Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MARTIN DAVILA

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MARTIN DAVILA in 632 WESTWICK CT., SWANSEA, IL 62226 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339963704.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Martin Davila — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Martin Davila is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MARTIN DAVILA
Site address
632 WESTWICK CT.
City
SWANSEA
State
IL
ZIP
62226
Mailing
9416 MURIEL AVE., SAINT LOUIS, MO 63114
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 3 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 12, 2014
Abate by
Jan 16, 2015
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $400
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.  a)  For Citation 1, Item 1, issued on 10/27/2014 with an abatement date of 11/21/2014, the employer did not submit documents demonstrating complete abatement of the cited violation to OSHA.  b)  For Citation 1, Item 2, issued on 10/27/2014 with an abatement date of 11/21/2014, the employer did not submit documents demonstrating complete abatement of the cited violation to OSHA.  c)  For Citation 1, Item 3, issued on 10/27/2014 with an abatement date of 11/21/2014, the employer did not submit documents demonstrating complete abatement of the cited violation to OSHA.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $400

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 27, 2014
Abate by
Nov 21, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain a safety program which provides for frequent and regular inspections of jobsites, materials, and equipment to be made by a competent person (i.e., a person who is capable of identifying existing and predictable hazards in the surroundings or working conditions which are unsanitary, hazardous, or dangerous to employees, and who has the authority to take prompt corrective measures to eliminate them):                                                                        The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site to identify existing and predictable hazards such as, but not limited to: employees exposed to falls from heights over 25 feet while installing roofing material, eye injury while using pneumatic nail guns, and foot injuries while cleaning roofing materials from the surrounding structure.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.95 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 27, 2014
Abate by
Nov 21, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.95(a): Protective equipment, including personal protective equipment for eyes, face, head, and extremities, protective clothing, respiratory devices, and protective shields and barriers, was not provided, used, and maintained in a sanitary and reliable condition wherever it was necessary by reason of hazards of processes or environment, chemical hazards, radiological hazards, or mechanical irritants encountered in a manner capable of causing injury or impairment in the function of any part of the body through absorption, inhalation or physical contact:    On July 10, 2014, protective footwear was not used by employees walking on, and involved with cleaning up, roofing materials to prevent nails and other roofing materials from causing foot injuries.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $600
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 27, 2014
Abate by
Nov 21, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.    On July 10, 2014, eye protection was not used by employees involved with using pneumatic nail guns during residential roofing operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $600
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 27, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):      On and before July 11, 2014, employees installing roofing materials on a residential home were exposed to falls ranging from 9 foot to greater than 25 feet high while working on roofs with pitches ranging from 2 in 12 (10 degrees) to 12 in 12 (45 degrees) without any fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 27, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:    On July 10, 2014, the ladder used by employees to access the front porch roof (9 feet 1 inch high) did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

View Martin Davila's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339963704.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.