SPRINGFIELD, IL —
OSHA Inspection: BURETTA CONSTRUCTION & MANAGEMENT, INC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of BURETTA CONSTRUCTION & MANAGEMENT, INC in NEXT TO 1100 LEJUNE DR, SPRINGFIELD, IL 62701 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 339803413.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BURETTA CONSTRUCTION & MANAGEMENT, INC
- Site address
- NEXT TO 1100 LEJUNE DR
- City
- SPRINGFIELD
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 62701
- Mailing
- 18785 N STEEL LANE, WOODLAWN, IL 62898
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Nov 6, 2014
- Abate by
- Dec 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: On July 15, 2014, Buretta Construction & Management, was issued citations and the employer did not verify, through written certification that each citation was abated. Abatement certification was not received for the following violations: a. Citation 1 Item 1, and b. Citation 1 Item 4.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $400
1903.19 D01
- Issued
- Nov 6, 2014
- Abate by
- Dec 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required: On July 15, 2014, Buretta Construction & Management, was issued citations and the employer did not verify, through documents that each citation was abated. Abatement documentation was not received for the following violations: a. Citation 1 Item 2a, b & c.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $400
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Jul 15, 2014
- Abate by
- Jul 25, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s) Employees performing framing activities were exposed to a fall hazard, and the employer did not conduct frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials, and equipment.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Jul 15, 2014
- Abate by
- Jul 25, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. Employees performing framing activities were exposed to a fall hazard, and none of the fall protection systems specified above were used.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Jul 15, 2014
- Abate by
- Jul 25, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Employees performing framing activities were exposed to a fall hazard, and the employer had not instructed the employees in hazard recognition and the applicable regulations to their work environment.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.503 B01
- Issued
- Jul 15, 2014
- Abate by
- Jul 25, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written certification record containing the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employee: The employer did not maintain evidence of the required training for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards. There was no written documentation that included the employees name, date of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employee.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B14
- Issued
- Jul 15, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(14): Each employee working on, at, above, or near wall openings (including those with chutes attached) where the outside bottom edge of the wall opening is 6 feet or more above lower levels and the inside bottom edge of the wall opening Employees working on the third floor were exposed to a fall hazard because the wall opening did not have a guardrail installed.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.178 L02 II
- Issued
- Jul 15, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 1, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(2)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training consisting of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace. Prior to allowing employees to use the rough terrain forklift, the employer did not ensure that each operator had completed formal instruction training.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Buretta Construction & Management, INC
View Buretta Construction & Management, INC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339803413.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.