Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SCA CONSTRUCTION, INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of SCA CONSTRUCTION, INC. in 87 EDMUND RD, MARSHFIELD, MA 02050 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 339981748.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch SCA Construction, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for SCA Construction, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
87 EDMUND RD
City
MARSHFIELD
State
MA
ZIP
02050
Mailing
205 OAK ST SUITE 3, PEMBROKE, MA 02359
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 A06

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2014
Abate by
Jan 2, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,080 · Current $1,232 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(6): Scaffolds were not designed by a qualified person:    Location: Jobsite    Employees were exposed to falls greater than ten feet, while attaching trim, where the scaffold was not designed by a qualified person.    Instance 1) A man-made scaffold was built by the Foreman, on the roof and in front of a dormer, where no training, or experience in scaffold erection had been obtained. A qualified person did not inspect this scaffold.    Instance 2) A second man-made scaffold was built by an Employee, on the roof and in front of a dormer. A qualified person did not inspect this scaffold prior to use..
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1232
  • — C (S) $3080
  • — Z (S) $3080

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2014
Abate by
Jan 2, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,080 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section:    Location: Jobsite    Employees were exposed to fall hazards on an unguarded scaffold, above 10 feet, where Employees accessed the roof, and were working from unguarded scaffolds with no fall protection.    Instance 1) The Foreman was working from, and accessed the roof from the unguarded scaffold to install trim alongside a dormer roof edge.    Instance 2) Another Employee was working from another unguarded scaffold to install trim alongside another dormer roof edge, on the opposite side of the building.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $3080
  • — Z (S) $3080

1926.502 B02

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2014
Abate by
Jan 2, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,200 · Current $880 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.502(b)(2): Midrails, screens, mesh, intermediate vertical members, or equivalent intermediate structure members were not installed between the top edge of the guardrail system and the walking/working surface when there was no wall or parapet wall at least 21 inches (53 cm) high.    Location: Jobsite    Employees were exposed to fall hazards greater than 6 feet, while framing the second floor, where a balcony edge and three wall openings were not properly guarded with a midrail.    Instance 1) The second floor balcony edge was not properly guarded with a midrail.    Instance 2) Three wall openings, two on the first floor and one on the second floor, were not properly guarded with a midrail.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $880
  • — C (S) $2200
  • — Z (S) $2200

1926.1052 C01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2014
Abate by
Jan 2, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,760 · Current $704 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(ii): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with a stairrail system along each unprotected side or edge:    Location: Jobsite    Employees were exposed to fall and tripping hazards while working, where no stairrail was installed along the unprotected side or edge of lower half of the stairway, leading to the first floor.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $704
  • — C (S) $1760
  • — Z (S) $1760

1926.1052 C04

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2014
Abate by
Jan 2, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(4): Midrails, screens, mesh, intermediate vertical members, or equivalent intermediate structural members were not provided between the top rail of the stairrail system and the stairway steps:          Location: Jobsite    Employees were exposed to fall hazards while ascending the stairs from the first floor to the second floor, where no midrail was installed between the stairrail and the stairway steps on the unprotected side or edge.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B04

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2014
Abate by
Jan 2, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,320 · Current $528 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladders were used for purposes other than the purposes for which they were designed:    Location: Jobsite    Employees were exposed to fall hazards while using a fiberglass stepladder that was folded, and leaned against a building.    Instance 1) An Employee used a folded ladder to access the building under construction.    Instance 2) Another Employee used a folded ladder on the second floor to perform framing operations.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $528
  • — C (S) $1320
  • — Z (S) $1320

1926.501 B13

Willful Gravity 10 2 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2014
Abate by
Jan 2, 2015
Penalty
Initial $30,800 · Current $22,176 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):     Location: Jobsite    Employees were exposed to fall hazards greater than 6 feet while working, where fall protection had not been used or provided, and an employee fell and succumbed to serious injuries.    Instance 1) The Foreman was working from the roof, attaching trim to the dormer, and was not using any form of fall protection when he fell to the ground.    Instance 2) Employees were exposed to fall hazards at unguarded wall openings on the second floor, where no guardrail system was used to prevent accidental falls.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (W) $22176
  • — C (W) $30800
  • — Z (W) $30800

View SCA Construction, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339981748.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.