CAMDEN, NJ —
OSHA Inspection: AMERINOX PROCESSING, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of AMERINOX PROCESSING, INC. in 2201 MOUNT EPHRAIM AVENUE HARRIS TERMINAL BUILDING 90, CAMDEN, NJ 08104 (NAICS 331315). OSHA activity number 339733305.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- AMERINOX PROCESSING, INC.
- Site address
- 2201 MOUNT EPHRAIM AVENUE HARRIS TERMINAL BUILDING 90
- City
- CAMDEN
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 08104
- Mailing
- 2201 MOUNT EPHRAIM AVENUE HARRIS TERMINAL BUILDING 90, CAMDEN, NJ 08104
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 331315
- Employees
- 40
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
13 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.101 B
- Issued
- Sep 17, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 14, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.101(b): The in-plant handling, storage, and utilization of all compressed gases in cylinders, portable tanks, rail tankcars, or motor vehicle cargo tanks were not in accordance with Compressed Gas Association Pamphlet P-1-1965, which is incorporated by reference as specified in CFR 1910.6: a) Maintenance Area: On or about April 21, 2014, the storage of compressed gases in cylinders did not conform to the requirements of the Compressed Gas Association Pamphlet P-1-1965 requiring cylinders to be secured against falling. As a result, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards. b) Facility: On or about July 28, 2014, the storage of fire extinguishers did not conform to the requirements of the Compressed Gas Association Pamphlet P-1-1965 requiring cylinders to be secured against falling. As a result, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards. NOTE: THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION FOR THIS ITEM. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (3)
- — J (O) $1000
- — C (S) $3500
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.135 A01
- Issued
- Sep 17, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 14, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.135(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee wore a protective helmet when working in areas where there is a potential for injury to the head from falling objects: a) Facility: On or about April 21, 2014, employees were exposed to "struck-by" hazards while working in areas with overhead cranes. NOTE: THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION FOR THIS ITEM. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (3)
- — J (O) $1000
- — C (S) $4200
- — Z (S) $4200
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Sep 17, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 14, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $4,900
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section: a) Bay 2: On or about April 21, 2014, the employer did not ensure that employees utilized Lockout/Tagout procedures. NOTE: IN ADDITION TO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION, THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION FOR THIS ITEM. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $4900
- — C (S) $4900
- — Z (S) $4900
1910.147 C07 I A
- Issued
- Sep 17, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 14, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $4,900
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(A): Authorized employee(s) did not receive training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation: a) Facility: On or about April 21, 2014, the employer did not provide Lockout/Tagout training to employees. NOTE: IN ADDITION TO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION, THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION FOR THIS ITEM. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $4900
- — C (S) $4900
- — Z (S) $4900
1910.303 B02
- Issued
- Sep 17, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 14, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2): Listed or labeled electrical equipment was not used or installed in accordance with instructions included in the listing or labeling: a) Bay 1: On or about July 28, 2014, employees were exposed to electrical hazards while using an outlet box that was not properly mounted. NOTE: THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION FOR THIS ITEM. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (3)
- — J (O) $1000
- — C (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.305 B01
- Issued
- Sep 17, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 14, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1): Unused openings in boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed: a) Maintenance Area: On or about April 21, 2014, employees were exposed to electrical shock hazards while using metal electrical outlet boxes that were missing knockouts. NOTE: THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION FOR THIS ITEM. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (3)
- — J (O) $1000
- — C (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.1200 F05 I
- Issued
- Sep 17, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 14, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(i): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemical(s) contained therein: a) Maintenance Area: On or about April 21, 2014, containers of chemicals stored and used by employees were not properly labeled. An unlabeled plastic bottle containing oil was stored in the maintenance area. b) Bay 3: On or about April 21, 2014, containers of chemicals stored and used by employees were not properly labeled. An unlabeled spray bottle of WD40 used by machine operators was stored near the ROWE Machine. c) Maintenance Area: On or about July 28, 2014, containers of chemicals stored and used by employees were not properly labeled. An unlabeled container of hydraulic oil was stored in the maintenance area. d) Bay 1: On or about July 28, 2014, containers of chemicals stored and used by employees were not properly labeled. An unlabeled plastic bottle containing Trichloroethylene was stored near the Hot Rolled Cut-to-Length Line. NOTE: THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION FOR THIS ITEM. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $2800
- — C (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.1200 F05 II
- Issued
- Sep 17, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 14, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the appropriate hazard warnings: a) Bay 1: On or about July 28, 2014, containers of chemicals stored and used by employees were not properly labeled. Containers near the Hot Rolled Cut-to-Length Line labeled "Trichloroethylene" were not marked with hazard warnings. NOTE: THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION FOR THIS ITEM. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.179 L03 II
- Issued
- Sep 17, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 23, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $42,000 · Current $24,700 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.179(l)(3)(ii): Adjustments on crane(s) were not maintained to assure correct function of brakes: a) Bay 1: On or about April 21, 2014, employees were exposed to "struck-by" hazards while moving metal stock using Crane 8. According to periodic inspection records for Crane 8, the hoist brake shoes needed replacing, and the bridge brake coil was missing and needed to be replaced. NOTE: IN ADDITION TO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION, THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION FOR THIS ITEM. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (3)
- — J (W) $24700
- — C (W) $42000
- — Z (W) $42000
1910.179 L03 I
- Issued
- Sep 17, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 23, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.179(l)(3)(i): Unsafe condition(s) disclosed during the frequent or periodic inspection(s) required by 29 CFR 1910.179(j) were not corrected before operation of the crane(s) was resumed: a) Bay 1: On or about April 21, 2014, employees were exposed to "struck-by" hazards while moving metal stock using Crane 8. According to periodic inspection records for Crane 8, the hoist brake shoes needed replacing, and the bridge brake coil was missing and needed to be replaced. NOTE: IN ADDITION TO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION, THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION FOR THIS ITEM. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (3)
- — J (R) $0
- — C (S) $4900
- — Z (S) $4900
1904.40 A
- Issued
- Sep 17, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 14, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $700 · Current $700
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.40(a): The employer did not provide an authorized government representative the records within the four business hours: a) Facility: On or about April 21, 2014 the compliance officer was not provided with a copy of the OSHA Form 301 for a recordable employee injury which occurred on April 9, 2014.
Recent events (3)
- — J (O) $700
- — C (O) $700
- — Z (O) $700
1910.147 C06 II
- Issued
- Sep 17, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 14, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(ii): The employer did not certify that periodic inspections of the energy control procedures had been performed: a) Facility: On or about April 21, 2014, the employer did not certify that periodic inspections of the Lockout/Tagout procedures were performed at least annually. Employees service and maintain various machines, which include but may not be limited to, Overhead Cranes and the Coil-to-Coil Polisher. NOTE: THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION FOR THIS ITEM. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (3)
- — J (O) $0
- — C (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.178 L06
- Issued
- Sep 17, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 14, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The certification did not include the name of the operator, the date of the training, the date of the evaluation, and the identity of the person(s) performing the training or evaluation: a) Facility: On or about April 21, 2014, the employer did not maintain certified records for each employee that was trained to operate forklifts. NOTE: THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION FOR THIS ITEM. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (3)
- — J (O) $0
- — C (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Amerinox Processing, INC.
View Amerinox Processing, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 331315)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339733305.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.