Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: JOS? ALBERTO CALLEJAS-CRUZ

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of JOS? ALBERTO CALLEJAS-CRUZ in 417 PEACHTREE DRIVE, RINCON, GA 31326 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 339990517.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch JOS? Alberto Callejas-Cruz — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for JOS? Alberto Callejas-Cruz is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
417 PEACHTREE DRIVE
City
RINCON
State
GA
ZIP
31326
Mailing
87 VILLAGE DRIVE, GARDEN CITY, GA 31408
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 5, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:    a) Jobsite, on or about October 07, 2014, four employees who were working below overhead wood framing activity and were not wearing head protection were exposed to being struck by materials and equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $960
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 5, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:    a) Jobsite, on or about October 07, 2014, two employees who were installing ply-wood panels using portable hand tools such as pneumatic nail guns and circular saws were not wearing eye protection, resulting in a struck-by hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.404 F06

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 5, 2014
Abate by
Nov 18, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.404(f)(6): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, or enclosures was not permanent and continuous:    Jobsite, on or about October 07, 2014, employees were using extension cords without ground prong attached throughout the jobsite, exposing employees to electric and shock hazards.      a) Jobsite, on or about October 07, 2014, employees were using a red three-outlet extension cord with a missing ground pin that was attached to a yellow/black extension cord with a missing ground pin to power a Makita circular saw.      b) Jobsite, on or about October 07, 2014, employees were using a red three-outlet extension cord with a missing ground pin attached to a yellow extension cord to power a Makita circular saw.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 5, 2014
Abate by
Nov 18, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):    a) Jobsite, on or about October 07, 2014, employees who were exposed to open trusses and exposed leading edges were not using fall protection while working on the second level of the partially constructed wood framed house while installing ply-wood panels, resulting in fall hazards of about 11.5 feet to the ground.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 5, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:    a) Jobsite  417 Peachtree Drive, Rincon GA - On or about October 07, 2014, employees used an aluminum extension ladder without the side rails of the ladder being extended at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface nor was the ladder secured at its top to a rigid support to gain access to a second working level while installing ply-wood panels, exposing employees to fall hazards of about 11.5 feet onto the ground.     ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS NOT REQUIRED.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

View JOS? Alberto Callejas-Cruz's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339990517.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.