Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: DEMAK INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of DEMAK INC. in 3210 BUFORD DRIVE, BUFORD, GA 30519 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 339366908.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Demak INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Demak INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
DEMAK INC.
Site address
3210 BUFORD DRIVE
City
BUFORD
State
GA
ZIP
30519
Mailing
4012 STILESBORO WAY, KENNESAW, GA 30152
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
9
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2013
Abate by
Dec 5, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,760 · Current $1,760
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.  On or about August 26, 2013, at 3210 Buford Drive, Buford, Georgia:  An employee performing framing work was exposed to struck-by hazards from wood chips and sawdust when he used a Makita 5700F circular saw without wearing safety glasses.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1760

1926.451 G04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2013
Abate by
Dec 5, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,200 · Current $2,200
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(i): Guardrail systems were not installed along all open sides and ends of platforms before being released for use by employees other than erection/dismantling crews:  On or about August 26, 2013, at 3210 Buford Drive, Buford, Georgia:  An employee performing framing work was exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 11.7-feet when he worked at the unprotected edge of a tubular welded frame scaffold work platform.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2200

1926.453 B02 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2013
Abate by
Dec 5, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,200 · Current $2,200
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(iv): Employee(s) working in an aerial lift were not standing firmly on the floor of the basket:  On or about August 26, 2013, at 3210 Buford Drive, Buford, Georgia:  An employee performing framing work from an aerial lift was exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 13-feet and greater when he stood on the mid rails of the basket while working.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2200

1926.453 B02 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2013
Abate by
Dec 5, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and/or a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift:Note:  As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system.  The use of a body belt in a tethering system or in a restraint system is acceptable and is regulated:  On or about August 26, 2013, at 3210 Buford Drive, Buford, Georgia:  An employee performing framing work was exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 13-feet and greater when he worked from the aerial lift basket without tying off to the basket.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2013
Abate by
Dec 5, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,200 · Current $2,200
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.  On or about August 26, 2013, at 3210 Buford Drive, Buford, Georgia:  An employee performing framing work was exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 16.7-feet and greater when he worked at the unprotected edge of the building without using fall protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2200

View Demak INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339366908.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.