Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SEGUNDO LOJA

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of SEGUNDO LOJA in 73 OLD ORCHARD ROAD, SHERBORN, MA 01770 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339342875.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Segundo Loja — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Segundo Loja is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
SEGUNDO LOJA
Site address
73 OLD ORCHARD ROAD
City
SHERBORN
State
MA
ZIP
01770
Mailing
45 GROVE STREET, MILFORD, MA 01757
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2014
Abate by
Jul 15, 2014
Penalty
Initial $440 · Current $440
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  (a) Location: 73 Old Orchard Road, Sherborn, MA 01770  On or about 8/22/2013, the employer failed to provide abatement certification for citation #2, item #1: Provide safety training to employees on fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $440

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 16, 2013
Abate by
Nov 1, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,080 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.     (a) Location: 73 Old Orchard Road, Sherborn MA, 01770     On or about 8/22/2013, eye and face protective equipment was not used when an employee was using a nail gun.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $3080

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 16, 2013
Abate by
Nov 1, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,080 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns     (a) Location: 73 Old Orchard Road, Sherborn MA, 01770     On or about 8/22/2013, the employer did not provide or require employees working on the ground in support of a roofing job to wear hard hats.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3080

1926.416 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 16, 2013
Abate by
Nov 1, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,080 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.416(a)(1): Employees were permitted to work in proximity to electric power circuits and were not protected against electric shock by de-energizing and grounding the circuits or effectively guarding the circuits by insulation or other means:     (a) Location: 73 Old Orchard Road, Sherborn MA, 01770     On or about 8/22/2013, employees were not protected from energized electrical circuits that were in close proximity to an aluminum extension ladder that was used to gain access to the roof they were working on.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $3080

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 16, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,080 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):     (a)  Location: 73 Old Orchard Road, Sherborn MA, 01770     On or about 8/22/2013, were not protected from falling while working on a roof greater than six feet above a lower level.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $3080

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 16, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,080 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladders length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:     (a) Location: 73 Old Orchard Road, Sherborn MA, 01770     On or about 8/22/2013, employees were not protected from falling while using a ladder that did not extend at least three feet above the upper landing surface.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3080

1926.503 A01

Repeat Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 16, 2013
Abate by
Nov 1, 2013
Penalty
Initial $6,160 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:     (a) Location: 73 Old Orchard Road, Sherborn MA, 01770     On or about 8/22/2013, the employer did not provide safety training for the employees who might be exposed to fall hazards.    The (S & L Siding) was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard (1926.503(a)(1)), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 315146001, citation number 02, item number 01 and was affirmed as a final order on (6/12/2012), with respect to a workplace located at 569-571 adams Street, Milton MA 02186.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $1000
  • — Z (R) $6160

View Segundo Loja's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339342875.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.