Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,201Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-31 Last loaded 2026-09-03

OSHA Inspection: CONTAINER MAINTENANCE CORPORATION

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of CONTAINER MAINTENANCE CORPORATION in NORTH CHARLESTON TERMINAL, NORTH CHARLESTON, SC 29418 (NAICS 488390). OSHA activity number 339316440.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Container Maintenance Corporation for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Container Maintenance Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
NORTH CHARLESTON TERMINAL
City
NORTH CHARLESTON
State
SC
ZIP
29418
Mailing
2265 CLEMENTS FERRY ROAD SUITE 301, CHARLESTON, SC 29492
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Union (A)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
488390
Employees
30
Ownership type
Private (A)

2 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 5, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,250 · Current $4,250
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): Section 5(A)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or were likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to crushing injuries from a Caterpillar forklift, model P6000, equipped with roll over protection (ROPS) overturning or from the operator falling out of the forklift due to the fact that the operator restraint systems (seat belt) provided on the forklift was not used by the operator. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct this hazard is for the employer to require and effectively enforce the use of the operator restraint systems Provided by the manufacturer of the forklift.   a) Worksite: Employee operating the Caterpillar forklift model P6000, was observed not wearing the seat belt provided.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $4250
  • · Z (S) $4250

1917.44 N

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 5, 2013
Abate by
Dec 5, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,250 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1917.44(n): Safety devices were removed and/or made inoperative on vehicles used to transport employees within the terminal    a) Common Use Area of the North Charleston Terminal: The seat belts for Utility Truck #87 had been removed. The male-end buckle and belt was not in the vehicle and the belt containing the female-end buckle was stuck up into the wire cage dividing the cab from the back end of the truck.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $4250

View Container Maintenance Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339316440.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.