abate by
- Oct 26, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(ii): Except as provided in paragraphs (f)(7) and (f)(8) of this section, the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provided at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals, and which, in conjunction with the other information immediately available to employees under the hazard communication program, would provide employees with the specific information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemicals: (a) A plastic two-gallon garden sprayer (containing caustic coil cleaner) found in a storage cabinet in the HVAC Shop in Facilities Maintenance was not provided with an identity or hazard warning label. (b) A gallon container of Acrylic Latex High Gloss Enamel Paint found in the Paint Shop in Facilities Maintenance was not provided with an appropriate hazard warning label. (c) Two 65-gallon bulk containers of hydraulic fluid located on a dispensing rack in the Garage were not provided with hazard warning labels. (d) Five 65-gallon bulk containers of motor oil located on a dispensing rack in the Garage were not provided wtih hazard warning labels.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1030 D04 III A 1
- Issued
- Oct 18, 2013
- Abate by
- Oct 25, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(4)(iii)(A)(1): Contaminated sharps were not discarded immediately or as soon as feasible in containers that are described in sections (i) through (iv) of this section: (a) Correctional officers assigned to the Special Housing Unit are collecting used disposable razors from inmates and placing them into plastic bags for disposal into regular trash dumpster(s) at the facility. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED NOTICE CITATION #2, ITEM #1, 29 CFR 1910.1030(D)(4)(III)(A)(1) AS REQUIRED BY 29 CFR 1960.8(B): THE EMPLOYER FAILED TO ENSURE THAT USED DISPOSABLE RAZORS COLLECTED FROM SPECIAL HOUSING UNIT INMATES WERE DISCARDED INTO SHARPS CONTAINERS. THE EMPLOYER WAS CITED FOR A VIOLATION OF THE SAME STANDARD ON 5/6/2011, INSPECTION #312926017, FINAL ORDER/SETTLEMENT DATE 5/31/13, AND WAS ABATED BY TRAINING PERSONNEL AND DEVELOPING A MEMO REGARDING PROPER DISPOSAL OF USED RAZORS.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (R) $0
1910.1026 L02 I A
- Issued
- Oct 18, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 2, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1026(l)(2)(i)(A): The employer did not provide appropriate information and training for all employees exposed to chromium (VI), in that employees could not demonstrate knowledge of the contents of the Chromium (VI) standard, 29 CFR 1910.1026: (a) An employee of the Welding Shop (located in the Garage) who is exposed to chromium (VI) while welding on stainless steel equipment had not received training on the contents of 29 CFR 1910.1026. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED NOTICE CITATION #3, ITEM #1A, 29 CFR 1910.1026(L)(2)(I)(A) AS REQUIRED BY 29 CFR 1960.8(B): THE EMPLOYER FAILED TO PROVIDE EMPLOYEES WITH TRAINING ON THE CONTENTS OF 29 CFR 1910.1026. THE EMPLOYER WAS CITED FOR A VIOLATION OF THE SAME STANDARD ON 3/10/2011, INSPECTION #308329382, FINAL ORDER/SETTLEMENT DATE 4/4/2011, AND WAS ABATED BY PROVIDING EMPLOYEES WITH TRAINING.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (R) $0
1910.1026 L02 I B
- Issued
- Oct 18, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 2, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1026(l)(2)(i)(B): The employer did not provide appropriate information and training for all employees exposed to chromium (VI) in that employees could not demonstrate knowledge of the purpose and description of the requirements for a medical surveillance program as outlined by the Chromium (VI) standard, 29 CFR 1910.1026(k): (a) An employee of the Welding Shop (located in the Garage) who is exposed to chromium (VI) while welding on stainless steel equipment had not been briefed on the purpose or provided a description of the medical surveillance program requirements stipulated in paragraph (k) of this section. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED NOTICE CITATION #3, ITEM #1B, 29 CFR 1910.1026(L)(2)(I)(B) AS REQUIRED BY 29 CFR 1960.8(B): THE EMPLOYER FAILED TO PROVIDE EMPLOYEES WITH INFORMATION AND TRAINING REGARDING THE PURPOSE FOR AND A DESCRIPTION OF THE MEDICAL SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM OUTLINED BY 29 CFR 1910.1026(K). THE EMPLOYER WAS CITED FOR A VIOLATION OF THE SAME STANDARD ON 3/10/2011, INSPECTION #308329382, FINAL ORDER/SETTLEMENT DATE 4/4/2011, AND WAS ABATED BY PROVIDING EMPLOYEES WITH INFORMATION AND TRAINING.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (R) $0
1910.1200 H03 II
- Issued
- Oct 18, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 2, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(ii): Employee training did not include the physical and health hazards of the chemicals in the work area: (a) An employee of the Welding Shop (located in the Garage) who is exposed to chromium (VI) while welding on stainless steel equipment had not been trained on the physical and health hazards of this hazardous chemical. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED NOTICE CITATION #3, ITEM #1C, 29 CFR 1910.1200(H)(3)(II) AS REQUIRED BY 29 CFR 1960.8(B): THE EMPLOYER FAILED TO PROVIDE EMPLOYEES WITH TRAINING ON THE PHYSICAL AND HEALTH HAZARDS OF CHROMIUM VI. THE EMPLOYER WAS CITED FOR A VIOLATION OF THE SAME STANDARD ON 3/10/2011, INSPECTION #308329382, FINAL ORDER/SETTLEMENT DATE 4/4/2011, AND WAS ABATED BY PROVIDING EMPLOYEES WITH TRAINING.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (R) $0
1910.1026 L02 II
- Issued
- Oct 18, 2013
- Abate by
- Oct 26, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1026(l)(2)(ii): The employer did not make a copy of the Chromium (VI) standard, 29 CFR 1910.1026, readily available to all employees who were exposed to chromium (VI): (a) The employer did not make a copy of 29 CFR 1910.1026 readily available to an employee in the Welding Shop who was exposed to chromium VI while welding on stainless steel equipment. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections at U.S. Dept of Justice
View U.S. Dept of Justice's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 922140)
More inspections in SC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339132037.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.