WISCONSIN RAPIDS, WI —
OSHA Inspection: LM CONSTRUCTION
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LM CONSTRUCTION in 2ND & PINE STREET, WISCONSIN RAPIDS, WI 54494 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 340070499.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LM CONSTRUCTION
- Site address
- 2ND & PINE STREET
- City
- WISCONSIN RAPIDS
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 54494
- Mailing
- 1218 11TH AVENUE NORTH, PRINCETON, MN 55371
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236118
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Dec 9, 2014
- Abate by
- Dec 17, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. On or about November 5, 2014, employees were tearing off and shingling a residential roof and were not protected from falling to lower levels.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Dec 9, 2014
- Abate by
- Dec 17, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails were not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support. On or about November 5, 2014, employees were accessing a residential roof using a portable ladder that was not extended at least three feet higher than the upper landing of the roof.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2400
More inspections at LM Construction
View LM Construction's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236118)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340070499.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.