Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,892Inspections Most recent open 2026-09-03 Last loaded 2026-09-07

OSHA Inspection: STRONG STRUCTURAL STEEL, LTD.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of STRONG STRUCTURAL STEEL, LTD. in 605 W. EL RANCHO BLANCO ROAD, PHARR, TX 78577 (NAICS 331513). OSHA activity number 339364184.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Strong Structural Steel, LTD. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Strong Structural Steel, LTD. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
605 W. EL RANCHO BLANCO ROAD
City
PHARR
State
TX
ZIP
78577
Mailing
605 W EL RANCHO BLANCO RD, PHARR, TX 78577
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
331513
Employees
59
Ownership type
Private (A)

12 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 A02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 3, 2014
Abate by
Feb 25, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,260 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(a)(2): The employer did not establish and maintain a respiratory protection program which included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.134(c):  At this steel and metal fabrication establishment a respiratory protection program was not developed and implemented to protect workers performing welding operations.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1260
  • · Z (S) $2100

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 5 5 instances 25 exposed
Issued
Jan 3, 2014
Abate by
Feb 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use  At this steel and metal fabrication establishment, where employees performed various welding activities, the eye wash station was not located in close proximity to where welding operations were conducted and the eye wash station' s handle was missing.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1680
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.178 L

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 3, 2014
Abate by
Feb 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,260 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l): Operators were not trained in the safe operation of powered industrial trucks:  On August 28, 2013 and at other times prior thereto, at this steel and metal fabrication establishment, employees operating a Lull forklift to receive and handle material such as steel, flat bar, and flux core wire were not trained and certified as forkift operators.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1260
  • · Z (S) $2100

1910.178 P01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 3, 2014
Abate by
Feb 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been  taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition(s):  At this establishment, the employer did not ensure that the Lull forklift being operated was maintained in a safe condition. The Lull forklift had a leak in the brake line, exposing employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1680
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.243 C03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 3, 2014
Abate by
Feb 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.243(c)(3): Abrasive wheels used on vertical portable grinder(s) (right angle head grinders) were not provided with safety guard(s) having a maximum exposure angle of 180 degrees and located between the operator and wheel:  At this establishment, in the fabrication shop, a De Walt right angle grinder did not have its safety guard on the grinder while in use. An employee was using the grinder on a metal beam placed on 2 inch by 4 inch cribbing on the shop floor.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1680
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.252 B02 II G

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 3, 2014
Abate by
Feb 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,260 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.252(b)(2)(ii)(G): Lenses did not bear some permanent distinctive marking by which the source and shade could be readily identified.  At this establishment, employees performed wire feed welding. The hood lens being used by a welder did not have a permanent distinctive marking to identify what shade number was being utilized.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1260
  • · Z (S) $2100

1910.254 D09 III

Serious Gravity 1 15 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 3, 2014
Abate by
Feb 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,260 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.254(d)(9)(iii): Cables with damaged insulation or exposed bare conductors were not replaced:  Throughout this steel and metal fabrication shop, welding leads with exposed conductors were not replaced:  A. At the Miller 22A Number 11 wire feeder the copper wire was exposed and had been wrapped with black electrical tape.  B. At the Delta Welder 452 wire gun Number 14, the copper wire was exposed and had been wrapped with beige masking tape.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1260
  • · Z (S) $2100

1910.304 G05

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 3, 2014
Abate by
Feb 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,260 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.304(g)(5): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, and enclosures was not permanent, continuous, and effective  In the fabrication shop an extension cord used to energize a De Walt grinder was missing its ground pin. Employees were exposed to potential electrical shock.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1260
  • · Z (S) $2100

1910.305 G02 III

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 3, 2014
Abate by
Feb 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that tension would not be transmitted to joints or terminal screws:  Throughout the fabrication shop strain relief was not provided for flexible cords and cables such as, but not limited to:  A. Electrical extension cords.  B. Wall mounted electrical junction boxes.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1680
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jan 3, 2014
Abate by
Feb 25, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met  At this steel and metal fabrication establishment, the employer did not develop and implement a hazard communication program for the employees performing welding operations whom were exposed to hazardous chemicals, fumes, and gases while performing various welding activities.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1680
  • · Z (S) $2800

1904.40 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Jan 3, 2014
Abate by
Jan 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $700 · Current $420 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.40(a): The employer did not provide an authorized government representative the records within the four business hours.  On or about August 29, 2013, at this establishment, the employer failed to provide copies of the injury and illness records to an authorized representative within four hours.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $420
  • · Z (O) $700

1910.147 C06 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 3, 2014
Abate by
Jan 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $700 · Current $420 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed:   At this establishment, the employer had not conducted a periodic inspection of its program for control of hazardous energy (lockout/tagout) within the past year.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $420
  • · Z (O) $700

View Strong Structural Steel, LTD.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339364184.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.