Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: STRAIGHT EDGE ROOFING, LLC

Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of STRAIGHT EDGE ROOFING, LLC in 825 EALES AVE., WAUKESHA, WI 53186 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 340217082.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Straight Edge Roofing, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Straight Edge Roofing, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
825 EALES AVE.
City
WAUKESHA
State
WI
ZIP
53186
Mailing
2101 S. 92ND ST., WEST ALLIS, WI 53227
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Other (I)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 8, 2015
Abate by
Jun 12, 2015
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $400
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required:    a)  Abatement certification was not provided for citation 1, item 1 which states that employer did not ensure that employees were wearing head protection when working under employees, material and equipment.  b)  Documentation and certification were not provided for citation 1, item 2 which states that the employer did not ensure that fall protection was used when conducting roofing work on a residential building.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $400

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 10, 2015
Abate by
Feb 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:   (a) The employer did not ensure that employees were using head protection when working under other employees, material, and equipment.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 10, 2015
Abate by
Feb 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system:   (a) The employer did not ensure that fall protection was being used when conducting roofing work on a residential building, exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 10, 2015
Abate by
Mar 9, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:   (a) The employer did not ensure that all employees were trained in recognizing fall hazards and implementing fall protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 10, 2015
Abate by
Feb 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  (a) The employer did not ensure that a ladder used for access and egress was at least 3 feet above the landing surface.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

View Straight Edge Roofing, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340217082.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.