Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: PROTOTEK SHEETMETAL FABRICATION, LLC

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of PROTOTEK SHEETMETAL FABRICATION, LLC in 244 BURNHAM INTERVALE ROAD, CONTOOCOOK, NH 03229 (NAICS 332322). OSHA activity number 340246685.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Prototek Sheetmetal Fabrication, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Prototek Sheetmetal Fabrication, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
244 BURNHAM INTERVALE ROAD
City
CONTOOCOOK
State
NH
ZIP
03229
Mailing
244 BURNHAM INTERVALE ROAD, CONTOOCOOK, NH 03229
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332322
Employees
89
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 G05 I

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 26, 2015
Abate by
Apr 28, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $4,900

Hazardous substances 81108111

29 CFR 1910.95(g)(5)(i): The employer did not establish, within 6 months of an employee's first exposure at or above the action level, a valid baseline audiogram against which subsequent audiograms can be compared:    (a) Location: Aluminum Grinding Area:    On or about February 18, 2015, a grinder operator (RO) was exposed to noise levels at 132% of the allowable 8 hour time-weighted average.  The equivalent level of the 132% is approximately 92.0 dBA which is capable of causing permanent hearing loss.  The sampling was performed for 483 minutes during one work shift on February 18, 2015.  The noise level exceeded the action level of 85 dBA and the employee had not received a baseline audiogram.      (b) Location: Sheetmetal and Aluminum Grinding Areas:    On or about February 18, 2015, a grinder operator (TM) was exposed to noise levels at 80% of the allowable 8 hour time-weighted average.  The equivalent level of the 80% is approximately 88.3 dBA which is capable of causing permanent hearing loss.  The sampling was performed for 476 minutes during one work shift on February 18, 2015.  The noise level exceeded the action level of 85 dBA and the employee had not received a baseline audiogram.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4900
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.95 I02 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 26, 2015
Abate by
Apr 2, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 81108111

29 CFR 1910.95(I)(2)(i): The employer did not ensure that hearing protectors are worn by an employee who is required by paragraph (b)(1) of this section to wear personal protective equipment.    (a) Location: Aluminum Grinding Area:        On or about February 18, 2015, an employee (RO) using grinders on metal was exposed to noise levels at 132% of the allowable 8 hour time-weighted average sound level (90 dBA).  The equivalent level of the 132% is approximately 92 dBA which is capable of causing permanent hearing loss.  The sampling was performed for 483 minutes during one work shift on February 18, 2015.  The noise level exceeded the permissible exposure limit of 90 dBA and no hearing protectors were worn by the employee at the time of the exposure.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.95 K01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 26, 2015
Abate by
Apr 14, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 81108111

29 CFR 1910.95(k)(1): The employer did not train each employee who is exposed to noise at or above an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels in accordance with the requirements of this section.     (a) Location: Aluminum Grinding Area:    On or about February 18, 2015, a grinder operator (RO) was exposed to noise levels at 132% of the allowable 8 hour time-weighted average.  The equivalent level of the 132% is approximately 92 dBA which is capable of causing permanent hearing loss.  The sampling was performed for 483 minutes during one work shift on February 18, 2015.  The noise level exceeded the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels.  The employee was not trained in the company's hearing conservation program.      (b) Location: Sheetmetal and Aluminum Grinding Areas:     On or about February 18, 2015, a grinder operator (TM) was exposed to noise levels at 80%of the allowable 8 hour time-weighted average.  The equivalent level of the 80% is approximately 88.3 dBA which is capable of causing permanent hearing loss.  The sampling was performed for 476 minutes during one work shift on February 18, 2015.  The noise level exceeded the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels.  The employee was not trained in the company's hearing conservation program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.178 M05 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 26, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $1,750 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(m)(5)(i): When a powered industrial truck is left unattended, load engaging means shall be fully lowered, controls shall be neutralized, power shall be shut off, and brakes set. Wheels shall be blocked if the truck is parked on an incline.     a.     Location: Main bay area: on 30 January, 2015, an employee was seen by CSHO leaving the forklift unattended with the forks raised approximately 3 feet while holding the load of a pallet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1750
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.219 C02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 26, 2015
Abate by
May 12, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $1,750 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(2)(i): The employer did not ensure all exposed parts of horizontal shafting seven (7) feet or less from floor or working platform, were protected by a stationary casing enclosing shafting completely or by a trough enclosing sides and top or sides and bottom of shafting as location requires.    a.    Location: Deburring Department - The horizontal shafts on the Baldor buffing machine were not guarded.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1750
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.219 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 26, 2015
Abate by
May 12, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(4)(i): Unguarded projecting shaft end(s) did not present a smooth edge and end and projected more than one half the diameter of the shaft:   a.    Location: Deburring Department - The projecting shaft ends on the Baldor buffing machine were not guarded.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.242 B

Serious Gravity 5 8 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 26, 2015
Abate by
Apr 14, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $1,750 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.242(b): Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.:    a.     Location: Machine shop building - Compressed air at the VMX42 Horco machine was measured at 80 p.s.i.    b.     Location: Main Prototek building - Compressed air at the sheetmetal machining area was measured at 80 p.s.i.    c.     Location: Main Prototek building - Compressed air at the sheetmetal machining area was measured at 50 p.s.i.    d.     Location: Main Prototek building - Compressed air at the plating area was measured at 110 p.s.i.     e.     Location: Main Prototek building - Compressed air at powder coating area was measured at 100 p.s.i.     f.     Location: Main Prototek building - Compressed air at powder coating area was measured at 70 p.s.i.     g.     Location: Main Prototek building - Compressed air at the deburring area was measured at 80 p.s.i.     h.     Location: Main Prototek building - Compressed air at new grinding area was 50 p.s.i.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1750
  • — Z (S) $3500

View Prototek Sheetmetal Fabrication, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340246685.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.