ELKHART LAKE, WI —
OSHA Inspection: BREMER MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.
Federal Agency inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a federal Agency health inspection of BREMER MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC. in W2002 COUNTY ROAD Q, ELKHART LAKE, WI 53020 (NAICS 331524). OSHA activity number 339762502.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BREMER MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.
- Site address
- W2002 COUNTY ROAD Q
- City
- ELKHART LAKE
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53020
- Mailing
- W2002 CTY RD. Q, ELKHART LAKE, WI 53020
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Federal Agency (M)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 331524
- Employees
- 97
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Nov 5, 2014
- Abate by
- Dec 29, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $7,000
1073
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): The employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures in any workplace where respirators are necessary to protect the health of the employee or whenever respirators are required by the employer: a) On or about 05/28/2014, the employer did not establish or implement a written respiratory protection program when the employer required a Molder employee to wear an Advantage 200LS tight-fitting half-face respirator with organic filters while conducting molding operations with Bioset chemicals in the New Molding area. All provisions of 29 CFR 1910.134(c) through (l) must be covered in a written respirator protection program. Key elements include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) Respirator selection 2) Medical evaluations 3) Fit testing 4) Procedures for use, care and maintenance 5) Employee information and training 6) Program evaluation
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $7000
- — C (S) $4900
- — Z (S) $4900
1910.134 F01
- Issued
- Nov 5, 2014
- Abate by
- Dec 29, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1073
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): a) On or about 05/28/2014, the employer did not ensure that a Molder employee who was required to wear an Advantage 200LS tight-fitting half-face respirator passed the appropriate QLFT or QNFT.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K01
- Issued
- Nov 5, 2014
- Abate by
- Dec 29, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1073
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide effective training that covered the required elements in 1910.134(k)(1)(i) through 1910.134(k)(1)(vii): a) On or about 05/28/2014, when the employer required a Molder employee to wear an Advantage 200LS tight-fitting half-face respirator, the employer did not provide the employee with effective training required by this section and did not ensure the Molder employee could demonstrate knowledge such as: 1) Why the respirator was necessary and how improper fit, usage or maintenance could compromise the protective effect of the respirator. 2) What the limitations and capabilities of the respirator were. 3) How to inspect, put on and remove, use, and check the seals of the respirator. 4) What the procedures are for maintenance and storage of the respirator. 5) How to recognize medical signs and symptoms that may limit or prevent the effective use of respirators. 6) The general requirement of this section.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1000 A02
- Issued
- Nov 5, 2014
- Abate by
- Dec 29, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $7,000
1073
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1000(a)(2): Other substances -- 8-hour Time Weighted Averages. An employee's exposure to any substance in Table Z-1, the exposure limit of which is not preceded by a "C", shall not exceed the 8-hour Time Weighted Average given for that substance any 8-hour work shift of a 40-hour work week: On or about 05/06/2014, the Company failed to perform 8 hour TWA sampling of chemicals listed in Table Z-1.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $7000
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1000 E
- Issued
- Nov 5, 2014
- Abate by
- Dec 29, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $7,000
1073
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1000(e): To achieve compliance with paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section, administrative or engineering controls must first be determined and implemented whenever feasible. When such controls are not feasible to achieve full compliance, protective equipment or any other protective measures shall be used to keep the exposure of employees to air contaminants within the limits prescribed in this section. Any equipment and/or technical measures used for this purpose must be approved for each particular use by a competent industrial hygienist or other technically qualified person. Whenever respirators are used, their use shall comply with 1910.134. [71 FR 16673, April 3, 2006]: On or about 05/06/2014, the Company failed to identify, test, and implement administrative or engineering controls to address hazardous substances identified in Table Z-1.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $7000
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Nov 5, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $70,000 · Current $37,000 Reduced
1073
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: a) On or about 05/06/2014, Airset Cell employees were not provided with effective information and training when the new hazardous chemical BioSet containing methylene bisphenyl isocynates (MDI) was introduced into the Airset Cell work area.
Recent events (3)
- — F (R) $37000
- — C (W) $70000
- — Z (W) $70000
1910.1048 N01
- Issued
- Nov 5, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
1290
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1048(n)(1): The employer did not ensure that all employees who were assigned to workplaces where there is exposure to formaldehyde participated in a training program: a) On or about 05/09/2014, the employer did not ensure an Airset Molder employee on second shift exposed to formaldehyde at a level of 0.19 ppm participated in a formaldehyde training program; b) On or about 05/09/2014, the employer did not ensure an Airset Knockout employee on second shift exposed to formaldehyde at a level of 0.22 ppm participated in a formaldehyde training program; The employees did not receive training on: 1) The contents of the SDS for the Alphaset chemicals; 2) Description of the potential health hazards and signs/symptoms associated with exposure to formaldehyde; 3) Instruction to immediately report to the employer the development of any adverse signs/symptoms; 4) Description of operations in the work area where formaldehyde is present; 5) Instructions for the handling of spills, emergencies and clean-up procedures. BREMER MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC. WAS PREVIOUSLY CITED FOR A VIOLATION OF THIS OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARD 29 CFR 1910.1048(n)(1) OR ITS EQUIVALENT WHICH WAS CONTAINED IN OSHA INSPECTION NUMBER 312554793, CITATION 1, ITEM 4b ISSUED ON 06/09/2010 WITH REGARD TO A WORKPLACE LOCATED AT W2002 COUNTY ROAD Q, ELKHART LAKE, WI 53020. FINAL ORDER 06/30/2010.
Recent events (3)
- — F (R) $7000
- — C (R) $7000
- — Z (R) $7000
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Nov 5, 2014
- Abate by
- Dec 29, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1073
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed: a) On or about 05/06/2014, the employer did not verify through a written certification that a hazard assessment for the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) had been completed when employees were using Alphaset and Bioset chemicals in the Airset Cell.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Bremer Manufacturing Company, INC.
View Bremer Manufacturing Company, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 331524)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339762502.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.