Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: Z & P BUILDERS

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of Z & P BUILDERS in ELITE BAKERY CHALAN SAN ANTONIO, TAMUNING, GU 96913 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339453433.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Z & P Builders — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Z & P Builders is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
Z & P BUILDERS
Site address
ELITE BAKERY CHALAN SAN ANTONIO
City
TAMUNING
State
GU
ZIP
96913
Mailing
PO BOX 12208, YIGO, GU 96929
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 4, 2013
Abate by
Dec 26, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,800 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe condition(s) and the regulation(s) applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazard(s) or other exposure to illness or injury    At the project site on November 1, 2013, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not instruct employees in the recognition and avoidance of the unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to control or eliminate the exposure to electrical hazards while in the proximity of voltages below 600v nominal, thus exposing employees to electrical hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $1800

1926.416 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 4, 2013
Abate by
Dec 26, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.416(a)(1): No employer shall permit an employee to work in such proximity to any part of an electric power circuit that the employee could contact the electric power circuit in the course of work, unless the employee is protected against electric shock by deenergizing the circuit and grounding it or by guarding it effectively by insulation or other means.  At the project site on November 1, 2013, and at times prior thereto, an 8 foot fiberglass stepladder used to access the work area was leaning up against unguarded energized secondary lines.  Employees were exposed to electrical shock and/or fatality from accidental contact with live parts.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.404 F06

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 4, 2013
Abate by
Dec 26, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,080 · Current $810 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.404(f)(6): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, or enclosures was not permanent and continuous:    At the project site on November 1, 2013, and at times prior thereto, the path to ground was not permanent and continuous. A 50 foot extension cord had an "Open Ground." The cord was used in conjunction with a Makita NHP1300S 1/2 inch Hammer Drill.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $810
  • — Z (S) $1080

1926.501 B10

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 4, 2013
Abate by
Dec 26, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,440 · Current $1,080 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels and 50-feet (15.25 m) wide or less, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety nets:    At the project site on November 1, 2013, and at times prior thereto, employees were not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. Employees were installing sheet metal flashing, and were exposed to fall hazards of about 14 feet from the roof  to the ground.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1080
  • — Z (S) $1440

1926.502 D15

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 4, 2013
Abate by
Dec 26, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,440 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorage points used for attachment of personal fall arrest equipment were not  independent of any anchorage point being used to support or suspend platforms and capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee.    At the project site on November 1, 2013, and at times prior thereto, employees used a 2 inch X 4 inch wooden midrail as their anchorage device.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $1440

1926.503 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 4, 2013
Abate by
Dec 26, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,080 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer.    At the project site on November 1, 2013, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written certification record.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $1080

View Z & P Builders's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339453433.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.