Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: BURETTA CONSTRUCTION & MANAGEMENT, INC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of BURETTA CONSTRUCTION & MANAGEMENT, INC in NEXT TO 1100 LEJUNE DR, SPRINGFIELD, IL 62701 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 339803413.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Buretta Construction & Management, INC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Buretta Construction & Management, INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
NEXT TO 1100 LEJUNE DR
City
SPRINGFIELD
State
IL
ZIP
62701
Mailing
18785 N STEEL LANE, WOODLAWN, IL 62898
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Nov 6, 2014
Abate by
Dec 12, 2014
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $400
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  On July 15, 2014, Buretta Construction & Management, was issued citations and the employer did not verify, through written certification that each citation was abated.  Abatement certification was not received for the following violations:        a.    Citation 1 Item 1, and      b.    Citation 1 Item 4.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $400

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Nov 6, 2014
Abate by
Dec 12, 2014
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $400
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required:   On July 15, 2014, Buretta Construction & Management, was issued citations and the employer did not verify, through documents that each citation was abated.  Abatement documentation was not received for the following violations:         a.    Citation 1 Item 2a, b & c.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $400

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Jul 15, 2014
Abate by
Jul 25, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s)    Employees performing framing activities were exposed to a fall hazard, and the employer did not conduct frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials, and equipment.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 15, 2014
Abate by
Jul 25, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.    Employees performing framing activities were exposed to a fall hazard, and none of the fall protection systems specified above were used.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 15, 2014
Abate by
Jul 25, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:    Employees performing framing activities were exposed to a fall hazard, and the employer had not instructed the employees in hazard recognition and the applicable regulations to their work environment.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.503 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 15, 2014
Abate by
Jul 25, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1):  The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written certification record containing the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employee:  The employer did not maintain evidence of the required training for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards.  There was no written documentation that included the employees name, date of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employee.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B14

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 15, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(14): Each employee working on, at, above, or near wall openings (including those with chutes attached) where the outside bottom edge of the wall opening is 6 feet or more above lower levels and the inside bottom edge of the wall opening    Employees working on the third floor were exposed to a fall hazard because the wall opening did not have a guardrail installed.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.178 L02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 15, 2014
Abate by
Aug 1, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(2)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training consisting of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace.  Prior to allowing employees to use the rough terrain forklift, the employer did not ensure that each operator had completed formal instruction training.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

View Buretta Construction & Management, INC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339803413.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.