Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: GATEWAY EXTRUSIONS, LTD

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GATEWAY EXTRUSIONS, LTD in 704 W. PARK ROAD, UNION, MO 63084 (NAICS 331316). OSHA activity number 339985343.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Gateway Extrusions, LTD for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Gateway Extrusions, LTD is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
704 W. PARK ROAD
City
UNION
State
MO
ZIP
63084
Mailing
704 W. PARK ROAD, UNION, MO 63084
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
331316
Employees
55
Ownership type
Private (A)

10 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 6, 2015
Abate by
Mar 26, 2015
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $2,975 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1):     Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employee(s) in that employee(s) were exposed to the hazard of being struck-by:    a/  Inside of the Painting Department, employee(s) were exposed to a struck-by hazard due to a possible unplanned collapse of two metal, shelving units, each three tiers high, that were not anchored.     One method of abatement to correct this apparent hazard is to bolt or otherwise secure both shelving units to the concrete floor as required by ANSI MH16.1-2012, paragraph 1.4.7.     DISCLAIMER:    a/  The employer is not limited to the abatement method(s) suggested by OSHA.  b/  The employer is responsible for selecting and implementing an effective abatement method.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2975
  • · Z (S) $5000

1910.23 A05

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 6, 2015
Abate by
Mar 26, 2015
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $2,975 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(a)(5): Infrequently used pit or trap door floor opening(s) were not guarded by a floor opening cover of standard strength and construction. While the cover is not in place, the pit or trap opening was not constantly attended by someone or was protected on all exposed sides by removable standard railings:    a/  Inside of the Fabrication Department, a floor opening measuring approximately 113"L X 23"W X 9.5"D was unguarded.  This unguarded floor opening was located adjacent to the east end of the Pacific Press Brake, m/n K200-1845, s/n 9007.    IN THE ALTERNATIVE:    29 CFR 1910.23(a)(7):  Temporary floor opening(s) were not guarded by standard railings or constantly attended by someone:    a/  Inside of the Fabrication Department, a floor opening measuring approximately 113"L X 23"W X 9.5"D was unguarded.  This unguarded floor opening was located adjacent to the east end of the Pacific Press Brake, m/n K200-1845, s/n 9007.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2975
  • · Z (S) $5000

1910.23 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 6, 2015
Abate by
Mar 26, 2015
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $2,975 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(e)(1): A standard railing did not consist of top rail, intermediate rail, and posts, and did not have a vertical height of 42 inches nominal from upper surface of top rail to floor, platform, runway, or ramp level:      a/  Inside of the Production Area, the railing along the open edge of a platform over the Age Oven consisted of a top rail only.  The vertical height of this top rail was approximately 35 inches above the platform.  The height of this platform was approximately 11 feet above the concrete floor.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2975
  • · Z (S) $5000

1910.147 C04 II

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 6, 2015
Abate by
Mar 26, 2015
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $2,975 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii): Procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy, and the means to enforce compliance including, but not limited to, 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(A), (c)(4)(ii)(B), (c)(4)(ii)(C) and (c)(4)(ii)(D):    Inside of the Production Area, the specific lockout/tagout procedures were missing the following components:    a/  The procedure for the Age Oven failed to address at what temperature was it safe to begin servicing.    b/  The procedure for the Die Heater Box failed to address at what temperature was it safe to begin servicing.    d/   The procedure for the Wash System Heater failed to address at what temperature was it safe to begin servicing.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2975
  • · Z (S) $5000

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 6, 2015
Abate by
Mar 26, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirements of this standard are being followed:  Inside of the Production Area, the specific lockout/tagout procedures for the following machines were not audited:  a/  Age Oven.  b/  Die Heater Box.  c/   Pacific Press Brake, m/n K200-1845, s/n 9007.  d/  Wash System Heater.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 5 27 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 6, 2015
Abate by
Mar 26, 2015
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $2,975 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii):  Point(s) of operation (P.O.O.) of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):    a/  Inside of the Fabrication Department, the P.O.O. belonging to the Pacific Press Brakes, m/n K200-1845, s/n 9007, and s/n 9008, was unguarded.  The P.O.O. was approximately .5 inches wide.    b/  Inside of the Maintenance Department, the P.O.O. belonging to the Denison HydroLite Multipress, unknown m/n or s/n, was unguarded.  The P.O.O. was approximately one inch wide.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2975
  • · Z (S) $5000

1910.215 A04

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 6, 2015
Abate by
Mar 26, 2015
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $2,975 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4):  Work rests were not kept adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one-eighth inch to prevent the work from being jammed between the wheel and the rest, which may cause wheel breakage:    a/  Inside of the Maintenance Department, the two work rests belonging to the pedestal mounted dual abrasive wheel grinder, unknown make, model, or serial number, were not within one-eighth of an inch from the wheel.  The left work rest was approximately three-fourths of an inch away.  The right work rest was approximately three-eighths of an inch away.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2975
  • · Z (S) $5000

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 6, 2015
Abate by
Mar 26, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch:  a/  Inside of the Fabrication Department, the distance between the peripheral guard and the abrasive wheel belonging to the Baldor Pedestal Grinder, m/n 8107W, s/n 5288, was approximately one-half inch.  b/  Inside of the Maintenance Department, the distance between the peripheral guard and the abrasive wheel belonging to the Dayton 8" Bench Grinder, m/n A29D9B, unknown s/n, was approximately one-half inch.  c/  Inside of the Maintenance Department, the distance between the peripheral guards and the abrasive wheels belonging to the pedestal mounted dual abrasive wheel grinder, unknown make, model, or serial number, exceeded one-fourth inch.  The left wheel was approximately one inch away.  The right wheel was approximately one inch away.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.305 B01 II

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 6, 2015
Abate by
Mar 26, 2015
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $2,975 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii): Unused openings in cabinets, boxes, and fittings were not effectively closed:    a/  Inside of the Fabrication Department, two, unused openings belonging to the electrical disconnect supplying 480 volt electrical power to the Hydraulic Pump Unit, unknown make, model, or serial number, were not covered.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2975
  • · Z (S) $5000

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 6, 2015
Abate by
Mar 26, 2015
Penalty
Initial $25,000 · Current $4,165 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1):  One or more methods of machine guarding were not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    a/  Inside of the Fabrication Department, the Vertical Sander, m/n 82-910, unknown s/n, was unguarded.    b/  Inside of the Maintenance Department, the pitman belonging to the Denison Hydro-Lite Multipress, unknown m/n or s/n, was unguarded.    The Crystal Extrusion Systems LTD was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard, 29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 242750, citation number 1, item number 4, and was affirmed as a final order on 01/07/14, with respect to a workplace located at 704 W. Park Road, Union, MO 63084.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $4165
  • · Z (R) $25000

View Gateway Extrusions, LTD's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339985343.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.