Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SALCO, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of SALCO, INC. in 5955 SHERIDAN BLVD., ARVADA, CO 80003 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 339657553.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Salco, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Salco, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
SALCO, INC.
Site address
5955 SHERIDAN BLVD.
City
ARVADA
State
CO
ZIP
80003
Mailing
5955 SHERIDAN BLVD., ARVADA, CO 80003
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332710
Employees
38
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.215 A04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 5, 2014
Abate by
May 22, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,975 · Current $1,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Work rest(s) on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one eighth inch:     (a) On or about April 1, 2014, and at times prior, Salco, Inc. did not ensure that the work rest on a Baldor grinding machine was adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one eight inch. The Baldor grinding machine was observed with an opening of approximately one quarter inch between the work rest and the abrasive wheel, exposing employees to struck-by hazards.     Abatement Note: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1500
  • — Z (S) $2975

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 5, 2014
Abate by
May 22, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch:   (a) On or about April 1, 2014, and at times prior, Salco,Inc. did not ensure that the distance between the abrasive wheel and the adjustable tongue guard did not exceed one fourth inch. A Baldor bench grinder was observed with a gap of approximately 1 inch between the abrasive wheel and the tongue guard exposing employees to struck-by hazards.   Abatement Note: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.219 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 5, 2014
Abate by
May 22, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,380 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(4)(i): Unguarded shaft end(s) projected more than one half the diameter of the shaft:     (a) On or about April 1, 2014, and at times prior, Salco, Inc. did not ensure that rotating horizontal shafts did not project more than one half the diameter of the shaft. Lathe machine # 9 was operated with an unguarded rotating horizontal shaft of 2 inches in diameter. Shaft extended approximately 1.5 inches exposing employees to caught-in hazards.     Abatement Note: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2380

1910.305 G02 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 5, 2014
Abate by
May 22, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,380 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords and cables were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided that will prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints and/or terminal screws:     (a) On or about April 1, 2014, and at times prior, Salco, Inc. did not ensure that flexible cords and cables were connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief was provided that would prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints and/or terminal screws. The 220V electrical cords connecting a Gusher coolant pump to the Retro table #5 showed signs of strain exposing the live inner wire insulation.     Abatement Note: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2380

1910.147 C04 I

Repeat Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 5, 2014
Abate by
May 22, 2014
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $3,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:     (a) On or about April 1,2014, and at times prior, Salco, Inc. did not ensure that procedures were developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section. Employees in the cutting materials shop were exposed to amputation hazards by not putting a lockout on the HEM horizontal saw while changing the cutting blade.     Abatement Note: Abatement certification and documentation are required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").           Salco, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard, which was contained in OSHA inspection number 315019711, citation number 1, item number 3 and was affirmed as a final order on June 3, 2011, with respect to a workplace located at 5955 Sheridan Blvd. Arvada, CO 80003.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $3500
  • — Z (R) $7000

1910.242 B

Repeat Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 5, 2014
Abate by
May 22, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $2,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.242(b): Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.:     (a) On or about April 1, 2014, and at times prior, Salco, Inc. did not ensure that compressed air used for cleaning purposes was reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.. A compressed air nozzle in the cutting materials shop was observed with a tampered tip that allowed air pressure in excess of 50 p.s.i., exposing employees to air injection hazards.    Abatement Note: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").    Salco, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard, which was contained in OSHA inspection number 315019711, citation number 2, item number 2 and was affirmed as a final order on June 3, 2011, with respect to a workplace located at 5955 Sheridan Blvd. Arvada, CO 80003.    Salco, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard, which was contained in OSHA inspection number 310592860, citation number 1 , item number 5 and was affirmed as a final order on December 3, 2007, with respect to a workplace located at 5955 Sheridan Blvd. Arvada, CO 80003.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $2100
  • — Z (R) $4200

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 5, 2014
Abate by
May 22, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:   (a) On or about April 1, 2014, and at times prior, Salco, Inc. did not ensure that employees required to use respirators were provided with a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use such respirator. Employees in the polishing room were required to used both North half-face and Moldex N-95 respirators, without a medical evaluation prior to using the respirator.   Abatement Note: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 F02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 5, 2014
Abate by
May 22, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator were not annually fit tested:   (a) On or about April 1, 2014, and at times prior, Salco, Inc. did not ensure that employees using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were annually fit tested. Employees in the polishing room were not fit tested prior to using such respirators.   Abatement Note: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.157 G01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 38 exposed
Issued
May 5, 2014
Abate by
May 22, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(1): An educational program was not provided for all employees to familiarize them with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting:   (a) On or about April 1, 2014, and at times prior, Salco, Inc. did not ensure that employees expected to be involved with incipient stage fire fighting, were provided with an educational program to familiarize them with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards associated with incipient stage fire fighting.   Abatement Note: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 F06 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 5, 2014
Abate by
May 22, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(i): Except as provided in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(7) and 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(8), the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the information required by 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(1)(i) through 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(1)(v):   (a) On or about April 1, 2014, and at times prior, Salco, Inc. did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked. An unmarked 1 quart spray bottle with diluted degreaser was observed in the Lathe department, exposing employees to chemical hazards.   Abatement Note: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Salco, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339657553.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.