RINCON, GA —
OSHA Inspection: JOS? ALBERTO CALLEJAS-CRUZ
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of JOS? ALBERTO CALLEJAS-CRUZ in 417 PEACHTREE DRIVE, RINCON, GA 31326 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 339990517.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JOS? ALBERTO CALLEJAS-CRUZ
- Site address
- 417 PEACHTREE DRIVE
- City
- RINCON
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 31326
- Mailing
- 87 VILLAGE DRIVE, GARDEN CITY, GA 31408
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Nov 5, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: a) Jobsite, on or about October 07, 2014, four employees who were working below overhead wood framing activity and were not wearing head protection were exposed to being struck by materials and equipment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $960
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Nov 5, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: a) Jobsite, on or about October 07, 2014, two employees who were installing ply-wood panels using portable hand tools such as pneumatic nail guns and circular saws were not wearing eye protection, resulting in a struck-by hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.404 F06
- Issued
- Nov 5, 2014
- Abate by
- Nov 18, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.404(f)(6): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, or enclosures was not permanent and continuous: Jobsite, on or about October 07, 2014, employees were using extension cords without ground prong attached throughout the jobsite, exposing employees to electric and shock hazards. a) Jobsite, on or about October 07, 2014, employees were using a red three-outlet extension cord with a missing ground pin that was attached to a yellow/black extension cord with a missing ground pin to power a Makita circular saw. b) Jobsite, on or about October 07, 2014, employees were using a red three-outlet extension cord with a missing ground pin attached to a yellow extension cord to power a Makita circular saw.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $720
- — Z (S) $1200
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Nov 5, 2014
- Abate by
- Nov 18, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a) Jobsite, on or about October 07, 2014, employees who were exposed to open trusses and exposed leading edges were not using fall protection while working on the second level of the partially constructed wood framed house while installing ply-wood panels, resulting in fall hazards of about 11.5 feet to the ground.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Nov 5, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: a) Jobsite 417 Peachtree Drive, Rincon GA - On or about October 07, 2014, employees used an aluminum extension ladder without the side rails of the ladder being extended at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface nor was the ladder secured at its top to a rigid support to gain access to a second working level while installing ply-wood panels, exposing employees to fall hazards of about 11.5 feet onto the ground. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS NOT REQUIRED.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $2000
More inspections at JOS? Alberto Callejas-Cruz
View JOS? Alberto Callejas-Cruz's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339990517.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.