MANCHESTER, NH —
OSHA Inspection: SAVERS, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of SAVERS, INC. in 93 S. MAPLE STREET, MANCHESTER, NH 03103 (NAICS 453310). OSHA activity number 340194380.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SAVERS, INC.
- Site address
- 93 S. MAPLE STREET
- City
- MANCHESTER
- State
- NH
- ZIP
- 03103
- Mailing
- 93 S. MAPLE STREET, MANCHESTER, NH 03103
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 453310
- Employees
- 2000
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Mar 10, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 16, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $5,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE): a. Site - On or about January 21, 2015, the employer failed to perform a hazard assessment for employees assigned battery maintenance duties, to determine the proper PPE for performing this work.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $5000
1910.132 F01
- Issued
- Mar 10, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 16, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1): The employer did not provide training to each employee who is required by this section to use personal protective equipment: a. Site - On or about January 21, 2015, the employer failed to provide PPE training for employees assigned battery maintenance procedures to ensure that employees understood the hazards and proper PPE needed to protect themselves.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Mar 10, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 16, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): Protective eye equipment was not required where there was a reasonable probability of injury that could be prevented by such equipment: a. Site - On or about January 21, 2015, employees assigned battery maintenance procedures were not provided with eye protection prior to performing the task.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.138 A
- Issued
- Mar 10, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 16, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasion; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes: a. Site - On or about January 21, 2015, employees assigned battery maintenance procedures were not provided with hand protection prior to performing the task.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Mar 10, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 16, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use: a. Site - On or about January 21, 2015, an eyewash station was not provided to employees who are assigned to handle corrosive materials.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.37 B02
- Issued
- Mar 10, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 16, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(2): Each exit was not clearly visible and marked by a sign reading "Exit": a. Site - On or about January 21, 2015, the emergency exit door in the shipping and receiving department was not provided with an exit sign to indicate its purpose.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Savers, INC.
View Savers, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 453310)
More inspections in NH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340194380.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.