CLEVELAND, OH —
OSHA Inspection: AUTOMATED PACKAGING SYSTEMS, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of AUTOMATED PACKAGING SYSTEMS, INC. in 13555 MCCRAKEN RD., CLEVELAND, OH 44125 (NAICS 326113). OSHA activity number 339446916.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- AUTOMATED PACKAGING SYSTEMS, INC.
- Site address
- 13555 MCCRAKEN RD.
- City
- CLEVELAND
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 44125
- Mailing
- 10175 PHILIPP PKWY., STREETSBORO, OH 44241
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 326113
- Employees
- 110
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Mar 4, 2014
- Abate by
- Mar 27, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $35,000 · Current $3,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees from hazards created by in-going nip points, rotating parts, and/or flying chips and sparks: On or before 10/24/2013, the employer failed to ensure that the ingoing nip points on the #9 Flexographic printing press, located in the Garfield press department, was effectively guarded. Automated Packaging Systems, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number: 898176, citation #: 01 item: 02 and was, affirmed as a final order on 10/02/2013, with respect to a workplace located at 13555 Mccraken Rd. Cleveland, OH.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $3500
- — C (R) $35000
- — Z (R) $35000
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Mar 4, 2014
- Abate by
- Dec 15, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $3,500
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees from hazards created by in-going nip points, rotating parts, and/or flying chips: The Employer did not ensure that in-going nip points on a printing press were fully and completely guarded.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $3500
- — C (S) $3500
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Mar 4, 2014
- Abate by
- Dec 15, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $3,500
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees from hazards created by in-going nip points, rotating parts, and/or flying chips: The Employer did not ensure that in-going nip points on a printing press were fully and completely guarded.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $3500
- — C (S) $3500
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Mar 4, 2014
- Abate by
- Dec 15, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $3,500
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees from hazards created by in-going nip points, rotating parts, and/or flying chips: The Employer did not ensure that in-going nip points on a printing press were fully and completely guarded.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $3500
- — C (S) $3500
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Mar 4, 2014
- Abate by
- Dec 15, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $3,500
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees from hazards created by in-going nip points, rotating parts, and/or flying chips: The Employer did not ensure that in-going nip points on a printing press were fully and completely guarded.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $3500
- — C (S) $3500
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Mar 4, 2014
- Abate by
- Dec 15, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $3,500
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees from hazards created by in-going nip points, rotating parts, and/or flying chips: The Employer did not ensure that in-going nip points on a printing press were fully and completely guarded.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $3500
- — C (S) $3500
- — Z (S) $3500
More inspections at Automated Packaging Systems, INC.
View Automated Packaging Systems, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 326113)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339446916.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.