Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: JOSE RANGEL

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JOSE RANGEL in 805 SMITHFIELD DR., JONESBORO, AR 72401 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 339815151.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Jose Rangel — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Jose Rangel is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
JOSE RANGEL
Site address
805 SMITHFIELD DR.
City
JONESBORO
State
AR
ZIP
72401
Mailing
1236 WILBEC ROAD, MEMPHIS, TN 38117
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Aug 13, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,200 · Current $2,200
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, shall be protected by protective helmets.  On or about June 19, 2014 and times prior thereto, employees of Jose Rangel were observed framing a two story residence being constructed at or near 805 Smithfield Drive in Jonesboro, Arkansas.  Employees were observed walking and working below employees working overhead on the rooftop.  The employer required the use of protective helmets, exposing employees to overhead hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2200

1926.451 A06

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Aug 13, 2014
Abate by
Aug 21, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,080 · Current $3,080
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(6): Scaffolds were not designed by a qualified person:  On or about June 19, 2014 and times prior thereto, employees of Jose Rangel were observed working and walking on assembled scaffolding while framing the two story residence being constructed at or near 805 Smithfield Drive in Jonesboro, Arkansas.  The scaffolding had been designed by Jose Rangel and the employees who were not qualified in scaffolding, exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3080

1926.451 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Aug 13, 2014
Abate by
Aug 21, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(2): Except as provided in paragraphs (b)(2)(i) and (b)(2)(ii) of this section, each scaffold platform and/or walkway was not at least 18 inches (46 cm) wide:  On or about June 19, 2014 and times prior thereto, employees of Jose Rangel were observed framing a two story residence being constructed at or near 805 Smithfield Drive in Jonesboro, Arkansas.  An employee was observed walking and working on a worksite constructed scaffold with a platform of 6 inches, exposing the employee to a fall distance of 11 1/2 feet to the ground level below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 C02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Aug 13, 2014
Abate by
Aug 21, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames,  or uprights did not bear on base plates, mud sills or other adequate firm foundation:  On or about June 19, 2014 and times prior thereto, employees of Jose Rangel were observed framing a two story residence at or near 805 Smithfield Drive in Jonesboro, Arkansas.  The employer and the employees had assembled three worksite constructed scaffolds.  Scaffold legs and uprights did not bear on base plates, mud sills, or other adequate firm foundation, exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Aug 13, 2014
Abate by
Aug 21, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section:  On or about June 19, 2014 and times prior thereto, employees of Jose Rangel were observed framing a two story residence being constructed at or near 805 Smithfield Drive in Jonesboro, Arkansas.  Employees were observed walking and working from scaffold platforms at heights greater than 10 feet from lower levels without the use of fall protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Aug 13, 2014
Abate by
Aug 21, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,080 · Current $3,080
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladders length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  On or about June 19, 2014 and times prior thereto, employees were observed framing a residence being constructed at or near 805 Smithfield Drive in Jonesboro, Arkansas.  The employees used ladders to access scaffold platforms.  The ladders used did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface being accessed, exposing the employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3080

1926.501 B13

Repeat Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Aug 13, 2014
Penalty
Initial $15,400 · Current $15,400
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   On or about June 19, 2014 and times prior thereto, employees of Jose Rangel were observed framing a two story residence located at or near 805 Smithfield Drive in Jonesboro, Arkansas.  Employees performing decking operations on the steep sloped rooftop with a pitch of 12:12 were not protected from falling with the use of fall protection.  Jose Rangel was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 908060, citation number 1, item number 1, and was affirmed a final order on January 16, 2014 with a final abatement date of June 11, 2013, with respect to a workplace located at or near 4516 Kali Drive in Jonesboro, Arkansas.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (R) $15400

View Jose Rangel's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339815151.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.