BENSENVILLE, IL ·
OSHA Inspection: BARAK BUSINESS SERVICES INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of BARAK BUSINESS SERVICES INC. in 538 N. YORK ROAD, BENSENVILLE, IL 60106 (NAICS 333244). OSHA activity number 339801235.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BARAK BUSINESS SERVICES INC.
- Site address
- 538 N. YORK ROAD
- City
- BENSENVILLE
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 60106
- Mailing
- 538 N. YORK ROAD, BENSENVILLE, IL 60106
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 333244
- Employees
- 22
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Oct 1, 2014
- Abate by
- Dec 1, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $800 Reduced
00401560
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer shall assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). Employees performing printing and silk screening activities were exposed to skin and eye irritation while using chemicals, such as inks and acetone, and the employer did not perform an adequate hazard assessment, which would necessitate the use of personal protective equipment. Abatement certification is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $800
- · Z (S) $1200
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Oct 1, 2014
- Abate by
- Dec 1, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
00401560
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation. Employees performing printing and silk screening activities were exposed to skin and eye irritation while using chemicals, such as inks and acetone, and the employer did not mandate the use of eye protection while performing these work activities. Abatement certification is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.138 A
- Issued
- Oct 1, 2014
- Abate by
- Dec 1, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
00401560
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances, severe cuts or lacerations, severe abrasions, punctures, chemical burns, thermal burns, and harmful temperature extremes. Employees performing printing and silk screening activities were exposed to skin and eye irritation while using chemicals, such as inks and acetone, and the employer did not mandate the use of hand protection while performing these work activities. Abatement certification is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.178 L04 III
- Issued
- Oct 1, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not conducted at least once every three years. Employees were being exposed to struck-by hazards while operating forklift(s) and the employer did not ensure that all forklift operators were reevaluated and/or recertified at least once every three years. There is no abatement certification or documentation required for this item.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $600
- · Z (S) $1200
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Oct 1, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
00400170032010801290
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: Employees performing printing and silk screening activities were exposed to skin and eye irritation while using chemicals, such as inks and acetone, and the employer did not ensure that a written Hazard Communication Program had been developed and implemented, which included training, proper labeling, and maintaining all Safety Data Sheets. There is no abatement certification or documentation required for this item.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $600
- · Z (S) $1200
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 333244)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339801235.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.