Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ZONE ENTERPRISES

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ZONE ENTERPRISES in 2025 SOUTH VANDEVENTER AVENUE, SAINT LOUIS, MO 63110 (NAICS 339991). OSHA activity number 339572406.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Zone Enterprises — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Zone Enterprises is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ZONE ENTERPRISES
Site address
2025 SOUTH VANDEVENTER AVENUE
City
SAINT LOUIS
State
MO
ZIP
63110
Mailing
2025 SOUTH VANDEVENTER AVENUE, SAINT LOUIS, MO 63110
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
339991
Employees
80
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 II

Serious Gravity 10 6 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 19, 2014
Abate by
Mar 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $3,430 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii):   The procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy, and the means to enforce compliance including, but not limited to, the following: (B) Specific procedural steps for shutting down, isolating, blocking and securing machines or equipment to control hazardous energy.  Zone Enterprises did not have specific procedural steps for shutting down, isolating, blocking and securing machines or equipment to control hazardous energy for machines with multiple energy sources.  Two Bridgeport milling machines, two LeBlond horizontal lathes, and  two Atom CNC Machines, model #s S530CN located in the plant did not have specific procedural steps for locking/tagging out.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3430
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 10 6 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 19, 2014
Abate by
Mar 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i):  The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirements of this standard were being followed.  Zone Enterprises did not conduct periodic inspections for two Bridgeport milling machines, two LeBlond horizontal lathes and two Atom CNC Machines, model #s S530CN.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C07 I A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 19, 2014
Abate by
Mar 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(A):   Each authorized employee did not receive training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation and control.  Zone Enterprises did not provide training to their authorized employees in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation and control.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 6 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 19, 2014
Abate by
Mar 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $3,430 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1):   Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding were not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks.  On 2/4/2014, employees from Zone Enterprises were exposed to hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks.  The following machines did not have guards:  Two Bridgeport milling machines; two LeBlond horizontal lathes; and two Atom CNC Machines, model #s S530CN.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3430
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.212 B

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 19, 2014
Abate by
Mar 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.212(b):   Anchoring fixed machinery. Machines designed for a fixed location were not securely anchored to prevent walking or moving.   On 2/4/2014, Zone Enterprises had not securely anchored a pedestal sander and bench grinder in the maintenance area.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.213 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 19, 2014
Abate by
Mar 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.213(c)(1):   Each circular hand-fed ripsaw was not guarded by a hood which completely enclosed that portion of the saw above the table and that portion of the saw above the material being cut.  On 2/4/2014, an employee from Zone Enterprises was exposed to point of operation hazards.  A table saw, serial # 95H9721, was in the maintenance area and did not have a guard in place, which completely enclosed the portion of the blade above the table or the material being cut.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.213 A09

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 19, 2014
Abate by
Mar 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.213(a)(9):   All belts, pulleys, gears, shafts, and moving parts shall be guarded.  On 2/4/2014, Zone Enterprises had not installed a guard on a table saw, serial # 95H9721, to cover the exposed belt and pulley on the motor.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 19, 2014
Abate by
Mar 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9):   Exposure adjustment. Safety guards of the types described in Subparagraphs (3) and (4) of this paragraph, where the operator stands in front of the opening, were not constructed so that the peripheral protecting member could be adjusted to the constantly decreasing diameter of the wheel.  On 2/4/2014, an employee from Zone Enterprises was exposed to struck-by hazards.   The tongue guards on a pedestal grinder in the sanding/grinding area were not adjusted to one-fourth inch.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C05 II D

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 19, 2014
Abate by
Mar 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(5)(ii)(D):   Identifiable. Lockout devices and tagout devices did not indicate the identity of the employee applying the device(s).  Zone Enterprises did not provide or ensure lockout and tagout devices indicated the identity of the employee applying the devices.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Zone Enterprises's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339572406.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.