Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: DAHONG DEVELOPMENT CORP

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of DAHONG DEVELOPMENT CORP in BUEAN VISTA SUBDIVISION, MANGILAO, GU 96913 (NAICS 236115). OSHA activity number 340305036.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Dahong Development Corp — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Dahong Development Corp is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
BUEAN VISTA SUBDIVISION
City
MANGILAO
State
GU
ZIP
96913
Mailing
P.O. BOX 7751, TAMUNING, GU 96931
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236115
Employees
15
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 C02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 21, 2015
Abate by
May 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $1,360
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(ii): Unstable objects were used to support scaffolds or platform units:   a)  On February 6, 2015, inside the new building, concrete blocks turned on their ends stacked four high were used to support the platform, exposing employees to a fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1360

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 21, 2015
Abate by
May 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section:   a) On February 6, 2015, employees working above 10 feet on wood pole scaffolding were not protected from falling to the lower level by guardrails or other methods.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B04

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 21, 2015
Abate by
May 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladders were used for purposes other than the purposes for which they were designed:   a. On February 6, 2015, on the West side of the building, employees were accessing a scaffold platform using a folded 5-foot step ladder.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 21, 2015
Abate by
May 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,700 · Current $1,700
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m)  or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502:    a)  On February 6, 2015, fall protection or an alternative fall protection measure was not provided for employees working on the roof of a residential home, exposing employees to an approximately 20 foot fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1700

1926.651 J02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 21, 2015
Abate by
May 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,020 · Current $1,020
29 CFR 1926.651(j)(2): Protection was not provided by placing and keeping excavated or other materials or equipment at least 2 feet (.61m) from the edge of excavations, or by the use of retaining devices that were sufficient to prevent materials or equipment from falling or rolling into excavations, or by a combination of both if necessary.   a) On February 6, 2015, next to the driveway entrance, the spoil pile of a septic system excavation was less than two feet from the edge of the excavation.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1020

1926.651 K01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 21, 2015
Abate by
May 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.651(k)(1): An inspection of the excavations, the adjacent areas, and protective systems was not conducted by the competent person prior to the start of work and as needed throughout the shift:   a) On February 6, 2015, next to the driveway entrance, daily inspections were not conducted by a competent person of the excavation for the septic system.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

View Dahong Development Corp's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340305036.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.