DALLAS, TX —
OSHA Inspection: CHANDLER SIGNS LP, LLP
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of CHANDLER SIGNS LP, LLP in 3201 MANOR WAY, DALLAS, TX 75235 (NAICS 339950). OSHA activity number 339574691.
What this inspection record means
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Watch Chandler Signs LP, LLP — free
Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Chandler Signs LP, LLP is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CHANDLER SIGNS LP, LLP
- Site address
- 3201 MANOR WAY
- City
- DALLAS
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 75235
- Mailing
- 3201 MANOR WAY, DALLAS, TX 75235
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 339950
- Employees
- 287
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
22 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 5, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $3,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer does not furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which are free from recognized caught in hazards that are causing or likely to cause serious physical harm to his employees: This violation occurred on or about February 19, 2014, in the Custom Department; where the employer, by not ensuring that the foot-operated control to the Spartan ironworkers was covered to prevent accidental and unintended actuation, exposed employees to amputation hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3000
- — Z (S) $7000
1910.22 A02
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 5, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,400 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(2): The floor of every workroom was not maintained in a clean and, so far as possible, a dry condition: The employer does not ensure that workroom floors are maintained in a clean condition. This violation was observed on or about February 05, 2014, in Building 1 in the Plex and Custom Department; where electrical cords and welding cables were lying on the floor in the work areas exposing employees to trip and fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4400
1910.37 B05
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 5, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,400 · Current $2,640 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(5): Each doorway or passage along an exit access that could be mistaken for an exit was not marked "Not an Exit" or similar designation, or be identified by a sign indicating its actual use (e.g., closet): The employer does not ensure that employees have safe access to building exits. This violation was observed on or about March 19, 2014, in Pylons Department; where the employees work near a door way that had a missing exit sign. The door way is not marked as an emergency exit.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $2640
- — Z (S) $4400
1910.133 A03
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 7, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,400 · Current $2,640 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(3): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee who wore prescription lenses while engaged in operations that involved eye hazards wore eye protection that incorporated the prescription in its design, or wore eye protection that could be worn over the prescription lenses without disturbing the proper position of the prescription lenses or the protective lenses: The employer does not ensure that employees, who wear prescription lenses, are protected from eye injuries. This violation was observed on or about February 05, 2014, in Building 1; where at least four (4) employees, who wore prescription lenses while operating pneumatic staple guns, did not have eye protection that were tested for ANSI Z87-1.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2640
- — Z (S) $4400
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $5,500 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in the activities covered by this section: The employer does not ensure that employees, who service and maintain equipment and machines, are protected from the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy. This violation was discovered on or about February 21, 2014; where employees, who replaced copper wire on a CNC machine, did not have written procedures to control potential hazardous energy.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $5500
1910.147 C05 II
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 5, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $5,500 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(5)(ii): Lockout devices and tagout devices were used for other purposes: The employer does not ensure that employees are protected from unexpected release of energy. This violation was discovered on or about February 21, 2014, in the Assembly Department; where the employer used a tagout device to remove equipment from service.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $5500
1910.147 C07 I
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program were understood by employees and that the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage, and removal of the energy controls were acquired by employees: The employer does not ensure that authorized and affected employees are trained on the purpose and function of the energy control program and that the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage, and removal of the energy controls are acquired by employees. This violation was discovered on or about February 21, 2014; where an affected employee, who repairs/replaces copper wire on a CNC machine, was not trained on the energy control program, and exposed to the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $7000
1910.157 C01
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 5, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,300 · Current $1,980 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1): The employer did not provide portable fire extinguishers and mount, locate and identify them so that they were readily accessible to employees without subjecting the employees to possible injury: The employer does not ensure that employees are protected from fire hazards. This violation was observed on or about February 05, 2014; a) in the Custom Department; where at least one (1) fire extinguisher is not readily accessible to employees; b) in the Assembly Department; where at least two (2) fire extinguishers were not readily accessible to employees.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $1980
- — Z (S) $3300
1910.176 A
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 5, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $5,500 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.176(a): Permanent aisles and passageways were not appropriately marked: The employer does not ensure that employees are protected from struck-by hazards. This violation was discovered on February 05, 2014, in the Customs Department; where permanent aisle ways were not marked exposing employees to the hazard of being struck-by powered industrial trucks.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $5500
1910.178 L04 III
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,400 · Current $2,640 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not conducted at least once every three years: The employer does not ensure that employees are protected from struck-by and/or crushed-by hazards. This violation was discovered on February 05, 2014; where the employer had not evaluated each powered industrial truck operator's performance within the past three years.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $2640
- — Z (S) $4400
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 14, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $5,500 · Current $3,300 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: The employer does not ensure that employees are protected from the hazards associated with rotating parts. This violation was discovered on or about February 05, 2014, in the Assembly Department; where at least two (2) employees use a drill press without a chip guard or shield.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3300
- — Z (S) $5500
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 14, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $5,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): The point of operation of machines whose operation exposed employees to injury, was not guarded: The employer does not protect employees from stuck by and caught in hazards. This violation was observed on or about February 05, 2014; a) In the Plex Department; where at least two (2) employees operates the Ridgid table saw, not protected from contacting the point of operation; b) In the Plex Department; where at least two (e) employees operates the DeWalt miter saw, not protected from contacting the point of operation; c) In the Custom Department; where at least one (1) employee operates a Ridgid band saw, not protected from contacting the point of operation;
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $5000
- — Z (S) $7000
1910.212 B
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 14, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,400 · Current $2,640 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(b): The employer did not ensure that machines designed for a fixed location are securely anchored to prevent walking or moving: The employer does not protect employees from struck by hazards. a) This violation was discovered on or about February 05, 2014; where at least one (1) employee uses a drill press not anchored to prevent moving; b) This violation was discovered on or about March 19, 2014; where at least one (1) employee uses a band saw not anchored to prevent moving.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $2640
- — Z (S) $4400
1910.219 F03
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 14, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $5,500 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(f)(3): The employer did not All sprocket wheels and chains were not enclosed unless they are more than seven (7) feet above the floor or platform: The employer did not protect employees from caught in hazards. This violation occurred on or about March 19, 2014; where the employer did not ensure that employees are protected from rotating sprocket wheels and chains, located in the rear of an Accurshear machine in Building 2.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $5500
1910.242 B
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 5, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,400 · Current $2,640 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.242(b): Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 psi and effective chip guarding and personal protective equipment was not used: The employer does not ensure that employees are protected from the hazards created by compressed air. This violation was observed on or about February 05, 2014; where at least six (6) employees used compressed air that was not reduced to less than 30 psi for cleaning purposes.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2640
- — Z (S) $4400
1910.252 B02 I A
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 5, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $6,600 · Current $2,640 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.252(b)(2)(i)(A): Helmets or hand shields were not used during all arc welding or arc cutting operations: The employer does not ensure that employees are protected from light radiation hazards. This violation was observed on or about February 05, 2014, in the Custom Department, where employees, who were arc welding, were not using welding helmets.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $2640
- — Z (S) $6600
1910.303 B02
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 14, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,400 · Current $2,640 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2): The employer did not ensure that listed or labeled equipment are installed and used in accordance with any instructions included in the listing or labeling: The employer does not ensure that employees are protected from shock and/or electrocution hazards. This violation occurred on or about February 05, 2014, throughout the facility of Building 2; where the employer did not ensure that electrical outlet boxes are used in accordance with instructions in the listed or labeling.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $2640
- — Z (S) $4400
1910.304 G05
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 14, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,400 · Current $2,640 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.304(g)(5): The employer did not ensure that the path to ground from circuits, equipment, and enclosures are permanent, continuous, and effective: The employer does not protect employees from electrical hazards. This violation occurred on or about February 19, 2014, on a table saw in the Plex Department; where the employer did not ensure that the path to ground from equipment is effective.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2640
- — Z (S) $4400
1910.305 B01 I
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 14, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,400 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(i): Employer did not ensure that conductors entering cutout boxes, cabinets, or fittings are protected from abrasion, and openings through which conductors enter are effectively closed: The employer does not ensure that employees are protected from electrical hazards. This violation was discovered on or about February 05, 2014, at the bender machine in the Custom Department; where the employer did not ensure that conductors are protected from strain.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $4400
1910.305 G01 IV A
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 14, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $5,500 · Current $3,300 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A): The employer did not ensure flexible cords are used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure: The employer does not ensure that employees are protected from electrical hazards. This violation was discovered on or about February 05, 2014, in the Plex Department; where the employer did not ensure flexible cords are not used as a substitute for fixed wiring.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $3300
- — Z (S) $5500
1910.305 G02 III
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 14, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $5,500 · Current $3,300 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords and cables were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief was provided that would prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws: The employer does not protect employees from electrical hazards by ensuring that flexible cords and cables do not have strain relief. This violation was discovered on or about February 05, 2014, in the Plex Department: a) near a table saw, where a flexible extension cord used have strain relief; b) near a band saw, where a flexible extension cord used have strain relief.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3300
- — Z (S) $5500
1910.305 B01 II
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 14, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $2,640
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii): Unused openings in cabinets, boxes, and fittings were not effectively closed: The employer does not ensure that employees are protected from electrical hazards. This violation was discovered on or about February 05, 2014, on the east wall of the Custom Department; where the employer did not ensure that unused openings in cabinets, boxes and fittings were effectively closed.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2640
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Chandler Signs LP, LLP
View Chandler Signs LP, LLP's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 339950)
Jul 9, 2026
161533 - Direct Wholesale Signs LLC · KINGS MOUNTAIN, NC
Jul 7, 2026
161498 - Seven Springs, INC. · APEX, NC
Jun 30, 2026
111500 - Signminds INC · MINNEAPOLIS, MN
Jun 29, 2026
161462 - Carolina Sign and Service, LLC · ANGIER, NC
Jun 17, 2026
Rapp Signs, INC. · GREENE, NY
More inspections in TX
Jul 24, 2026
Midtex Masonry, LLC · DALLAS, TX
Jul 23, 2026
Harvey Cleary · SOCORRO, TX
Jul 23, 2026
Wiwynn · SOCORRO, TX
Jul 23, 2026
Element 7 Concrete · AUSTIN, TX
Jul 23, 2026
DPT, a Viatris Company · SAN ANTONIO, TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339574691.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.