Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,991Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-24 Last loaded 2026-08-27

OSHA Inspection: U.S. DEPT OF JUSTICE

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of U.S. DEPT OF JUSTICE in 696 MUCKERMAN ROAD, BENNETTSVILLE, SC 29512 (NAICS 922140). OSHA activity number 339132037.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch U.S. Dept of Justice for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for U.S. Dept of Justice is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
696 MUCKERMAN ROAD
City
BENNETTSVILLE
State
SC
ZIP
29512
Mailing
696 MUCKERMAN ROAD, BENNETTSVILLE, SC 29512
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Union (A)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
922140
Employees
287
Ownership type
Federal government (D)

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Oct 18, 2013
Abate by
Oct 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.151(c):   Where the eyes or body of any person may be exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body shall be provided within the work area for immediate emergency use.  (a) An eyewash was not immediately available to HVAC employees who mixed caustic coil cleaner on a loading dock.   ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 F06 II

Serious Gravity 5 9 instances 36 exposed
Issued
Oct 18, 2013
Abate by
Oct 26, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(ii):   Except as provided in paragraphs (f)(7) and (f)(8) of this section, the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provided at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals, and which, in conjunction with the other information immediately available to employees under the hazard communication program, would provide employees with the specific information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemicals:  (a) A plastic two-gallon garden sprayer (containing caustic coil cleaner) found in a storage cabinet in the HVAC Shop in Facilities Maintenance was not provided with an identity or hazard warning label.   (b) A gallon container of Acrylic Latex High Gloss Enamel Paint found in the Paint Shop in Facilities Maintenance was not provided with an appropriate hazard warning label.  (c) Two 65-gallon bulk containers of hydraulic fluid located on a dispensing rack in the Garage were not provided with hazard warning labels.  (d) Five 65-gallon bulk containers of motor oil located on a dispensing rack in the Garage were not provided wtih hazard warning labels.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1030 D04 III A 1

Repeat Gravity 5 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Oct 18, 2013
Abate by
Oct 25, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(4)(iii)(A)(1): Contaminated sharps were not discarded immediately or as soon as feasible in containers that are described in sections (i) through (iv) of this section:  (a)  Correctional officers assigned to the Special Housing Unit are collecting used disposable razors from inmates and placing them into plastic bags for disposal into regular trash dumpster(s) at the facility.  ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED  NOTICE CITATION #2, ITEM #1, 29 CFR 1910.1030(D)(4)(III)(A)(1) AS REQUIRED BY 29 CFR 1960.8(B): THE EMPLOYER FAILED TO ENSURE THAT USED DISPOSABLE RAZORS COLLECTED FROM SPECIAL HOUSING UNIT INMATES WERE DISCARDED INTO SHARPS CONTAINERS. THE EMPLOYER WAS CITED FOR A VIOLATION OF THE SAME STANDARD ON 5/6/2011, INSPECTION #312926017, FINAL ORDER/SETTLEMENT DATE 5/31/13, AND WAS ABATED BY TRAINING PERSONNEL AND DEVELOPING A MEMO REGARDING PROPER DISPOSAL OF USED RAZORS.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (R) $0

1910.1026 L02 I A

Repeat 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 18, 2013
Abate by
Nov 2, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1026(l)(2)(i)(A): The employer did not provide appropriate information and training for all employees exposed to chromium (VI), in that employees could not demonstrate knowledge of the contents of the Chromium (VI) standard, 29 CFR 1910.1026:  (a) An employee of the Welding Shop (located in the Garage) who is exposed to chromium (VI) while welding on stainless steel equipment had not received training on the contents of 29 CFR 1910.1026.   ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED  NOTICE CITATION #3, ITEM #1A, 29 CFR 1910.1026(L)(2)(I)(A) AS REQUIRED BY 29 CFR 1960.8(B): THE EMPLOYER FAILED TO PROVIDE EMPLOYEES WITH TRAINING ON THE CONTENTS OF 29 CFR 1910.1026. THE EMPLOYER WAS CITED FOR A VIOLATION OF THE SAME STANDARD ON 3/10/2011, INSPECTION #308329382,  FINAL ORDER/SETTLEMENT DATE 4/4/2011, AND WAS ABATED BY PROVIDING EMPLOYEES WITH TRAINING.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (R) $0

1910.1026 L02 I B

Repeat 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 18, 2013
Abate by
Nov 2, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1026(l)(2)(i)(B): The employer did not provide appropriate information and training for all employees exposed to chromium (VI) in that employees could not demonstrate knowledge of the purpose and description of the requirements for a medical surveillance program as outlined by the Chromium (VI) standard, 29 CFR 1910.1026(k):  (a) An employee of the Welding Shop (located in the Garage) who is exposed to chromium (VI) while welding on stainless steel equipment had not been briefed on the purpose or provided a description of the medical surveillance program requirements stipulated in paragraph (k) of this section.  ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED   NOTICE CITATION #3, ITEM #1B, 29 CFR 1910.1026(L)(2)(I)(B) AS REQUIRED BY 29 CFR 1960.8(B): THE EMPLOYER FAILED TO PROVIDE EMPLOYEES WITH INFORMATION AND TRAINING REGARDING THE PURPOSE FOR AND A DESCRIPTION OF THE MEDICAL SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM OUTLINED BY 29 CFR 1910.1026(K).  THE EMPLOYER WAS CITED FOR A VIOLATION OF THE SAME STANDARD ON 3/10/2011, INSPECTION #308329382, FINAL ORDER/SETTLEMENT DATE 4/4/2011, AND WAS ABATED BY PROVIDING EMPLOYEES WITH INFORMATION AND TRAINING.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (R) $0

1910.1200 H03 II

Repeat 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 18, 2013
Abate by
Nov 2, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(ii): Employee training did not include the physical and health hazards of the chemicals in the work area:  (a) An employee of the Welding Shop (located in the Garage) who is exposed to chromium (VI) while welding on stainless steel equipment had not been trained on the physical and health hazards of this hazardous chemical.   ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED  NOTICE CITATION #3, ITEM #1C, 29 CFR 1910.1200(H)(3)(II) AS REQUIRED BY 29 CFR 1960.8(B): THE EMPLOYER FAILED TO PROVIDE EMPLOYEES WITH TRAINING ON THE PHYSICAL AND HEALTH HAZARDS OF CHROMIUM VI. THE EMPLOYER WAS CITED FOR A VIOLATION OF THE SAME STANDARD ON 3/10/2011, INSPECTION #308329382, FINAL ORDER/SETTLEMENT DATE 4/4/2011, AND WAS ABATED BY PROVIDING EMPLOYEES WITH TRAINING.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (R) $0

1910.1026 L02 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 18, 2013
Abate by
Oct 26, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1026(l)(2)(ii): The employer did not make a copy of the Chromium (VI) standard, 29 CFR 1910.1026, readily available to all employees who were exposed to chromium (VI):  (a) The employer did not make a copy of 29 CFR 1910.1026 readily available to an employee in the Welding Shop who was exposed to chromium VI while welding on stainless steel equipment.  ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $0

View U.S. Dept of Justice's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339132037.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.