ARVADA, CO —
OSHA Inspection: SALCO, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SALCO, INC. in 5955 SHERIDAN BLVD., ARVADA, CO 80003 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 342047164.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SALCO, INC.
- Site address
- 5955 SHERIDAN BLVD.
- City
- ARVADA
- State
- CO
- ZIP
- 80003
- Mailing
- 5955 SHERIDAN BLVD., ARVADA, CO 80003
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332710
- Employees
- 36
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.22 A02
- Issued
- Feb 8, 2017
- Abate by
- Feb 14, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $5,577 · Current $2,789 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(2): (2) The floor of each workroom was not maintained in a clean and, to the extent feasible, in a dry condition. When wet processes were used, drainage were not maintained and, to the extent feasible, dry standing places, such as false floors, platforms, and mats were not provided: a) On or about January 23, 2017 and at times prior, an employee was exposed to slipping hazards from spilled machine oil on the floor. The machine oil was coming from CNC machines that were missing cover panels.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $2789
- — C (S) $5577
- — Z (S) $5577
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Feb 8, 2017
- Abate by
- Feb 14, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $6,972 · Current $3,486 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l): a) On or about January 23, 2017 and at times prior, two employees were required to operate a Hyster 90 XL forklift without certification. The operators were not certified through training and evaluation prior to operating the forklift.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $3486
- — C (S) $6972
- — Z (S) $6972
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Feb 8, 2017
- Abate by
- Feb 14, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $8,365 · Current $4,183 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: a) On or about January 23, 2017 and at times prior, employees were exposed to serious injuries from the point of operation of two lathe machines. The machine was not provided with a chip guard to prevent flying chips.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $4183
- — C (S) $8365
- — Z (S) $8365
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Feb 8, 2017
- Abate by
- Feb 14, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s): a) On or about January 23, 2017 and at times prior, employees were exposed to serious injuries from the point of operation of several CNC machines. Employees were observed accessing the point of operation by opening the door guards of the CNC machines. The door interlock unit was missing from the following CNC machines to include but is not limited to the following: 1. Star Micronics model SR-16 2. Star Micronics model SR-20 3. Star Micronics model SX-12 4. Nakamura Tome model TMC-15 5. Mori Seiki model SL-15 6. Takamaz model EX-10 7. Upgrade model TMC-22 8. Mori Seiki model SL-1A
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.157 E03
- Issued
- Feb 8, 2017
- Abate by
- Feb 14, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $782 · Current $391 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(3): Portable fire extinguishers were not subjected to an annual maintenance check: Note: Applies to any extinguishers provided in the workplace. Maintenance check includes an internal examination, except extinguishers with stored pressure: a) On or about January 23, 2017 and at times prior, several portable fire extinguishers located in the shop area were not annually maintained. The portable fire extinguishers have an annual maintenance date of February 2015.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $391
- — C (O) $782
- — Z (O) $782
More inspections at Salco, INC.
View Salco, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332710)
More inspections in CO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342047164.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.